theovaf said:He needed someone to pull him through the flat section betweent the 1st and 2nd climb. ideally someone who would drop from the breakaway group. unfortunatelly he's on his own
It's the karma I mentioned earlier.
theovaf said:He needed someone to pull him through the flat section betweent the 1st and 2nd climb. ideally someone who would drop from the breakaway group. unfortunatelly he's on his own
Publicus said:Basically the same squad sans Cuddles.
kurtinsc said:I don't agree.
I think single rider dominance is not good for the Tour. The years where Indurain and Lance dominated were good for fans of those riders... but winning constantly by 4-5 minute gaps doesn't make the races particularly interesting. It feels like we're getting another stretch with Contador doing that... it would be better if Andy really could outclimb him and have a lead without the TT's... that would add a lot of suspense.
When the best TT rider is equal to the best climber in the mountains... then the tour can lack some suspense. Pantani vs Ulrich or Lemond vs Fignon years are the most enjoyable... even Sastre vs Evans.
Big GMaC said:Bala, could perhaps explain Chasse Patate a bit more? That link wasn't helpful![]()
Publicus said:It's the karma I mentioned earlier.
kurtinsc said:I don't agree.
I think single rider dominance is not good for the Tour. The years where Indurain and Lance dominated were good for fans of those riders... but winning constantly by 4-5 minute gaps doesn't make the races particularly interesting. It feels like we're getting another stretch with Contador doing that... it would be better if Andy really could outclimb him and have a lead without the TT's... that would add a lot of suspense.
When the best TT rider is equal to the best climber in the mountains... then the tour can lack some suspense. Pantani vs Ulrich or Lemond vs Fignon years are the most enjoyable... even Sastre vs Evans.
ericthesportsman6 said:I don't think Cuddles had Moreno, and If so, that makes a huge difference.
rather the opposite...indurain666 said:So are you saying that a guy like Luis Ocana was as good as Francesco Moser against the clock?
And applying your same logic, you are saying that AC is better than AS against the clock cause AC has an aerodynamic bike and AS is riding a 10 speed steel huffy?
![]()
Ferminal said:Anyone going to split it up over the Soulor?![]()
Ferminal said:Anyone going to split it up over the Soulor?![]()
sometriguy said:I think saxo has to... They don't need to break the field, but they need to reduce it to 20-40 guys
superconfex said:but he did have VDB2 and i don't remember showing this form
kurtinsc said:Why didn't the Cervelo rider in the break wait for Sastre to help him through the valley section of the stage? Wouldn't that have made more sense if the goal was getting Sastre the stage?
kurtinsc said:Why didn't the Cervelo rider in the break wait for Sastre to help him through the valley section of the stage? Wouldn't that have made more sense if the goal was getting Sastre the stage?
kurtinsc said:Why didn't the Cervelo rider in the break wait for Sastre to help him through the valley section of the stage? Wouldn't that have made more sense if the goal was getting Sastre the stage?
Bala Verde said:ps anyone seen/played this cycling boardgame before? Chasse patat
sometriguy said:that does create a bit of a quandary
Ramira said:I think it generally refers to cyclist at the track who're stuck about half a lap in front of the group without getting anywhere basically being stuck somewhere in front of the group without having any chance of staying away. But I reckon it's a bit more complex then that. But the essence is pretty much he's stuck in front of the peleton and not going anywhere.
kurtinsc said:Why didn't the Cervelo rider in the break wait for Sastre to help him through the valley section of the stage? Wouldn't that have made more sense if the goal was getting Sastre the stage?
ericthesportsman6 said:I don't think Cuddles had Moreno, and If so, that makes a huge difference.