Sky/Froome Talk Only (No Way Sky Are Cleans?)

[the sceptic]

My friend, I imagine similar things have been said by some
regarding the finest works of Geoffrey Chaucer.

Perhaps the posts by Taxus4a cannot rival the elegance
and symmetry of the Father of English Literature, but
they do possess an endearing lyrical beauty and passion.

I highly recommend to those who have not done so yet to
follow the link in his signature line and enjoy his study titled
'An unpolished diamond: the story of Chris Froome.'

 

[LaFlorecita]

Froome is cleans. That's all you need to know

He ain't a dopper.

 

[LaFlorecita]

That was my reaction exactly

 

[Taxus4a]

My friend, I imagine similar things have been said by some
regarding the finest works of Geoffrey Chaucer.

Perhaps the posts by Taxus4a cannot rival the elegance
and symmetry of the Father of English Literature, but
they do possess an endearing lyrical beauty and passion.

I highly recommend to those who have not done so yet to
follow the link in his signature line and enjoy his study titled
'An unpolished diamond: the story of Chris Froome.'

Than you!

Just for this words my work was worthy.

It was made with passion, yes, even it is not a demostration of no doping, it is a demostration of some things said that hurt me when I read

I have some literary skills... but in my lenguage, in english must be funny or hard to follow me , but anyway I consider I have things to say, and that basically it is possible to understand them.

 

[Spencer the Half Wit]

Than you!

Just for this words my work was worthy.

It was made with passion, yes, even it is not a demostration of no doping, it is a demostration of some things said that hurt me when I read

I have some literary skills... but in my lenguage, in english must be funny or hard to follow me , but anyway I considerer I have things to say, and that basically it is possible to understand.

Don't know about Chaucer, but you certainly remind me of this bloke http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Unwin_(comedian)

Seriously, though that was not meant to mock your English, it is far better than my Spanish would be.

 

[hrotha]

I like Chaucer, but "father of English literature" he ain't. English has one of the longest, richest vernacular literary traditions in Europe, going back many centuries before him.

 

[Benotti69]

Froome is cleans. That's all you need to know

Froomes are cleans. Froomes are an alien species.

 

[ro1324]

and who TF is Chris Froome?

where TF is not equal to 'The France'.
Never heard of Chris Froome until he was Wiggo's sidekick last year. I guess Sky keeps this guys locked up and well doped at the track until ready to be unleashed on the road. These guys are like the Lady Gagas of cycling. Will be around a couple of years before they are totally spent and blown.

Thank you shining Team Sky for using the cutting-edge & newest drugs, and thanks for cycling in general for such a broad base drug testing program. Lets allow a couple of decades to elapse and see how many riders from 1995-2005 are going to be alive before we compute the due safety statistics.

peace,

 

[Taxus4a]

where TF is not equal to 'The France'.
Never heard of Chris Froome until he was Wiggo's sidekick last year. I guess Sky keeps this guys locked up and well doped at the track until ready to be unleashed on the road. These guys are like the Lady Gagas of cycling. Will be around a couple of years before they are totally spent and blown.

Thank you shining Team Sky for using the cutting-edge & newest drugs, and thanks for cycling in general for such a broad base drug testing program. Lets allow a couple of decades to elapse and see how many riders from 1995-2005 are going to be alive before we compute to due safety statistics.

peace,

I think is useless, but with my respect, you have said a lot of BS...If you want to talk after to be informed, you can do it reading the article of my signature or any other similar, or investigating a little.

Peace

 

[bobbins]

I think is useless, but with my respect, you have said a lot of BS...If you want to talk after to be informed, you can do it reading the article of my signature or any other similar, or investigating a little.

Peace

The article in your signature seems more like a fairly tale or work of fiction than any sensible factual piece of work. It's the kind of story that I could imagine Sky feeding to the ignorant media to explain their miracle.

If recent history has taught us anything, it's that in this sport we can't afford to have heros.

When a story seems too good to be true, then it most likely is and unfortunately the transformation of Froome from mid-pack mediocrity to Tour winner just simply isn't believable.

I've done a little investigating and nothing I have heard from people very closely involved has made me thing anything different.

 

[Taxus4a]

The article in your signature seems more like a fairly tale or work of fiction than any sensible factual piece of work. It's the kind of story that I could imagine Sky feeding to the ignorant media to explain their miracle.

If recent history has taught us anything, it's that in this sport we can't afford to have heros.

When a story seems too good to be true, then it most likely is and unfortunately the transformation of Froome from mid-pack mediocrity to Tour winner just simply isn't believable.

I've done a little investigating and nothing I have heard from people very closely involved has made me thing anything different.

