- Apr 28, 2025
- 149
- 356
- 1,530
*** that give me Sky back. They were boring like 1 GT and the Dauphine per year and the rest they sometimes lost, sometimes did something funny, and in classics they were usually just nowhere.
Brailsford pushed boundaries, maybe to breaking point on the odd occasion. What he didn’t do is look at those boundaries, laugh, rip them up, and then waltz across them by a distance of about a million miles. All the while grinning into the camera like the cat who got the cream because he’s knows he’s untouchable.thank you Red Rick. it took years. I am getting vindicated, year by year, and many agree with you. those who don't want to, are just haters with Sir Dave living rent free in their heads
I’ve done that quite a bit.You could do that and then delete it after 5 minutes or so, just to get it out of your system.
I've been saying it for years but people think I'm trolling.thank you Red Rick. it took years. I am getting vindicated, year by year, and many agree with you. those who don't want to, are just haters with Sir Dave living rent free in their heads
thank you Red Rick. it took years. I am getting vindicated, year by year, and many agree with you. those who don't want to, are just haters with Sir Dave living rent free in their heads
Much of that was in group draft, and Pogacar slowed down in the necessary places because he had plenty of time on top of the Poggio and could then rest up for the sprint.What can you say about van aert then? He must have ridden a faster race from the place of the to the finish the the Pog,
No, I think once he caught the peloton he settled in and only launched right at the end. Merely smart riding from a guy who is maybe coming into form.What can you say about van aert then? He must have ridden a faster race from the place of the to the finish the the Pog,
Maybe he had an easier ride , but I still think he had a better time from the place of the crash he got up after Pogacar and had to change bike. He obviously beat MvdP if the race had been 500 m longer he would have won.No, I think once he caught the peloton he settled in and only launched right at the end. Merely smart riding from a guy who is maybe coming into form.
This is not true, there has been a lot of questions about his performance in Paris Roubaix and also he loses unnaturally seldom.Very curious pattern whenever Pogacar wins this thread blows up and when he loses this thread is as quiet as a library despite Pogacar pushing the same ''doping'' numbers you all claim. Paris-Roubaix 2025.
He crashed in Roubaix.Very curious pattern whenever Pogacar wins this thread blows up and when he loses this thread is as quiet as a library despite Pogacar pushing the same ''doping'' numbers you all claim. Paris-Roubaix 2025.
If MvdP starts winning nearly every Grand Tour, 1-week race, mountain stage and average 5 stage wins in Grand Tours, we'll make sure his clinic blows up as well.Very curious pattern whenever Pogacar wins this thread blows up and when he loses this thread is as quiet as a library despite Pogacar pushing the same ''doping'' numbers you all claim. Paris-Roubaix 2025.
And also there are numerous riders today that would win any races on one leg if you teleport them back to 2015. The entire peloton is becoming freakier each year and Pogacar happens to be the most freakiest one of allVery curious pattern whenever Pogacar wins this thread blows up and when he loses this thread is as quiet as a library despite Pogacar pushing the same ''doping'' numbers you all claim. Paris-Roubaix 2025.
Irrelevant. The point is the ''doping'' watts he produces only becomes an issue with people when Pogacar wins and not when he loses which leads to believe that this is anti-Pogacar related rather anti-doping. This is how I see it, similar pattern.He crashed in Roubaix.
These "it's just because he's winning" arguments are always more like confessions rather than solid arguments.Irrelevant. The point is the ''doping'' watts he produces only becomes an issue with people when Pogacar wins and not when he loses which leads to believe that this is anti-Pogacar related rather anti-doping.
I have never seen you talk about his watts whenever he loses. I appreciate you proving me right.These "it's just because he's winning" arguments are always more like confessions rather than solid arguments.
