IMO Lance was as bad as it gets as a dope but in the same league as the others and an extremely "bad" person compared to other top cyclists. Pog is just ruthless, but what I dislike in him is when he tries to play nice. Just be the ruthless self and write some history.In my opinion, there have been a few attempts to re-write Lance's history and paint him in a brighter light, but unfortunately the facts keep getting in the way.
What's the motive here? Lance wasn't so bad, so Pog is an angel?
Indeed.In my opinion, there have been a few attempts to re-write Lance's history and paint him in a brighter light, but unfortunately the facts keep getting in the way.
What's the motive here? Lance wasn't so bad, so Pog is an angel?
The longer time goes on Armstrong is at a distinct advantage to others involved. People still want to talk with him, so he does interviews and podcasts O'plenty and tells a version that is all softened up..something like.. Yes I was bad but so was everyone else. Which depending is true, but Armstrong often leaves out all his privilege and incredible benefits. His team wasn't being showered with endorsement offers and association BS like dating super models, Kate Hudson, Sheryl Crow, hanging with Matthew McCongnehy, Jake Gyletgall, Robin Williams.. everyone wanted to be around. Golden boy. And Armstrong sort of candy coats what he was willing to do to maintain that, keep that. So his version of everyone being the same doesn't really hold up unless they were riding bikes with the sitting President of their country or were flying in private jets everywhere. Sorry Lance, yes other riders could have been gassed equally but nobody was writing books about them, nobody was sending fat paychecks to option their story for movies and TV shows, books.In my opinion, there have been a few attempts to re-write Lance's history and paint him in a brighter light, but unfortunately the facts keep getting in the way.
What's the motive here? Lance wasn't so bad, so Pog is an angel?
Most of what you write is a consequence of being from the USA.The longer time goes on Armstrong is at a distinct advantage to others involved. People still want to talk with him, so he does interviews and podcasts O'plenty and tells a version that is all softened up..something like.. Yes I was bad but so was everyone else. Which depending is true, but Armstrong often leaves out all his privilege and incredible benefits. His team wasn't being showered with endorsement offers and association BS like dating super models, Kate Hudson, Sheryl Crow, hanging with Matthew McCongnehy, Jake Gyletgall, Robin Williams.. everyone wanted to be around. Golden boy. And Armstrong sort of candy coats what he was willing to do to maintain that, keep that. So his version of everyone being the same doesn't really hold up unless they were riding bikes with the sitting President of their country or were flying in private jets everywhere. Sorry Lance, yes other riders could have been gassed equally but nobody was writing books about them, nobody was sending fat paychecks to option their story for movies and TV shows, books.
And now as Lance stepped in multiple buckets of luck. After law enforcement and court system calmed down and he paid his fines..no prison, still left with a place to live, car to drive and critical, money in the bank. And with his leftover loot, made some bets on stuff like Uber and 2,3 other big hitters and the playoffs were huge. I don't know how many millions he made from Uber stock purchase..
Tadej still doesn't make as much money as Armstrong..
And there is very little buzz around him, nothing equivalent to world wide yellow bracelets.. Not even close..
I would love to see name numbers.. LeMond, Fonderiest, Cippiollini, Broadman, Colnago..bet nobody comes close to selling as many bikes as Armstrong did with Trek..I am in a fairly intense cycling area of the US and Colnago is still difficult to buy..Trek still coming off Lance effect.
Pogacar is a fraction of cultural and economic impact of Armstrong.
Something to keep in mind, Pogačar is not a commercial tool to make the (main) sponsors money. His purpose is to sportswash the United Arab Emirates. Colnago, likewise, serves its main purpose as a tool in this sportswashing endeavor. They aren't even bothering to make the Y1RS at any decent volume, even though it would fly off the shelves. The UAE team has probably still received more Y1RS frames than the rest of the world combined.Tadej still doesn't make as much money as Armstrong..
And there is very little buzz around him, nothing equivalent to world wide yellow bracelets.. Not even close..
I would love to see name numbers.. LeMond, Fonderiest, Cippiollini, Broadman, Colnago..bet nobody comes close to selling as many bikes as Armstrong did with Trek..I am in a fairly intense cycling area of the US and Colnago is still difficult to buy..Trek still coming off Lance effect.
Pogacar is a fraction of cultural and economic impact of Armstrong.
In your opinion.in europe pog is more popular tahn lance,but in usa offcourse lance was force.numbers are clear,pantani,induarin or ullrich were even on more juice than lance.and thye looked hilarius on climbs.riis showed that chump can become world beater in 90s,i would argue for big mig or ullrich the same.if we look at results of amateur,its clear pog is doing least amount of juice to psuh these numbers.you cant compare shape pog is in to anyone in 90s.
I don't think so, here Lance was known with many non cycling enthousiasts. Pogacar is not.in europe pog is more popular tahn lance,but in usa offcourse lance was force.numbers are clear,pantani,induarin or ullrich were even on more juice than lance.and thye looked hilarius on climbs.riis showed that chump can become world beater in 90s,i would argue for big mig or ullrich the same.if we look at results of amateur,its clear pog is doing least amount of juice to psuh these numbers.you cant compare shape pog is in to anyone in 90s.