- Oct 15, 2012
Sorry, SOL? What's that got to do with anything? You seem to be mixing up whether there is a positive test (Yes) with whether his ghost should now face charges on the foot of that (clearly No)Fearless Greg Lemond said:All SOL martinvickers, you are welcome. Lets keep to the facts is your narrative or not?
But nobody's charging Pantani, or trying to.
You asked for the positives, rather disingenuously. You got them.
He had one suspension while alive, and three positive tests posthumously.
It can therefore be safely said, he was a doper. It's not conjecture or conspiracy theory whackiness.
For the record, we have positives and confessions from Fignon, and clear physical evidence of doping from Simpson.
If you can't see the difference, it's because you don't want to. Or pretending not to.