Ten days later, what they did was against the rules of the sport.CO for testing is still allowed, and widely considered safe;
the 'shock horror' attitude of the reference to teenagers ignores the fact that they are legal adults;
reference to Kolobnev is just gratuitous: how many hotels have altitude simulation capacity?
I'm not going to say that Ineos, or anyone else in the sport, is above suspicion, but this truly is a dire article.
I remember when the Times was a respected journal of record.