- Mar 19, 2009
- 1,311
- 0
- 0
BigBoat said:While I'll admit not having the mods step in and censor the forum is great... Its divulged into some pointless references that keeps people (like me) away from wanting to attempt real discussions.
I like Lemond and I think he was clean. In the 1980s as Donotti (Sandro did I spell donatti right anyone??) pointed out epo at the top level had not really got going. It was indeed still possible to beat doped riders because all dopers really had then was corticoids, HGH and stimulants which didnt directly increase power.
Lemond is trying here to point out (along with Donatti and some others) that drugs are far bigger than governing bodies whether sporting bodies or UN sponsored anti- drug organizations claim. Its a really sad battle that they cannot possibly win. All the legal lawsuits are far more difficult to overcome than it would be to just accept the fact that all the top riders are jacked through the roof and all you can do is laugh at them for being lab rats and move on. Some of the stats they have (like on the coke trade) is incredibly insightful though, and its amazing that their are actually people keeping track of just how much cocaine we have in the world.
I honestly wish all riders were on SRM equiped bikes controlled by the bodies like ASO, and performance values could be compared from week to week to truly see the power of the riders and see the difference blood "refills" make and then try to pinpoint exactly when people start doping or have to stop doping. This wont happen though and I think it has not only to do with corruption but lack of insight and intelligence amongst the majority of fans and the media. The average "Livestrong" supporter just isnt very bright. LOL
Oh yeah, and that guy David Walsh being labeled as a "troll" and tabloid journalist.... With that going on do anti dopers actually think they can win? LOL not gonna happen...