• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tadej Pogacar and Mauro Giannetti

Page 222 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mauro Gianetti claims that Pog is only winning because Vingegaard is in bad shape. He said that Vingegaards last two wins had motivated Pog to become better and that is why he is so good this year.. its just motivation.

No need for clinic thread anymore.. we found the reason why his so good.. its just motivation.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Stablo and carolina
Very true, I think the reason why Sky got so much stick off the press and fans was because it was just after Lance came out, so us cycling fans were very sensitive.
I rather think it was because of them being obnoxious about being a clean team and others being more or less stupid when you just can improve with science and marginal gains. And this narrative annoyed me the hell out.
 
Bobby Julich was interesting on the WEDU youtube cast last night. Obvs the gains that he talks about would be in tandem with "medical" assistance. But it's a fairly good breakdown of why this generation is just so much faster ....every day...throughoutt the peloton.

Yes interesting to hear from a coach about how "fueling" has changed. And I don't think it can be discounted as some of the explanation, the problem I see though is that it does not account for the sudden jump in performance. Especially as it is around long enough to have already affected young riders significantly, who, as Julich claimed and I guess he'll know, are also going faster than ever before. But if it's a known known for a longer time than a few years, why did we see an explosion in such a short time? Also the gains that this needs to account for are bonkers, even if you factor in that maybe the training principles of old were wrong from the new perspective.
He also talked about new methods of regeneration, like ice bath etc., but this stuff has been around forever now and we didn't see Froome go up a hill remotely as close as Pogacar does and they at least lay claim to have been the first team to take this stuff really seriously.
So while Julich's take was very interesting to hear about, the main questions remain unsolved for me.
 
Yes interesting to hear from a coach about how "fueling" has changed. And I don't think it can be discounted as some of the explanation, the problem I see though is that it does not account for the sudden jump in performance. Especially as it is around long enough to have already affected young riders significantly, who, as Julich claimed and I guess he'll know, are also going faster than ever before. But if it's a known known for a longer time than a few years, why did we see an explosion in such a short time? Also the gains that this needs to account for are bonkers, even if you factor in that maybe the training principles of old were wrong from the new perspective.
He also talked about new methods of regeneration, like ice bath etc., but this stuff has been around forever now and we didn't see Froome go up a hill remotely as close as Pogacar does and they at least lay claim to have been the first team to take this stuff really seriously.
So while Julich's take was very interesting to hear about, the main questions remain unsolved for me.
Simple, nutrition and equipment alone cannot explain the ridiculous jumps in performance.
 
New propaganda just dropped.

Its called a Brain Coach
The interview from Nieuwsblad with the 'brain coach' is quite funny. Apparently the man in question, Stijn Quanten is his name, received his training from the (in)famous MilanLab. You know, the place where careers magically got extended and had alleged ties to Fuentes. Furthermore, he says Pogacar is an exceptional talent because he scores higher on several cognitive and emotional tests than Wayne Rooney. I mean, if he ain't the pinnacle of mental strength and fortitude I don't know who is.
 
Was in part the British that cannibalised Team Sky, lots of money, political/cultural capital, made on the back of their rise but they were absolutely loving it when they fell as well, parading Wiggo around on Andrew Marr was a highlight. You just wait until Jude Bellingham puts a foot wrong, they're already circling.

Whether the Slovenians, Dutch or Danes have a culture of eating their own I'm not entirely sure. Whatever brings these guys down will most likely be outside the cycling body politic because the current crop, outside of a few random Frenchmen don't have the brains or the bollocks to do anything.

I kind of think the press are already on a Bellingham feeding frenzy, alot of which feels manufactured. Sky always had that Murdoch connection, and now Ineos with Radcliffe, a sort of easy to attack figurehead connection, they probably get less grief for the cycling team currently because theyre in this not good enough anymore category, but you can see the amount of angst his Man Utd deal had, and then how much Ten Hag had to put up with, and the instant Brailsford appeared in the stands it was all about what does some guy from cycling know about football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tim Cahill
The interview from Nieuwsblad with the 'brain coach' is quite funny. Apparently the man in question, Stijn Quanten is his name, received his training from the (in)famous MilanLab. You know, the place where careers magically got extended and had alleged ties to Fuentes. Furthermore, he says Pogacar is an exceptional talent because he scores higher on several cognitive and emotional tests than Wayne Rooney. I mean, if he ain't the pinnacle of mental strength and fortitude I don't know who is.

I think my cat would score higher on cognitive and emotional tests than Wayne Rooney
 
Bobby Julich was interesting on the WEDU youtube cast last night. Obvs the gains that he talks about would be in tandem with "medical" assistance. But it's a fairly good breakdown of why this generation is just so much faster ....every day...throughoutt the peloton.
I thought the same and I don't doubt that newer fueling strategies are better. As others have noted, I don't see them explaining the big jumps in performance, across so many riders. Part of that skepticism is from knowing fuel is just part of a very complex set of inputs and the rest is from knowing that every single time someone put up a similar explanation in the past the bigger factor was doping.

Floyd Landis, via Antoine Vayer thinks:
"Here's my quote: marginal gains (the BS British version of "faster tires") has given way to maximum gains. At this point they should give Lance Armstrong his 7 jerseys back and maybe we can all just accept cycling for what it always was and what it will always be. I still love it, but from a distance. I don't want to be involved."

At this point I wonder if anyone cares whether the UCI acknowledges LAs wins or any of their other decisions on dopers anyway.