- May 22, 2024
- 544
- 736
- 3,780
So you are saying,if you add 450 ballers in 60s wont change anything.well better not from slovenia lol.
This post is so wrong on many ways, it's hard to even counter this but let's do it.
In a universe of 500 riders, the chance of having good competition is higher compared to an universe of 40 riders and if you are so good that have no competition in a universe of 500 riders, it's because you are an outlier. You don't need to be such an outlier to be the best in a universe of 40 riders, specially when those 40 riders don't specialise in anything and race everything you race.
Without Pogacar, Jonas would have 5 TdFs wins. And he wouldn't have really problems to win it next 2 years. He would be seen as LA in his days and the gap to others would be the same as in times of LA. And then imagine there would be someone who would beat LA without any problems-that guy would have been seen as unreal and 100% GOAT. You want to say gap to others needs to be small if you want to be GOAT. Like in world of no Tadej and Jonas, Remco would have been seen in that case as a GOAT, since he would win a lot of races including TdF and because he would have problems with Lipowitz, Onley, Roglic, Almeida, Ayuso, Del Toro so he would have a "great competition".But the sheer number of riders isn't too relevant. The level of the best 5 riders (who could be competitive) is far more important than the sheer number.
If you don't have Vingegaard in the Tour, you don't have competition and it doesn't matter how many riders you have.
You are confusing dominance with lack of competitionAnd nowadays monuments are race between 2 riders. If Evenepoel is in good shape, you can say 3..
Yeeeeah, the competition is oooo big these days that 2 risers have won 16 monuments between them. In the last 5 years.
One of the best post on this forum ever.Without Pogacar, Jonas would have 5 TdFs wins. And he wouldn't have really problems to win it next 2 years. He would be seen as LA in his days and the gap to others would be the same as in times of LA. And then imagine there would be someone who would beat LA without any problems-that guy would have been seen as unreal and 100% GOAT. You want to say gap to others needs to be small if you want to be GOAT. Like in world of no Tadej and Jonas, Remco would have been seen in that case as a GOAT, since he would win a lot of races including TdF and because he would have problems with Lipowitz, Onley, Roglic, Almeida, Ayuso, Del Toro so he would have a "great competition".
The legs might still be good, but is the spark fading? Pogačar’s been sounding world-weary since his case of the mid-summer blues at the Tour de France.
With victory on Saturday, he’ll end the season with 20 wins, the most in the elite men’s peloton for the third time in his career.
He became the first rider to win back-to-back Tour de France-world championship double, and could finish on the podium of all five monuments in one season.
It's just simple maths, if you are the best by far from a group of 500 professional riders, it's way more difficult and unique than being the best (by far) from a group of 40 riders. The percentile where Pogacar is, is not the same from where Merckx is. How does he not get it?Without Pogacar, Jonas would have 5 TdFs wins. And he wouldn't have really problems to win it next 2 years. He would be seen as LA in his days and the gap to others would be the same as in times of LA. And then imagine there would be someone who would beat LA without any problems-that guy would have been seen as unreal and 100% GOAT. You want to say gap to others needs to be small if you want to be GOAT. Like in world of no Tadej and Jonas, Remco would have been seen in that case as a GOAT, since he would win a lot of races including TdF and because he would have problems with Lipowitz, Onley, Roglic, Almeida, Ayuso, Del Toro so he would have a "great competition".
It's just simple maths, if you are the best by far from a group of 500 professional riders, it's way more difficult and unique than being the best (by far) from a group of 40 riders. The percentile where Pogacar is, is not the same from where Merckx is. How does he not get it?
And in pro cycling, since the 90s, riders no longer race every race, they peak for specific races according their abilities. This makes Pogacar's dominance even more special.
We should vote at the end of the season about the best post of the year (I would like worst too for "comedy" but I'm not sure if mods allow that due to breaking forum rules).One of the best post on this forum ever.
No you don’t understand it. Pogacar is dominant, Merckx was even more dominant.There isn't competition because Pogacar is a big outlier, you don't get it, do you? This just shows why he is the best ever. Competition is way better but he is also way better, c'mon, it's not that hard...
If you can't understand simple maths is hard to discuss something with you (being the best from a sample of 500 is different from being the best from a sample of 40. Simple maths)
No you don’t understand it. Pogacar is dominant, Merckx was even more dominant.
Source?''After Vine’s leadout Pog went solo with ~4.5k to the top and took over a minute off his own Ganda KOM.''
Yea, its over''After Vine’s leadout Pog went solo with ~4.5k to the top and took over a minute off his own Ganda KOM.''
So we already know where he will attack.''After Vine’s leadout Pog went solo with ~4.5k to the top and took over a minute off his own Ganda KOM.''
Wilt was like shaq, zero ability to shoot.regarding wilt,sure segregation is much bigger factor than anything in cycling back in 60s,but wilt still greatest athlete ever in basketball,even mike look like chump against him.i will never fotrget when wilt and shaq shook hands,like toddler,lmao.not saying wilt is better baller though.
