Team Ineos Discussion thread

Page 56 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Sep 12, 2016
441
0
0
I wonder what Ian Stannard and Adam Blythe are constantly talking about. They've finished side-by-side on all mountaineous stages so far haha :lol:
 
Re:

wouterkaas said:
I wonder what Ian Stannard and Adam Blythe are constantly talking about. They've finished side-by-side on all mountaineous stages so far haha :lol:
:surprised: Wow, that is really consistent. Every day except the TTT obviously and the two sprints in which Blythe took part. :D
 
Aug 22, 2017
41
0
0
Re: Team Sky Discussion thread

Now that Van Poppel has signed elsewhere at what point do we hear of Sky signing more replacements. Perhaps they might continue looking to the future in Christopher Lawless and Neilson Powless? Since I am fairly new to this sport, of those still on the market, at whom should Sky be looking to complete their roster? Thanks for your input.
 
What pure sprinter would wish to sign for Sky - Ultimately a high level sprinter wants to ride a GT and there are no guarantees at Sky - They had the perfect sprinter in Viviani for their set up and they stuffed it up.
 
I do wonder what the hell Poels is doing though. He is never involved with any of the pacing. Drops before Moscon/Nieve are done, and then finishes as 2nd Sky man. It's like he is riding his own Vuelta completely apart from the team. But what does it bring Sky/Poels? He's 12th 5 minutes behind, not even a viable plan B.

Poels should either get in the train or stop trying to hang on after he drops
 
Nov 29, 2010
2,326
0
0
That de la cruz signing looking a pretty sweet deal right now. 4th on GC. It's almost impossible to replace Nieve/Landa but they might've done it.

Plus Moscon is replacing Kwiatk and Thomas except for the small fact that those two are not leaving. :lol:
 
Re:

Dekker_Tifosi said:
I do wonder what the hell Poels is doing though. He is never involved with any of the pacing. Drops before Moscon/Nieve are done, and then finishes as 2nd Sky man. It's like he is riding his own Vuelta completely apart from the team. But what does it bring Sky/Poels? He's 12th 5 minutes behind, not even a viable plan B.

Poels should either get in the train or stop trying to hang on after he drops
This is exactly what Landa did at the Tour. Drop before he has to work in the earlier stages and then really come into his own during the latter stages, which I assume he will, since he's been Froome's last man in the third week of the Tour several times now.
 
Re: Team Sky Discussion thread

Wout is the same height as the Top Dawg, so if he
stays close once he's dropped he could still give up
his bike to Froomey without a massive loss of time, or
requiring Chris to make a 2nd change before the finish.
Plus Moscon/Nieve can both still help Chris get back on.
 
Re: Team Sky Discussion thread

It is going to be very interesting for fans
as well as the Team SKY management to
watch how new signing David de la Cruz
rides over the last week+ of the Vuelta.

He's currently in fourth only three seconds
off the podium but only one second ahead
of Kelderman in fifth and only two seconds
ahead of Zakarin in sixth.
 
Genuine question: how do you become a fan of a whole team? What makes a team like sky so popular? They don't race GTs particularly excitingly at all, they're owned by a class a ***, managed by a class b ***, and they are the most by far the richest and most dominant team. Their classics set up is fun and enjoyable, but sky fans seem to care a lot less about those. Same goes for other teams as well. A cycling team is unlike a football team or other as they aren't from a set place and their identity and often their name changes completely every few years. I guess personal connections help, but surely it is more reasonable to like single riders. Is it just because a certain team just has a collection of your favoured riders? Or is it a nationality thing? Honest query
 
Nov 29, 2010
2,326
0
0
Re:

Brullnux said:
Genuine question: how do you become a fan of a whole team? What makes a team like sky so popular? They don't race GTs particularly excitingly at all, they're owned by a class a *, managed by a class b *, and they are the most by far the richest and most dominant team. Their classics set up is fun and enjoyable, but sky fans seem to care a lot less about those. Same goes for other teams as well. A cycling team is unlike a football team or other as they aren't from a set place and their identity and often their name changes completely every few years. I guess personal connections help, but surely it is more reasonable to like single riders. Is it just because a certain team just has a collection of your favoured riders? Or is it a nationality thing? Honest query

I don't think anyone is a huge fan of any team since it's an individual sport but I think the connection comes from initially liking single riders. It then extends out a little when you get to know a few of the other riders a bit more if they're helping out a favourite rider.

I wasn't a fan of Sky until the 2011 Vuelta. :lol: Actually even then I wasn't a fan since they screwed over Froome but once Wiggins left and Thomas came to the fore who's also quite likeable it's a fun team as overpowered as they are.
 
Re:

Brullnux said:
Genuine question: how do you become a fan of a whole team? What makes a team like sky so popular? They don't race GTs particularly excitingly at all, they're owned by a class a *, managed by a class b *, and they are the most by far the richest and most dominant team. Their classics set up is fun and enjoyable, but sky fans seem to care a lot less about those. Same goes for other teams as well. A cycling team is unlike a football team or other as they aren't from a set place and their identity and often their name changes completely every few years. I guess personal connections help, but surely it is more reasonable to like single riders. Is it just because a certain team just has a collection of your favoured riders? Or is it a nationality thing? Honest query

I enjoy their dominant performances. They are actually good at tactics which boils the blood of forum trolls. I love every second of it.
 
Re: Re:

myrideissteelerthanyours said:
Brullnux said:
Genuine question: how do you become a fan of a whole team? What makes a team like sky so popular? They don't race GTs particularly excitingly at all, they're owned by a class a *, managed by a class b *, and they are the most by far the richest and most dominant team. Their classics set up is fun and enjoyable, but sky fans seem to care a lot less about those. Same goes for other teams as well. A cycling team is unlike a football team or other as they aren't from a set place and their identity and often their name changes completely every few years. I guess personal connections help, but surely it is more reasonable to like single riders. Is it just because a certain team just has a collection of your favoured riders? Or is it a nationality thing? Honest query

I enjoy their dominant performances. They are actually good at tactics which boils the blood of forum trolls. I love every second of it.

not sure about tactits, they had a few problems. but sticking to a plan and getting it done is what they do.
and the blood boiling is what I like more when Sky wins ;)