BigMac said:
I really think that what makes people dislike Contador are his fans. You would all be crawling up the walls if it was Valverde in the 'wheelsucking' position. I don't mind what Contador did today, I think it was what he had to to, but to bash Valverde and praise Contador for the exact same thing is pure hypocrisy. Again, please acknowledge you were wrong when you claimed Valverde should work (even though it's perfectly understandable he did not) or apply the same reasoning to Alberto.
We (the forum, not directed at you personally) need to get our terms straight.
Contador does not "wheelsuck", ever. He "follows", sometimes, as tactics dictate, such as today.
I would say the same for Valverde (and Purito, though not exactly), but some people would disagree, obviously. I cut Valverde slack tactically because he's a giant who has never made it through a grand tour in recent years without cracking at some point, and he (and we) never know when or if it's going to happen. He knows he can win in the last 500m, but before that he's never sure he's going to survive the stage. So following often makes sense, for him, tactically. His following serves an obvious important tactical purpose with implications for the whole race, therefore it is not wheelsucking. My tactical beef with Valverde is that he's sometimes more conservative than I would like him to be, maybe he underestimates himself. He scored a gain yesterday, but I was wishing the whole time that he had cooperated to put time into Froome, 'cause he could have had it all.
There are other riders for whom wheelsucking seems to be an end in itself. Some make a career out of it, some just never do their share in a break, etc. I reserve the term for them. To use it on champions diminishes the insult.
Fromme's tactics cannot be described by any known cycling convention.

He does not follow or attack; he is Meter Man.
Edit: haha, I see Vino Attacks just said more-or-less the same thing with a lot fewer words.