Re: Re:
Thanks.
I was just kidding really, though pointing out that it is circumstantial so far.
But yes, as you say, the history is relevant and telling, and it certainly looks like Sky have been doping - it would be hard to conclude otherwise IMO. Will they go down for it though? It doesn't look likely so far. Some kind of slamdunk evidence is needed, or a confession, or something of that nature...the present circumstantial evidence isn't enough.
Edited: Nonsense deleted.
Benotti69 said:Dan2016 said:Benotti69 said:yaco said:I wonder if this leak is trying to make UKAD overspend their budget - Seems to be lots of leaks which raise the interest of UKAD, but at the same time little hard evidence.
Plenty of hard evidence.
Hired 4 doping doctors.
Needle use. IV use. Kenacort.
Countless lies.
Soon be enough for Walsh to write a book...........
That's circumstancialistical evidence in't it.
The whole thing doesn't pass that test when you smell things, or that one about balancing stuff...but there's no evidence of like totally hard things yet.
You know Wiggins does not have asthma or pollen allergies. That a big rich team can get doctors to sign prescriptions and certs saying he does dont make it so.
Try and remember we are talking professional cycling. Try and read up on a little history of the sport and you will see Wiggins another rider with buckets of talent who needed dope to win big races. Just like the rest of the GT winners.
You're welcome.
Thanks.
I was just kidding really, though pointing out that it is circumstantial so far.
But yes, as you say, the history is relevant and telling, and it certainly looks like Sky have been doping - it would be hard to conclude otherwise IMO. Will they go down for it though? It doesn't look likely so far. Some kind of slamdunk evidence is needed, or a confession, or something of that nature...the present circumstantial evidence isn't enough.
Edited: Nonsense deleted.