That article is the biggest, steamy load of crapola I've read in quite some time. I did not see one fact related in the entire text.Protein said:http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/astana-have-receipt-for-contadors-steak-says-cook
Seems this is good news for Contador if they have the receipt for the steak. I think that would be enough to satisfy the UCI, and the blood doping test is not recognised yet so I think it's unlikely AC will receive any type of sanction.
But I still have some doubts on the clen issue. Is this Spanish chef just a fanboy? Why has it taken so long for him to claim they still have a receipt? It seems they would have found the receipt by now if they still have it, unless they get one that is backdated....
I'm not sure how the chef is useful in determining whether Contador is innocent. Why is his opinion relevant?
I'd love to believe it's all a big SNAFU, but sorry, that's up there with VDB's dog in the pantheon of doping excuses.