You didnt understand anything of that article.

And if you read it, first thing you understand it is that is believable, and I show you why.

 

[The Hitch]

Stop calling that **** you wrote an article. It's a bunch of nonsensical babble written (or an attempt at writing was made anyway) by you and by hyping it all the time you are just being a sad attention seeker.

"Oh look at me, look at me I'm so great look at what what I wrote."

 

[thehog]

Froomes are cleans. Froomes are an alien species.

All Froomes ares cleans. Total froomes aniliation. Full metal froomes.

 

[thehog]

Stop calling that **** you wrote an article. It's a bunch of nonsensical babble written (or an attempt at writing was made anyway) by you and by hyping it all the time you are just being a sad attention seeker.

"Oh look at me, look at me I'm so great look at what what I wrote."

Can you tell the difference between an unpolished diamond and Chris Froome?

 

[Eshnar]

the next time I see a post about a particular user bans will be delivered. You really need to stop it people.

 

[Cyivel]

You didnt understand anything of that article.

And if you read it, first thing you understand it is that is believable, and I show you why.

Thankyou for showing me the light brother, I'll be eternally grateful.

 

[The Hitch]

the next time I see a post about a particular user bans will be delivered. You really need to stop it people.

Taxus is in a very conceited way going on about how if we read his blog we will find all the answers. That is a direct challenge to us, and seeing as you have not deleted it, it is there to be answered.

How can I answer taxus's challenge and jnform taxus that he is behaving in a self absorbed way and that he should stop telling us to read his blog entry because it simply is not any good, without breaking your "rules"?

 

[Taxus4a]

Thankyou for showing me the light brother, I'll be eternally grateful.

You are wellcome, but you could have reached that as well investigating instead of saying inaccuracies or falsehoods

 

[the sceptic]

the next time I see a post about a particular user bans will be delivered. You really need to stop it people.

are we allowed to say his blog sucks?

 

[LaFlorecita]

Thankyou for showing me the light brother, I'll be eternally grateful.

Love it

 

[Eshnar]

are we allowed to say his blog sucks?

If you wanna counter-argue his article, as long as it is on topic, you can. But going personal, you can't.

 

[oldcrank]

.....but it does seem like that women's record is still a little soft......

I agree, my friend, and it may get broken again as soon
as next month in Aguascalientes at the next World Cup,
and perhaps not by only the GBR women.

 

[the sceptic]

If you wanna counter-argue his article, as long as it is on topic, you can. But going personal, you can't.

Since when is saying his blog sucks personal? I didnt say anything about the person that wrote the blog.

If he is allowed to spam his blog every other post I should be allowed to tell him its worthless and doesnt add anything to the discussion.

 

[Eshnar]

Since when is saying his blog sucks personal?

it is not. I said not to go personal, not that you did. It would be nice though, to back it up with some more thoughtful reasoning.

edit: Oh, and I believe I said to go back on topic. That is not Taxus4a.

 

[Taxus4a]

Since when is saying his blog sucks personal? I didnt say anything about the person that wrote the blog.

If he is allowed to spam his blog every other post I should be allowed to tell him its worthless and doesnt add anything to the discussion.

I have understood that. So there is not problem, but I goint to put here the answer give to Eshnar anyway, becouse i undeerstand the rules, but I dont want to be treated as publicity what is not.

I repeat you, I dont do publicity, so dont tell me about it: the only publicity you can do..., even my signature it is not properly publicity, but it could be considerer like that.

It is a question of knowledge. I dont get money for this, I did for cycling, so, you can tell me there is some rules and that could be considering publicity, but no more.

Mi article, if you have read it, it is basically a list of links to another articles, with an argument to explain things, so well, I could quote another article, but it is the same to put my article.

That give me more work, but it is the same. I think the only problem it is that I have writte it, if would be a UCI statement or an interview to Lance or any other thing of interest to debate on the forum, it wouldnt be any problem.

And my article is a work that it was done for debating things in a forum, it is not an opinion, it is a help for the forums, so it must not be treatted as the same way that an opinion.

There is a debate and there is a work that answer a lot of questions made in the debate and that take long time do it, and instead be gratefull your answer is: be carefull.

I repeat, you can remeber me the rules and explain me that maybe someone could be consider that publicity (I didnt see anybody saying that) and for that reason your mission is not allow that, but dont talk to me as if I am was spam or something like that, a little of respect, becouse it is a long work for the use of cycling fans, and it is better that way that long post in the forum explaining the same.

Put the article in some part of the forum if you want, for me it is not a question of to have visitors.
Would be a problem of doing that? Is it that publicity?

Thanks.