The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
Wow, okay... Would it be any different if they were a Spanish or Belgian team?Stingray34 said:Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
What we're saying is we're sick of the likes of Sky leveraging the Puerto/Landis/Armstrong scandals by claiming they're snow white, Britishly beautiful and can never do wrong, all the while cynically exploiting the broader desire for trust and transparency while being just as dirty and connected and corrupt as their forebears, just because they speak English, think they're superior, and aren't part of that tainted 'foreigner' cheating business.
for me, the thought of - with all due respect - really dumb people like Messi and Ronaldo making so much money that the next 10 or 15 generations of their offspring will never have to work a single minute is unbearable.Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
Fair enough, I get that and see it myself. There's pro athletes in the US that make me sick every time I hear them speak. (for some reason journo's think that they'll get a well thought, articulate sound bite from a stammering idiot that has an enormously strong arm or legs...) But, the ruin of prosport just for the sake of destruction doesn't seem likely, although pro cycling could be ruined it will never go away for good. Too many people love to watch the likes of Contador, Sagan and the others throw a leg over a bicycle and ride faster than humans were ever though to be capable of.sniper said:for me, the thought of - with all possible respect - really dumb people like Messi and Ronaldo making so much money that the next 10 or 15 generations of their offspring will never have to work a single minute is unbearable.Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
Guys like Sutton and Wiggins same story of course.
Not that I don't wish them good fortune, but we're talking about really dumb people here who otherwise would be happy to stack shelves in tesco, people also who do absolutely nothing useful with their immense wealth except driving expensive cars, buying small islands and 'growing' their fortune by evading tax and creating fake charities.
For me, pro-sport as it is contributes absolutely nothing useful to the world, except turning it into a place where cheating is the norm.
Irondan said:Wow, okay... Would it be any different if they were a Spanish or Belgian team?Stingray34 said:Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
What we're saying is we're sick of the likes of Sky leveraging the Puerto/Landis/Armstrong scandals by claiming they're snow white, Britishly beautiful and can never do wrong, all the while cynically exploiting the broader desire for trust and transparency while being just as dirty and connected and corrupt as their forebears, just because they speak English, think they're superior, and aren't part of that tainted 'foreigner' cheating business.
Irondan said:Wow, okay... Would it be any different if they were a Spanish or Belgian team?Stingray34 said:Irondan said:What are you insinuating, that pro cycling burn to the ground with the hope that it will rise again as the clean sport everyone hopes it would be? I guess I'm jaded in the fact that all top prosport is tainted, and always will be as long as there's big money, power, prestige, etc. to be had. Frankly I don't think a cleansing would help..sniper said:Yeah, let it fold. I don't see any donwsides.
I mean in its current form, why would anyone want PRO-cycling to continue existing?
Honest question.
I can't think of too many arguments.
Sure, the entertainment.
But does the entertainment value weigh up against the knowledge that all these bottomfeeders are making huge (taxpayer) money by cheating? Not for me.
What we're saying is we're sick of the likes of Sky leveraging the Puerto/Landis/Armstrong scandals by claiming they're snow white, Britishly beautiful and can never do wrong, all the while cynically exploiting the broader desire for trust and transparency while being just as dirty and connected and corrupt as their forebears, just because they speak English, think they're superior, and aren't part of that tainted 'foreigner' cheating business.
sniper said:excellent point stingray.
whether we like it or not, i think it's difficult to ignore that there is a pro-anglophone bias at play in the background.
And that's relatively easy to explain from a commercial perspective.
sniper said:excellent point stingray.
whether we like it or not, i think it's difficult to ignore that there is a pro-anglophone bias at play in the background.
And that's relatively easy to explain from a commercial perspective.
They ask some good questions....Robert5091 said:http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Even the normal cheerleading BBC are asking some questions about "Jiffygate" (tm)
- But questions remain:
- Why has it taken so long for organisations that claim to be committed to transparency and accountability to get here?
- The Daily Mail now reports that Brailsford tried to persuade them not to run the Jiffy bag story. Why go to such efforts when it merely contained a decongestant?
- Will British Cycling or Team Sky now be able to provide a paper trail to back up the Fluimucil explanation?
- Why was British Cycling president Bob Howden still unable to say what was in the jiffy bag months after the story broke, only for Brailsford to then reveal it?
- Why were Brailsford's original explanations about the delivery not correct when all he had to do was ask former team medic Dr Richard Freeman?
- Why send for a routine, innocuous drug from over 1,000 kilometres away when it could have been easily sourced in France?
- Why did former coach Shane Sutton "authorise" the delivery of something, the details of which he claims not to be aware of? And why did Wiggins' long-term mentor not know what medication his star cyclist was taking?
