- Apr 7, 2010
- 77
- 0
- 0
i use to ride with a buddy of mine that use a regular watch and feel to do a HR test...is that better then a PM....
			
			fabramowski said:FrankDay....the earth is flat....get over it...when you can achieve what Dr. Coggan has let us know....it like he said she said...blah, blah.........
Boeing said:why is every coachfargo reply a bloody press conference with herself?
Elagabalus said:Brother, you don't know the half of it!
Google A. Coggan and Frank Day. They've apparently been chasing each other around for years-through the internet (on at least three other forums!) and half the galaxy. They've broken the space-time continuum.
Martin318is said:"To win this event a rider needs to do 18Watts per Kg in the first 8 seconds and then sustain 8 watts per kg for the remaining distance"
Who ever says:
"To win this event a rider needs to sustain 158 beats per minute" (or some similar value)
fabramowski said:i use to ride with a buddy of mine that use a regular watch and feel to do a HR test...is that better then a PM....
function said:In the above example, looks like an individual pursuit, it is perfectly valid and common to use a clock/pace to determine the demands of the event. Do you think this is not the case?
Jeroen Swart said:However, I see you have some Kiwi followers who like to emulate your less controlled self. Sincere flattery, no doubt.
Using a Power meter is a better way to train. Just don't get caught up trying to do constant power intervals. Despite all Andy's protestations, the reality is that most athletes and most coaches prescribe power based intervals at constant workload.
I know all that. I have been sparring with Coggan for many years and with Fergie for just a few. I understand their tactics and that it is "impossible" to "win". However, the person who does not have the academic background and training to understand this stuff on their own need to understand that there is more than one way to look at this stuff and nobody can point to any study to prove their way is the best way.Jeroen Swart said:Frank:
You will never win this argument. It is akin to trying to convert an Al-quaida footsoldier to Judaism. It won't be happening with sound reasoning.
And when you do put forth a convincing point, you will be ridiculed and denegrated.
CoachFergie said:Good to see you set such a high standard from the outset with your first post that included a jibe at Andy and some pretty blatant name dropping, appeals to authority and celebrity endorsement. Very professional.
A Doctor and a Exercise Physiologist and like Frank you don't understand that a power meter is a measurement tool not a training method. That you can't recognise this even your own study that showed nothing more than interval training being more effective than JRA is probably why it was bumped down to JSCR.
Jeroen Swart said:Hamish, you do yourself no favours with your lack of civility and blatantly disrespectful comments.
Does referring to the work of Lucia constitute name dropping? If that is the case, I see you've been doing it all day with regards to Nimmerichter. It is called citing. Even on a forum.
Furthermore, you insult all the researchers who have published in what is a fairly good journal, never mind the insult you keep throwing at the editors. This from an individual who (as far as I can ascertain) hasnt published even a single manuscript. Perhaps you should wait until you have just a little credibility before being so flippant.
If you want to debate a point, use sound reasoning and logic. Don't lower yourself to being a thug who believes that insults and intimidation will convince anyone with a real interest in the topic.
CoachFergie said:Very professional. Like Frank, attack me rather than the comments I have made.
Jeroen,Jeroen Swart said:Perhaps you should make a meaningful comment, rather than bashing semantics.
FrankDay said:I know all that. I have been sparring with Coggan for many years and with Fergie for just a few. I understand their tactics and that it is "impossible" to "win". However, the person who does not have the academic background and training to understand this stuff on their own need to understand that there is more than one way to look at this stuff and nobody can point to any study to prove their way is the best way.
I consider Coggan an academic bully. This type is pretty common in medicine. These folks are very well educated but are totally incapable of having a "normal" back and forth on any issue they hold a strong view about (which in Coggan's case seems to be just about everything) with anyone they consider to be the least bit inferior. If someone is making a point they disagree with they tend to attack them personally or professionally rather than discussing the issues and evidence. My background pretty much allows me to match him in almost every category and I simply refuse to allow him (an his minions) to dominate these issues. It wouldn't matter if I had nothing to sell, I would still be here. The fact that I do have a product complicates my mission but since there is no one else who seems willing to take him on, I am here. At least I don't follow him to the "Wattage forum". I just decided to let those folks to keep congratulating each other on how smart and good looking they all are.
Anyhow, I am so glad you did this study. As with most good studies it opens up more new questions than it answered. Hopefully your study and debates such as this will stimulate many more studies along this line (and many other lines such as you indicated in an earlier post). Knowledge is power. Lack of knowledge requires guessing.
Jeroen Swart said:Frank, I leave the fight to you.
I really have better things to do on a Friday night and in general.
I really love Hamish's last comment. After throwing insults for 2 days, he plays the victim when one responds to his insults. He can now add "hypocrite" to his resume too.
Over and out!
durianrider said:Getting a power meter (power tap) was the BEST product Ive ever bought for my cycling.
I mean you dont get a better way to train out on the road. Ive been smashing my pb's up timed climbs since having a powermeter. Its motivated me to eat even more carbs, less fat, get more early nights, stay hydrated and train with purpose. All of which equate to more fun. Cos at the end of the day, fun is what its about.
oldborn said:Some people really getting nervous without reason.
They are learning about sport for decades, but whole century would not be enough to understand something about it.
That is way i am happy that humans have a limited time to live.
My wife is stuck with her own American version of what not to wear almost every day.Boeing said:There is a great show on TV called what not to wear. I like the british version better.
Yes, most people would describe a 36:49 10km as smokin'. Congrats.oldborn said:And i must stop smoking 36min49sec on 10km running is not bad for 38. years old smoker.
My Vo2Max would not getting higher but anyway i am wondering
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		