Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread

Page 559 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
For race organizer to give you a jersey to wear and you after being disqualified for it by UCI? Good luck with that.
Technically the rules dont work like that. A car gives you a pull up the mountain, it's the rider who gets fined/dq even if not his teams car doing it, or a fan pushing them. Same legal framework as anti-doping basically. ie it's the riders responsibility.
I really hope they look at it from other podium contenders perspective. Nobody wants to win from others DQ over wrongly coloured skinsuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
53,943
44,328
28,180
Isn't it confirmed it was meant as a tribute to Torino, which means it was a one off thing he probably didn't get permission for?

Makes sense to get fined for that.
 
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
Technically the rules dont work like that. A car gives you a pull up the mountain, it's the rider who gets fined/dq even if not his teams car doing it, or a fan pushing them. Same legal framework as anti-doping basically. ie it's the riders responsibility.
I really hope they look at it from other podium contenders perspective. Nobody wants to win from others DQ over wrongly coloured skinsuit.

Not even remotely similar. On that occasion a mandatory video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E4vRtC7IcY
 
  • Love
Reactions: DoYouEvenRideBruh
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
https://www.cyclingnews.com/news/ju...tone-maglia-rosa-skinsuit-with-purple-shorts/
"RCS Sport and people from Castelli tried to explain to the UCI commissaires that their own rules appear to allow the two-tone coloured skin suit but the race officials preferred to wait for senior officials at the UCI and perhaps even President David Lappartient to make a final decision. "

What a palaver!
Relax, it's like when it comes to safety. All you need to do is point a finger to some other person/organisation and it settles down after.
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
Not even remotely similar. On that occasion a mandatory video:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E4vRtC7IcY
I'm talking about the fact that rules apply in cycling even if it's not your fault for breaking them. Same as anti-doping. You eat something prohibited accidentally and test positive, it's almost impossible to escape a sanction, the rider is responsible. You get squeezed onto a footpath avoiding a dog but pedetrians on that footbath you will be DQ or fined even if not your fault.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Sandisfan
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
I'm talking about the fact that rules apply in cycling even if it's not your fault for breaking them. Same as anti-doping. You eat something prohibited accidentally and test positive, it's almost impossible to escape a sanction, the rider is responsible. You get squeezed onto a footpath avoiding a dog but pedetrians on that footbath you will be DQ or fined even if not your fault.

Nop, this has nothing to do with doping and Pogi can't be responsible for it. At best the organiser will pay a fine if any.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Nov 16, 2013
26,686
27,792
28,180
I think if he had ridden 1 or 2 kilometres with those bibs, he could stay in the race. But he kept riding with them for more than 160 ks. Should be kicked out.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Sandisfan and Lui98
Apr 14, 2021
1,598
3,010
10,180
I'm talking about the fact that rules apply in cycling even if it's not your fault for breaking them. Same as anti-doping. You eat something prohibited accidentally and test positive, it's almost impossible to escape a sanction, the rider is responsible. You get squeezed onto a footpath avoiding a dog but pedetrians on that footbath you will be DQ or fined even if not your fault.
This is not a good analogy - because in this particular case, the outfit was provided by race organisers. It is 100% their responsibility to provide an outfit according to the rulebook and not Pogs or the teams.

It is like getting disqualified because the organisers drove illegal motorbikes. That’s the analogy here…
 
Mar 4, 2011
8,447
11,174
23,180
Gonna be tough for the UCI as the regulations have always been DQ or Elimination. In fact they added to the rule in January where it also comes with a 50 to 2000 fine. I'm guessing they'll only fine him given it was RCS decision to break the rules technically but done so in good faith it seems. But that would set a new precedent that race organisers could try all sorts of things for marketing purposes and simply absorb the riders fines as a cost.
Just like Nike did with the Air Jordan ( at least according to the film “Air”): Nike decided they would simply ignore the standard restrictions (on shoe color) and pay the penalty fee each time Jordan wore them in a game. The fee was minor compared to the marketing budget, and the controversy about their decision was like free advertising for the shoe. Great example of thinking outside the (shoe)box ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Oct 4, 2020
1,699
1,863
8,680
Like it or not singling out the UCI seems rather harsh.
Most sports have similar rules, I've been DQ from local cross country league for a running vest logo infringement.
Look at motor racing, even more so .
 
Mar 13, 2013
4,857
903
17,680
Nop, this has nothing to do with doping and Pogi can't be responsible for it. At best the organiser will pay a fine if any.
I'm not saying it does. The rules are based on the same legal framework and how sports law and the rules that determine it get applied. Strict liability, look it up.
What does happen though is UCI, race comms and the jury have discretion on applying their own rules or not ie they don't have to, even though they're written down. We see that balance all the time and think that will happen here with a fine only which was brought in in Januarys rules.
 
Mar 20, 2022
13,336
18,084
22,180
He was safe again for the second day. Tomorrow is the last stage where massive crashes are more frequents. Wish him the best!! Go Go Pogi!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Feb 20, 2012
982
229
10,380
If the rules say: “The wearer of the leader's jersey shall be entitled to match the colour of his shorts to that of the jersey,”, it leaves a lot open to interpretation, in my understanding. Is the "matching" colour strictly the same as the jersey? Or is any colour which "matches", i.e.fits, with the jersey allowed?

Based on Cambridge dictionary, both interpretations are possible:
If two colours ... match, they are similar or look attractive together:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
Apr 14, 2021
1,598
3,010
10,180
Organisers shouldn't be providing a classification kit....it's an outdated system - what other sport would this happen? Absolute nonsense......
Alpine skiing and - you guessed it - ski jumping 😉 well, starting numbers have different background colour at least…
 
May 29, 2019
11,210
11,702
23,180
I'm not saying it does. The rules are based on the same legal framework and how sports law and the rules that determine it get applied. Strict liability, look it up.
What does happen though is UCI, race comms and the jury have discretion on applying their own rules or not ie they don't have to, even though they're written down. We see that balance all the time and think that will happen here with a fine only which was brought in in Januarys rules.

No. UCI can't fine Pogi in this case and if by any chance they would try to, then Pogi can still take them to CAS and win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan