• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 963 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,283
9,407
17,180
YavorD said:
Well, Merckx did it against Gimondi (you know one of the few people to win all the 3 GT's) and De Vlaeminck among others.
Both of them are all time greats.

Oh, and someone tries to pi** on the fields, he/she can say the same about Pogacar last year, can't he/she?
"Whom he did it against? Skujins, Bardet, DFM/50 years old Thomas, injured Vingegaard, O'Connor and only Lombardia had a decent competition in Evenepoel."

See how it goes? Poor opposition can work both ways.
Click to expand...
Oh please... top riders raced every single important race, there wasn't any specialization. Even Merckx told he wasn't the best climber. Nowadays, how many GTs can you win if you are not the best climber in the race? Probably zero
 
  • Like
Reactions: James M and Shortcut
Y

YavorD

Jul 8, 2017
1,238
1,582
13,680
Peyroteo94 said:
Oh please... top riders raced every single important race, there wasn't any specialization. Even Merckx told he wasn't the best climber. Nowadays, how many GTs can you win if you are not the best climber in the race? Probably zero
Click to expand...

Yup. And Merckx was the best among other all time greats, wasn't he?
While there are certain differences in the level of sport acting like Merckx did it against random plumbers and cab drivers is simply wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece
Tymek

Tymek

Feb 1, 2023
142
230
2,230
Peyroteo94 said:
Hell of the north is full hectic race, 50 kph in tight cobbled roads, crashes, suffer, fear and glory. Pure cycling! My favourite race in the world!
Click to expand...
Honestly i hate this race and only thing I care about this year is Pog starts or not.
Maybe it's bit controversial, but for me crashes and all this stuff is the last thing i want to watch in cycling.
What defines cycling for me is Tour. The most important is the best one. I watch every important race throghout the year and only Tour makes me exciting in a diffrent way.
 
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,283
9,407
17,180
Tymek said:
Honestly i hate this race and only thing I care about this year is Pog starts or not.
Maybe it's bit controversial, but for me crashes and all this stuff is the last thing i want to watch in cycling.
What defines cycling for me is Tour. The most important is the best one. I watch every important race throghout the year and only Tour makes me exciting in a diffrent way.
Click to expand...
Hating PR is like hating cycling, sorry!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and scribers
Peyroteo94

Peyroteo94

Mar 20, 2022
6,283
9,407
17,180
hayneplane said:
The spread of nationalities at the top in that era is like Cyclocross now.

Hard to treat CX as being in the same conversation as road cycling when you rarely see more than 2 of the top 15 finishers be from a nation other than Belgium or the Netherlands.
Click to expand...
Yeah. How can anyone say cycling in that era was as tough as this era when we see results from RVV and 8/9 riders are from Belgium...
No one is taking away what Merckx achieved but thinking he would in this era as successful as he was in the 60/70's is just crazy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hayneplane and James M
Y

YavorD

Jul 8, 2017
1,238
1,582
13,680
Peyroteo94 said:
But for example classics were like belgian national championship.
Click to expand...

And what? If the 10th belgian back then was better than Pedersen now, the competition has been really stiff.

It literally doesn't matter how many nations do you have. All that matters is the level of the top 3 or 5 riders.
If we rate de Vlaeminck higher than Van Der Poel, then Merckx had a tough competition as well
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan and James M
James M

James M

Jun 17, 2024
865
1,837
5,180
YavorD said:
And what? If the 10th belgian back then was better than Pedersen now, the competition has been really stiff.

It literally doesn't matter how many nations do you have. All that matters is the level of the top 3 or 5 riders.
If we rate de Vlaeminck higher than Van Der Poel, then Merckx had a tough competition as well
Click to expand...
You need to seriously stop trying to compare that era to today, you cant be serious and do that. Cycling has become so much more profesional, bigger it literally was a joke compared to today..

Go back as recent as 2010 to today its night and day in terms of profesionalism even and to go back as 60/70 and try to argue the level of the sport is as competetive as today ? What are we doing here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: snipeheem, Sandisfan and Shortcut
Y

YavorD

Jul 8, 2017
1,238
1,582
13,680
James M said:
You need to seriously stop trying to compare that era to today, you cant be serious and do that. Cycling has become so much more profesional, bigger it literally was a joke compared to today..

Go back as recent as 2010 to today its night and day in terms of profesionalism even and to go back as 60/70 and try to argue the level of the sport is as competetive as today ? What are we doing here.
Click to expand...
You started comparing eras when you asked "whom Merckx did it against".

