Wallace and Gromit said:
It will certainly be interesting to see how the event evolves. The "sprinter start" tactic may emerge as an attempt to force the opposition to blow up trying to keep pace or leave themselves too much to do to catch up after misjudging a steadier start. I have my doubts that anyone will be able to take on the majority of work in the first 1.5k, simply because the average lap time once up and running for a low 3:50s is 14s, and there's very few kilo riders can manage that once up and running. (An 18s first lap in a kilo plus 3 * 14s laps would be a minute dead, which is faster than anyone's managed at sea level.)
The relatively even load-sharing does intuitively seem the energy efficient way to go. I'm sure squads will be trying something different in training just to see, though. Nothing ventured; nothing gained. Otherwise, either the Brits or the Aussies will steamroller everyone trying "business as usual" in Rio.
I dont mean
all the work for the first 1.8-2.5 km, just double the laps. And to kick off with a further distance while the second place guy, who was a previous starter, like Clancy, pulls in behind the slipstream. And a guy who did that, could never do double turns form more than 1.8 to 2.5 k,
2 km, 8 laps of 250metre velodrome. 4 riders, one pulling double laps, others doing single turns. See I dont see how even a guy like Hoy could ride another 750 metres behind 3 riders pulling only one lap, and recover in the slipstream to do another turn before retiring. I am waaay tooo hypothetical. I remember at a Worlds, about 98, that Brett Lancaster pulled a double lap in the back end of a final, to put the Australians over the top of their competitors, probably Germany or Russia in 98.
Who was the coach of Wiggins in his first spell at GB cycling, the one Cav "potted" in his book, who said his ergo numbers and testing could not make him a pro on the road. I think he said about Clancy, his numbers in the pursuit were exactly the same as Wiggins.
And I thought G was even better and the true engine of the TP.
W&G what we have not speculated about, in this dialogue, on a 250 metre track, say you can pull back 15 metres on your start, and one less change of rolling up the banking, = ~18 metres, you will be about ~105 metres behind the other TP train. Will the wind be cleaner or whatever the technical term is for the CdA. And that was assuming a professional competing opposite, a less professional and quality opposition, you could get well under 100 metres difference and the air CdA would start to have a material affect.