- And why was Wiggins taking a decongestant that apparently is not meant to be used by asthmatics (like him)?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Irondan said:They ask some good questions....Robert5091 said:http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Even the normal cheerleading BBC are asking some questions about "Jiffygate" (tm)
- But questions remain:
- Why has it taken so long for organisations that claim to be committed to transparency and accountability to get here?
- The Daily Mail now reports that Brailsford tried to persuade them not to run the Jiffy bag story. Why go to such efforts when it merely contained a decongestant?
- Will British Cycling or Team Sky now be able to provide a paper trail to back up the Fluimucil explanation?
- Why was British Cycling president Bob Howden still unable to say what was in the jiffy bag months after the story broke, only for Brailsford to then reveal it?
- Why were Brailsford's original explanations about the delivery not correct when all he had to do was ask former team medic Dr Richard Freeman?
- Why send for a routine, innocuous drug from over 1,000 kilometres away when it could have been easily sourced in France?
- Why did former coach Shane Sutton "authorise" the delivery of something, the details of which he claims not to be aware of? And why did Wiggins' long-term mentor not know what medication his star cyclist was taking?
- And why was Wiggins taking a decongestant that apparently is not meant to be used by asthmatics (like him)?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
red_flanders said:Irondan said:They ask some good questions....Robert5091 said:http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Even the normal cheerleading BBC are asking some questions about "Jiffygate" (tm)
- But questions remain:
- Why has it taken so long for organisations that claim to be committed to transparency and accountability to get here?
- The Daily Mail now reports that Brailsford tried to persuade them not to run the Jiffy bag story. Why go to such efforts when it merely contained a decongestant?
- Will British Cycling or Team Sky now be able to provide a paper trail to back up the Fluimucil explanation?
- Why was British Cycling president Bob Howden still unable to say what was in the jiffy bag months after the story broke, only for Brailsford to then reveal it?
- Why were Brailsford's original explanations about the delivery not correct when all he had to do was ask former team medic Dr Richard Freeman?
- Why send for a routine, innocuous drug from over 1,000 kilometres away when it could have been easily sourced in France?
- Why did former coach Shane Sutton "authorise" the delivery of something, the details of which he claims not to be aware of? And why did Wiggins' long-term mentor not know what medication his star cyclist was taking?
- And why was Wiggins taking a decongestant that apparently is not meant to be used by asthmatics (like him)?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Great questions.
I wonder...what the most likely answer is here...something obvious maybe? Nah.
I guess it was just handled badly. That should cover it.
Electress said:red_flanders said:Irondan said:They ask some good questions....Robert5091 said:http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Even the normal cheerleading BBC are asking some questions about "Jiffygate" (tm)
- But questions remain:
- Why has it taken so long for organisations that claim to be committed to transparency and accountability to get here?
- The Daily Mail now reports that Brailsford tried to persuade them not to run the Jiffy bag story. Why go to such efforts when it merely contained a decongestant?
- Will British Cycling or Team Sky now be able to provide a paper trail to back up the Fluimucil explanation?
- Why was British Cycling president Bob Howden still unable to say what was in the jiffy bag months after the story broke, only for Brailsford to then reveal it?
- Why were Brailsford's original explanations about the delivery not correct when all he had to do was ask former team medic Dr Richard Freeman?
- Why send for a routine, innocuous drug from over 1,000 kilometres away when it could have been easily sourced in France?
- Why did former coach Shane Sutton "authorise" the delivery of something, the details of which he claims not to be aware of? And why did Wiggins' long-term mentor not know what medication his star cyclist was taking?
- And why was Wiggins taking a decongestant that apparently is not meant to be used by asthmatics (like him)?
http://www.bbc.com/sport/cycling/38379953
Great questions.
I wonder...what the most likely answer is here...something obvious maybe? Nah.
I guess it was just handled badly. That should cover it.
Seems to me that Sky have spent the time going through Wiggo's records to find something that they could say was in the bag that wouldn't raise alarm bells. Couldn't go saying it was something out of the blue without begging further questions. So Flumacil will all tally with official records even if the whole story is absurd.
He may not be an official "Grand Master" but his rating suggests he's not far behind being one.kingjr said:Klitschko a chess GM? You sure about that? ...
I think that was his father.Irondan said:was also one of the commanders in charge of cleaning up the effects of the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and was afterward diagnosed with cancer.kingjr said:Klitschko a chess GM? You sure about that? ...
Right, I edited my comment to reflect that.kingjr said:I think that was his father.Irondan said:was also one of the commanders in charge of cleaning up the effects of the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and was afterward diagnosed with cancer.kingjr said:Klitschko a chess GM? You sure about that? ...