Well your simple answer is - all time greats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
James M

James M

Jun 17, 2024
865
1,837
5,180
Netserk said:
Telling others what they need to do would carry more weight if you followed through and stopped so as well.
Click to expand...
YavorD said:
You started comparing eras when you asked "whom Merckx did it against".

Well your simple answer is - all time greats.
Click to expand...
I never said any of this nonsene. Its like saying Kristoff is better than WVA cause he won RVV igoring the competition and try to defend it, you never get the right answer that way, but by all means go on.

Im not even gonne entertain the discussion , I dont care, comparing that era to today and watching cycling with all we know today and seriously think that era is as competetive as today, then its literally no point. All I said its self-explanatory im sorry if that hurts someone feelings, but it is as common sense as it gets. The end.
 
Y

YavorD

Jul 8, 2017
1,238
1,582
13,680
James M said:
I never said any of this nonsene. Its like saying Kristoff is better than WVA cause he won RVV igoring the competition and try to defend it, you never get the right answer that way, but by all means go on.

Im not even gonne entertain the discussion , I dont care, comparing that era to today and watching cycling with all we know today and seriously think that era is as competetive as today, then its literally no point. All I said its self-explanatory im sorry if that hurts someone feelings, but it is as common sense as it gets. The end.
Click to expand...
But you're the one who compared eras and relevant competitions.
Anyway, fair enough.
We wont compare eras and riders Merckx won against. We will only compare palmares from now on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece
James M

James M

Jun 17, 2024
865
1,837
5,180
YavorD said:
But you're the one who compared eras and relevant competitions.
Anyway, fair enough.
We wont compare eras and riders Merckx won against. We will only compare palmares from now on.
Click to expand...
Do that if it helps fit your narrative, its all what that talk is about anyway no matter what you think, it comes down to what you value more and thats fine I never said anything else did I, its not based on facts unlike the best wheres it factual. Its all good. Merckx is great I dont think anyone said anything different anytime.

Its better to compare that than to compare the competetiveness of the different eras at least, which shouldnt be needed to having to be explained.
 
Netserk

Netserk

Apr 30, 2011
42,846
24,629
28,180
James M said:
Do that if it helps fit you narrative, its all what that talk is about anyway no matter what you believe its comes down to what you value more and thats fine I never said anything else did I, its not based on facts unlike the best wheres it factual. Its all good. Merckx is great I dont think anyone said anything different anytime.

Its better to compare that than to compare the competetiveness of the different eras at least, which shouldnt be needed to having to be explained.
Click to expand...
Hmm:
James M said:
Cycling has become so much more profesional, bigger it literally was a joke compared to today
Click to expand...
 
Y

YavorD

Jul 8, 2017
1,238
1,582
13,680
James M said:
Do that if it helps fit you narrative, its all what that talk is about anyway no matter what you believe its comes down to what you value more and thats fine I never said anything else did I, its not based on facts unlike the best wheres it factual. Its all good. Merckx is great I dont think anyone said anything different anytime.

Its better to compare that than to compare the competetiveness of the different eras at least, which shouldnt be needed to having to be explained.
Click to expand...

Ending the discussion here.
You said that I shouldn't compare eras (and competitiveness) so you shouldn't as well.
All that we can compare then is palmares.

Or we won't compare anything and we can agree there's no GOAT just best rider in a certain era.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece and James M
James M

James M

Jun 17, 2024
865
1,837
5,180
YavorD said:
Ending the discussion here.
You said that I shouldn't compare eras (and competitiveness) so you shouldn't as well.
All that we can compare then is palmares.

Or we won't compare anything and we can agree there's no GOAT just best rider in a certain era.
Click to expand...
Sorry but saying its self-explanatory why we cant compare this era to that is common sense wether or not it hurts your feelings and will still be the case wether or not you like it. You do whatever you like and defend it if you will, its still dosent change the fact that its not comparable.

Next part you say is just personal preference how you value things, will never be black and white alone, its more complex than that, Its a reason Jordan is considered the goat in basketball and not Russell. But yeah its all personal preference not with a necessary right or wrong answer.

That last part is the most correct answer and factual way of doing that part.
 
Lequack

Lequack

Jul 10, 2014
14,118
23,287
28,180
What a nice couple

GjrYR9IXAAA2FlP
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom