sniper said:
ok, so quality is not the issue.
main problem remains: it's his home university, whereas he promised "independent research" on henao's blood. If only to avoid the nasty taste of biased research he should have picked another institute.
This is calling into question the independence of the researchers, which is extremely unfair. Sky are not paying them, if they paid for anything it would have to be declared in any published work, and any publications would be scrutinised by the community. Evidence of foul play, covering up or falsifying results invariably comes out and then that's that researchers career done and dusted. This is even more likely in that many journals now require raw data to be made available upon publication. The implication that they are likely to do any of this, just because Brailsford happened to attend that university, is massively unfair.
To the general fan maybe it would have been better to go somewhere else, but it's perfectly possible, perhaps even probable, that Sheffield is the best place to do this research. Even if he went elsewhere you will invariably find ties to WADA, the UCI and British cycling somewhere. The best people get the work, it's the same in any research environment. I do get the point though.
Really, my main bone of contention was that the comment I replied to seemed to show a lack of knowledge about the research community in the UK and just be an uninformed dig.