- Mar 13, 2009
- 29,413
- 3,482
- 28,180
Kruijswijk was behind the pile up. Came back with Van Emden, but then they were at the back end of the peloton. Logically they couldn't move up in time to prevent the 2nd split in the end.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Kruijswijk was behind the pile up. Came back with Van Emden, but then they were at the back end of the peloton. Logically they couldn't move up in time to prevent the 2nd split in the end.
HelloDolly said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Kruijswijk was behind the pile up. Came back with Van Emden, but then they were at the back end of the peloton. Logically they couldn't move up in time to prevent the 2nd split in the end.
Problem for Kruijswijk is not the loss of 13 seconds but that he is hurt from his crash in Yorkshire
Kwibus said:HelloDolly said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Kruijswijk was behind the pile up. Came back with Van Emden, but then they were at the back end of the peloton. Logically they couldn't move up in time to prevent the 2nd split in the end.
Problem for Kruijswijk is not the loss of 13 seconds but that he is hurt from his crash in Yorkshire
Is he? I havent read anything saying he's still hurting.
Problem for Steven right now is that he's a bit scared of these bunchsprint run ins as he admitted after the stage.
If I recall correctly the team kept him at the front of the race last year also in the first week when we all didnt know he was in absolute topshape yet. I didnt see much yesterday, but what I've seen and read was that lottonl never kept Kruissie at the front row like they did last year. Tbh it's a lot harder this year with this wide top field. More teams want to be at the front.
Dekker_Tifosi said:Kruijswijk said today he's glad he didn't lose time but also said he doesn't feel physically super. Especially because of the 2 crashes his had. Not that he is hurt, but it just took some energy and as I feared it means he will not reach the same form as last year. So tbh I think he's going to lose a significant amount of time on Blockhaus and not do much more this Giro then maybe top 10.
Dekker_Tifosi said:No, everybody thinks that since quintana is entering. Without Quintana and without his falls in yorkshire and early this Giro, he would have had a good shot
Tonton said:Kruijswijk is a contender, no doubt. Sitting where he is, fine: the best is yet to come. Quintana? Blah, blah, blah. Pinot (@Valv.piti)? We all waited for his Tibogiro, we'll see. I hope that you will eat your beard when he wins the whole thing. Myths...good on the descent today, wasn't he?
SK is very dangerous in his '16 form. He should have won the Giro: went for his food and fell. The stories about Nibali putting pressure on him are rubbish.
I'm too busy rooting against Sky anyway. And I believe in Karma: destiny owes him one. Kruijswijk will be a factor, what will the outcome be? I wish him the (second
) best.
I don't really know either, but his Valdobbiane time trial was impressive, so thats probably why. However, that was at the start of the 3rd week where Kruisjwijk really got into his own that Giro and it was significantly longer which theoretically should suit him more (pretty much as hilly, probably a bit less).DFA123 said:Is Kruijswijk actually any good at flat and rolling TTs, like the ones in this Giro? Just been looking through his results and he's never done anything special - in fact, they are no better than Quintana's results, especially in GTs. Where's the expectation coming from that 70km of flat/rolling TTs are a good thing for him? I can clearly see why they suit Dumoulin and Pinot, maybe even Thomas. But I don't get the Kruijswijk TT hype. He doesn't have the most aero bone structure after all!
Yeah, that's about where I would put him based on his results. Somewhere around the same level as Quintana and Nibali. Competent, and can hold his own against most riders, but is certainly not going to gain significant time there.Valv.Piti said:I don't really know either, but his Valdobbiane time trial was impressive, so thats probably why. However, that was at the start of the 3rd week where Kruisjwijk really got into his own that Giro and it was significantly longer which theoretically should suit him more (pretty much as hilly, probably a bit less).DFA123 said:Is Kruijswijk actually any good at flat and rolling TTs, like the ones in this Giro? Just been looking through his results and he's never done anything special - in fact, they are no better than Quintana's results, especially in GTs. Where's the expectation coming from that 70km of flat/rolling TTs are a good thing for him? I can clearly see why they suit Dumoulin and Pinot, maybe even Thomas. But I don't get the Kruijswijk TT hype. He doesn't have the most aero bone structure after all!
So there's that. I think his level is about Quintana's, maybe slightly better (?) lets see, but he is by no means a specialist.
Well that's also a bit harsch, considering good giro in 2011 and 2015 already.SeriousSam said:Confirmed one hit wonder
SeriousSam said:Confirmed one hit wonder
Arredondo said:Had an unique chance. Didn't take it. Will regret that his entire life.
movingtarget said:Arredondo said:Had an unique chance. Didn't take it. Will regret that his entire life.
He was in the form of his life and not to take advantage of it will probably haunt him.
You could see it in the earlier stages, just less sharp and less easy as last year. That Yorkshire crash is the main culprit.Valv.Piti said:Looks like Dekker Tifosi was right.
He can still pull a top-5 off easily, but thats not really a huge deal. The stage to Bormio or Piancavallo should be his goal, he really needs a stage win in this race. So bittersweet that he didn't even get one last year.
