Merckx in 69’ his first tour win, and the last one where he could climb at his peak due to injury, won the tour by 18 minutes from 2nd place Roger Pingeon, Pingeon had won the tour in 67’ and beaten Ocana to the Vuelta in 69’.
Merckx won 7 stages including the team time trial, won all three individual TT’s and came second in the prologue.
He won the mountains, points and combativity classifications.
In the same year he won San remo, Paris-nice, flanders and liege.
Pog can dream of such dominance
Merckx won 7 stages including the team time trial, won all three individual TT’s and came second in the prologue.
He won the mountains, points and combativity classifications.
In the same year he won San remo, Paris-nice, flanders and liege.
Pog can dream of such dominance
So, how is he better than MVDP? And how did Eddy beat him almost every time then? I agree that merckx was an alien but comparing him to modern cycling is unfair. We should not do comparisons almost 50 years apart...
Imagine what Tarling, Ganna or Evenepoel would do to Merckx... Probably, by your admission, he would beat them all...
- May 22, 2024
- 514
- 723
- 3,780
- Oct 30, 2023
- 5,309
- 8,187
- 15,180
If this is what it takes to bring a long inspired career from pogi, keep the proclamations going
cyclinguptodate.com
“You’d have to combine Pogacar, Van der Poel, Cavendish & Evenepoel to surpass my dad” — Axel Merckx certain about cycling’s G.O.A.T.
In the current era of cycling, Tadej Pogacar is frequently hailed as the new benchmark, a rider with the potential to rewrite history. Yet Axel Merckx, son of the legendary Eddy Merckx, remains measur...
cyclinguptodate.com
Cookster15
Moderator
- May 14, 2011
- 6,173
- 6,677
- 23,180
Of course, but I think you would agree that the competition is a little tougher in 2025 than it was back in 1969? And 2024 by Pogacar was comparable to Merckyx's arguably best year of 1974.
Pog 2025 is on track to be a similar level as last season. He didn't do the Giro but easily beat an uninjured Vingegaard at the TdF and won pretty much everything else except Amstel and P-R in which he still came 2nd and MSR where he came 3rd. Even in 1974 Merckyx didn't win everything.
And for Pogacar MVDP is the equivalent competition of De Vlaeminck to Merckyx.
Eddy Merckx
Eddy Merckx (born 1945-06-17 in Meensel-Kiezegem) is a former professional road racing cyclist from Belgium, active between 1964 and 1978 and widely recognized as the greatest rider of all time. Among his biggest achievements are 5 wins in the Tour de France as well as 34 stage wins.
www.procyclingstats.com
Maybe we shouldn’t, but if so many say Tadej is the goat, then it invites a discussion, I think?
In my opinion, unless Tadej keeps on his trajectory for maybe 4 more years, it will be Merckx as goat.
De Vlaeminck was better for me because he won all of the monuments, at this moment in time has more monuments (Van der poel can overtake him still) and did it all while racing against the best cyclist of all time. (Merckx)
Eddy didn’t beat him every time, he was somewhat like Van der poel is for Pogacar, but there were actually other riders who could mix it with them as well, not like now where it seems to be becoming the Pogacar v Van der poel show.
Possibly, I guess we’ll never know. Merckx did remarkably well to still win on the mountains after his accident, Pog wouldn’t have it all his own way against a 69 Merckx.
Merckx was though the best time triallist of his era, and could mix it with the sprinters as well. Pog is neither the best time trialler of his generation or capable of mixing it with the sprinters.
I think he would, sure. He was generally the best time triallist throughout his reign, Pogacar at the moment is second to Remco.
Merckx also has an hour record. He was a dominant tter. Pogacar is actually possibly the only one of Anquetil, Eddy, Hinault, Indurain etc who isn’t the best tter, because Remco is slightly better than him.
- Mar 20, 2022
- 13,245
- 18,013
- 22,180
- May 22, 2024
- 514
- 723
- 3,780
Pog is a beast on the climbs sure, put him in the 70s with what Merckx had would he be the same rider ? No he wouldn’t
- May 22, 2024
- 514
- 723
- 3,780
No he wouldnot be the same rider,otherwise he would won by 30 minutes.he would destroy them in gts and easy competative on flat,lol.
He’s a great climber for sure, it wouldn’t be the same in the 70s though.
Think of overall talent, Merckx was the best climber until he was injured, he was still arguably the best after this, he was the best tter, a capable sprinter, could beat the best on the cobbles and on the hilly monuments.
Pogacar is the best climber,but he isn’t the best tter, he isn’t a great sprinter, hasn’t shown he can beat the best on the cobbles.
As a pure climber? Well without going in to the clinic , yes he’s great, possibly better than Merckx ? In ever other area Merckx is the better rider. This is shown by Pog only having more Lombardies and nothing else.
Once again the strength in depth in Merckx time was much higher, I’ll take Gimondi, Poulidor and Zoetemelk over Vingegaard and Remco.
As an overall rider Merckx is simply light years ahead of Pogacar.
Pogacars only rival in the tour, a rival who’s won almost nothing else, cracked him twice and beat him..
He crashed through nobody else’s fault in an innocuous situation trying to keep up with Van der poel at Roubaix…Van der poel a rider who is not even as good as eddys main rival in the classics…
He crashed through nobody else’s fault in an innocuous situation trying to keep up with Van der poel at Roubaix…Van der poel a rider who is not even as good as eddys main rival in the classics…
Cookster15
Moderator
- May 14, 2011
- 6,173
- 6,677
- 23,180
- May 22, 2024
- 514
- 723
- 3,780
- Oct 30, 2023
- 5,309
- 8,187
- 15,180
Merckx had a huge engine, so let's not go too crazy trying to figure out which rider had the better qualities. It's pointless really.
Merckx was far and away stronger mentally to the point of psychotic. After everything and Pogi's career done, I will be looking at this personally when comparing the two.
Merckx was far and away stronger mentally to the point of psychotic. After everything and Pogi's career done, I will be looking at this personally when comparing the two.
I’ve already said , Pogacar as a pure climber may possibly be better.
Against a 69 Merckx I don’t think Pogacar will beat him though.
And absolutely not , 8 grand tours vs 3 grand tours , no. Merckx raced against many proven grand tour winners and world champions, Pog races against Vingegaard, a , relatively poor tter, and next best is Remco , a guy who cannot even have a consistent season of cycling.
Merckx competition was simply better
I’ve already said he’s very talented , so what? He has every chance to compare to Merckx if he keeps going, but he’s talking of retirement.
Bartali won the tour ten years apart, maybe he was more talented than both? Such is life.
Merckx dominated much more with a long term injury. At the moment, Pog is not fit to lace his toe straps.
No, the competition is way much better and specialised today compared with Merckx era.
- May 22, 2024
- 514
- 723
- 3,780
TRENDING THREADS
-
World Championship 2025: Men’s RR, September 28- Started by Berniece
- Replies: 2K
-
Teams & Riders The Remco Evenepoel is the next Eddy Merckx thread- Started by DNP-Old
- Replies: 36K
-
Teams & Riders Tadej Pogačar discussion thread- Started by Lequack
- Replies: 41K
-
Il Lombardia 2025, monument, October 11- Started by Krzysztof_O
- Replies: 792
-
Teams & Riders The Great Big Cycling Transfers, Extensions, and Rumours Thread- Started by RedheadDane
- Replies: 13K
-
European Championship 2025: Men’s RR, October 5- Started by Berniece
- Replies: 854
-
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram