*checks who won that last year*2018 was cold and rainy but it cleared up in the finale.
*decides it is not worth to imply luck was involved*
*checks who won that last year*2018 was cold and rainy but it cleared up in the finale.
Doubtful, as they would then have to have the same opinion for the same sort of thing independent on what rider they are talking about.Let's see (as @Salvarani said) if MVP will get half of criticism Pogacar got for being in the break.
They've all done 6 hour cold rainy races it's nothing special. It's still zone 1.So pretty much none of the current crop of contenders have ever ridden that distance in bad weather or had to cope with the Poggio descent in very sketchy conditions.
A standard that a number of people hereabouts would find it difficult to adhere to.Doubtful, as they would then have to have the same opinion for the same sort of thing independent on what rider they are talking about.
I think if it would rain the whole time during the race it would affect the riders a lot.They've all done 6 hour cold rainy races it's nothing special. It's still zone 1.
Rain makes a difference physiologically, but they've all done such efforts.
Wet Poggio descent does make a difference.
The obvious answer is that he would have won Paris Roubaix..a coveted win that most riders find significant, and age. Many parts of Pogacar history will possibly happen before 27th birthdayBut what is the difference of doing PR now or in 2/3 years?
But we will have rain on Saturday?So pretty much none of the current crop of contenders have ever ridden that distance in bad weather or had to cope with the Poggio descent in very sketchy conditions.
I would love to have a time machine to go after Pogacar's retirement and see people's opinion.Doubtful, as they would then have to have the same opinion for the same sort of thing independent on what rider they are talking about.
I would love to have a time machine to go after Pogacar's retirement and see people's opinion.
My point is: when Manie was introduced, we also had a unpredictable race.You will probably have some people complaining about route change and that would be understandable.
That, however, is not needed (let alone necessary) now, as MSR is likely the most competitive, unpredictable and interesting monument right now. With the widest set of riders, with different skills having a chance to win it.
Le Manie isn't in the final, and the most impact it had was splits through crashes on the descent.My point is: when Manie was introduced, we also had a unpredictable race.
My point is: when Manie was introduced, we also had a unpredictable race.
Every race makes tweaks and every race does it. All the monuments and other races has had major changes over the years.But we have it now as well. What you're asking for now is to change a winning formula.
Also, I bet you and Salvarani wouldn't be half as vocal about a route change if Pogacar won the race twice so far, so that's how opinions vary depending on situation.
Exactly! It can be a interesting point in the race without being decisive at all. Teams can attack there but without it, we have 270 km of nothingLe Manie isn't in the final, and the most impact it had was splits through crashes on the descent.
You cant change even one km of MSR going forward, while other monuments changes the finishing town and route altogether to mix it up every now and then.Exactly! It can be a interesting point in the race without being decisive at all. Teams can attack there but without it, we have 270 km of nothing
Yavor, I always was very critical about removing Manie. This race needs more opportunities for attackers to be successful without jeopardizing sprinters (who can climb well) opportunities.But we have it now as well. What you're asking for now is to change a winning formula.
Also, I bet you and Salvarani wouldn't be half as vocal about a route change if Pogacar won the race twice so far, so that's how opinions vary depending on situation.
Last time Manie was in MSR we where in 2013, 12 years ago.My point is: when Manie was introduced, we also had a unpredictable race.
It has been in the race before, just because it was a while ago doesnt mean they cant do it again at some point. It is up to the organizer.Yavor, I always was very critical about removing Manie. This race needs more opportunities for attackers to be successful without jeopardizing sprinters (who can climb well) opportunities.
For example, Cavendish won MSR with Manie in the race.
I'm very critical about the addition of Cauberg as the last climb (like in the Gilbert era) and this will make even a more predictable and suited race to Pogacar. So this doesn't have anything to do with Pogacar.
Winning formula? Do you remember how people were upset with removing Manie and not introducing Pompeiana?But we have it now as well. What you're asking for now is to change a winning formula.
Also, I bet you and Salvarani wouldn't be half as vocal about a route change if Pogacar won the race twice so far, so that's how opinions vary depending on situation.
Why demare can't have a opportunity to win a monument?Winning formula? Do you remember how people were upset with removing Manie and not introducing Pompeiana?
What winning formula? A race that allows Demare to have a opportunity to win a monument should be automatically changed.
They would probably want to remove Cipressa as well if they could.Winning formula? Do you remember how people were upset with removing Manie and not introducing Pompeiana?
What winning formula? A race that allows Demare to have a opportunity to win a monument should be automatically changed.
Winning formula? Do you remember how people were upset with removing Manie and not introducing Pompeiana?
What winning formula? A race that allows Demare to have a opportunity to win a monument should be automatically changed.
I think Cipressa was introduced in 1982 so we have more editions without Cipressa than with Cipressa. I don't get why people get too attached to MSR's route.They would probably want to remove Cipressa as well if they could.