Dear Wiggo said:
Are you saying Wiggins didn't mention anything about a couch? Man you are all kinds of uppity today.
Hey its a Monday, I'm always uppity. But what I do dislike here is pictures of Wiggins at an award ceremony, or him having a cigarette on holiday, or discussions of the coat he wears at the TdF presentation, or an interview about how he felt after the 2004 Olympic games. There is always a desire to highlight these things in these threads and analyse and dissect, and usually draw the darkest possible conclusions, and point and laugh and mock.
But I fail to see anything relevant to the subject of doping.
This is what I mean by character assassination: throwing enough mud at someone you dislike to deride and devalue their success. The prejudice shines through: people really don't like Bradley Wiggins much outside of Britain, and especially here given it's tribalism, so you look for ways to blacken his name, and doping simply becomes one of those means.
DW if you were racing your bike professionally, you would expect discussions on the validity of your performances on the bike, would you expect all the people calling you names, laughing, mocking, sneering at paparazzi shots and interviews, the abuse you would get on twitter? You might say it comes with the territory but it doesn't make it right.
I understand there are question marks about Sky's and Wiggins' performance, but lets keep it to those, not their personalities. Plenty of nice guys doped.