is that re Knaven?MatParker117 said:DB:
“Unfortunately there was nothing concrete… that says to us this is undeniable”
“Whilst he maintains that position and without anything absolutely concrete to the contrary we have to take him at his word“
Franklin said:No worries, Knaven will either be thrown under the bus "New evidence forced us to part ways with our valued and esteemed colleague" or at the end of the year both parties will mutually decide that Knaven will be given "a chance to reorient himself and explore new career possibilities".
yeah, you're probably going to be right one way or the other.Franklin said:Interesting? Once again he's washing his hands in innocence. Then again, Knaven get's what he deserves.
Shameless selfquote:
Franklin said:No worries, Knaven will either be thrown under the bus "New evidence forced us to part ways with our valued and esteemed colleague" or at the end of the year both parties will mutually decide that Knaven will be given "a chance to reorient himself and explore new career possibilities".
sniper said:is that re Knaven?MatParker117 said:DB:
“Unfortunately there was nothing concrete… that says to us this is undeniable”
“Whilst he maintains that position and without anything absolutely concrete to the contrary we have to take him at his word“
If so, interesting choice of words.
would suggest they're close to dropping him.
alspacka said:sniper said:Uli Fluhme @ulif · Mar 12
caught myself swearing out loud while listening “@PaulKimmage: 40 min interview with Brailsford on CIRC.[...] Joke.
http://thecyclingpodcast.com/podcast/7- ... ing-report
Heard that interview. His messiah complex is getting more severe by the day I swear.
He also literally, verbatim, says they looked Knaven in the eyes. So it's fine. Move along now.
MatParker117 said:sniper said:is that re Knaven?MatParker117 said:DB:
“Unfortunately there was nothing concrete… that says to us this is undeniable”
“Whilst he maintains that position and without anything absolutely concrete to the contrary we have to take him at his word“
If so, interesting choice of words.
would suggest they're close to dropping him.
I think there hands are tied as legally they can't fire him without either a positive test or confession.
sniper said:yeah, you're probably going to be right one way or the other.Franklin said:Interesting? Once again he's washing his hands in innocence. Then again, Knaven get's what he deserves.
Shameless selfquote:
Franklin said:No worries, Knaven will either be thrown under the bus "New evidence forced us to part ways with our valued and esteemed colleague" or at the end of the year both parties will mutually decide that Knaven will be given "a chance to reorient himself and explore new career possibilities".
if we're lucky, Knaven will be blacklisted and not return to cycling.
interesting? well, Brailsford's choice for the word "unfortunately" struck me as, dunno, funny or something.
TheSpud said:No he doesn't - he says nothing of the sort.
TheSpud said:I didn't listen to the whole interview
alspacka said:TheSpud said:No he doesn't - he says nothing of the sort.
Yes, he does.
TheSpud said:I didn't listen to the whole interview
Oh.
If ZTP was a real thing they wouldn't have hired him in the first placeTheSpud said:I have to say though that DB has to sack Knaven based on ZTP, or declare ZTP dead.
this.Gung Ho Gun said:If ZTP was a real thing they wouldn't have hired him in the first placeTheSpud said:I have to say though that DB has to sack Knaven based on ZTP, or declare ZTP dead.
Same with Julich and others
who cares?JimmyFingers said:Who cares? The information about Knaven has been in the public domain for a few years, ZTP is a stupid policy, Brailsford can't fire someone if he is flat out denys it anyway. There's something called employment law: you can't just tear up contracts on a rumour or speculation, which I know must come to many here as a surprise. Plus it's the Mail using it as a stick to beat Murdoch.
if you wanna keep apologizing for Sky, go ahead.JimmyFingers said:Hush now, stop seeing monsters under every bed. It was a piece of PR, something for the sponsors wary of putting their name in a dirty sport, an attempt to break from the past. Your hyperbole is wearisome, but it suits your agenda I suppose.
it's not a coincidence then that only you and Spud bring it up these days?JimmyFingers said:as laughable at the ZTP.
I'm more worried about all those clean Brits who will suffer from Sky's fall out.JimmyFingers said:And the agenda shines through, all to lay low 'the Empire's' sporting success. It is what this place it full of, lots of hopping on the spot and white noise thrown about due to whatever sporting allegiances you have. Some of the guff is laughable, as laughable at the ZTP.
Oh Jimmy, so much stupidity from you in one post is amazing. How do you manage to get it worng with every sentence?JimmyFingers said:Who cares? The information about Knaven has been in the public domain for a few years, ZTP is a stupid policy, Brailsford can't fire someone if he is flat out denys it anyway. There's something called employment law: you can't just tear up contracts on a rumour or speculation, which I know must come to many here as a surprise. Plus it's the Mail using it as a stick to beat Murdoch.