I think Pantani, who was my idol as for a lot of people, was a big doper, he increase a lot with EPo his performance, more than others, he got controls at 41,5 and at 56 in just two months. But anyway he was more than a doper.
It was fair that Tour for him? I dont think so. Considering dopers and the few no dopers, maybe someone deserves more than him.
But all that has no sense. He won that Tour, in that era, with that controls, and we could choose put without winner all that Tours, or let him go putting an asterisk in all that Tours with the evidence of most people doped, and doped with Epo and transfusions, among other things, not a soft doping