Really? That's a personal attack, I should probably report you...

Don't worry, I won't, but since the statement has been made, let us dwell on it a bit and briefly rationally analyze its slightly veiled message. I sense a clear innuendo at the so called "conspiracy theory" stereotype that's been steadily promoted by the mainstream media for what is now many decades. Everyone is familiar with it: its purpose is to create a negative connotation associated with believing in the existence of "conspiracies", i.e. any purposeful actions information about which is either not readily shared or deliberately concealed from the general public. Its form is generally humorous-sarcastic, with hyberbolization and appeal to emotions often employed to make the main premise sound more convincing. Two such widely used hyperboles is "tin hats" and, more recently, "flat earth".
Its positive content is usually implied and not stated explicitly but, if it were to be made such, it would sound like something along the lines of "there is total transparency everywhere, nothing is ever concealed from the public, all the official media content is always 100% truthful". As one can see, just stating the main premise of said stereotype in a positive way makes it immediately clear why it exists in the form it exists in: pretty much any sane and minimally competent person would consider it an insult to his or her intelligence if asked to put own signature under any statement of the type just mentioned. But can the negative form of the stereotype hold up to any rational scrutiny? Well, that also a rhetorical question isn't it? Indeed, it is not a secret for anyone paying even minimal attention to the surroundings that the main job of literally millions of people consists of nothing but conspiracies. Employees of such government agencies as CIA, NSA and such, to not even mention the bewildering multitude of various security firms, security departments of large corporations, holdings etc. get their monthly paycheck thereby feeding their families solely on the successes of their everyday conspiracy related activities.
Thus the "conspiracy theory" stereotype used in any rational discussion really serves the purpose of masking the lack of rational arguments where it usually fails anyway unless the said discussion is taken over by emotions.