- Aug 12, 2009
- 3,639
- 0
- 0
thehog said:This I agree with.
You're unlikely to see the doping on camera.
Who was the rider?
Why'd they pick some random and not a big name to give us a peek at?
thehog said:This I agree with.
You're unlikely to see the doping on camera.
Galic Ho said:They ask what car I drive? Useless survey. They don't even have Holden which a sizable portion of Aussies drive. Don't even have parent company GM down. Great survery dude. Great survey!![]()
JimmyFingers said:Obviously not too worried about their penetration into the Australian market.
richtea said:This has to be the poorest survey design and execution I have ever seen. The sampling methodology will lead to so much self selection bias that the results will be fundamentally meaningless, and then on top of that they cant be bothered to do some basic quality checks on the script. How embarrassingly poor, should have paid a bit more to get the pros in instead of these Repucom chancers.
maltiv said:Well, now we can safely conclude that the theories about Nordhaug sucking because he left Sky were wrong. Today he was just as strong as he was last year, even with all the problems he's had in the build up.
xcleigh said:So basically what we're saying is this is yet another example of how utterly incompetent Team SKY are, and yet they apparently run an extremely efficient doping program? Not sure what a survey has to do with doping? Did USPostal do one and SKY are mindlessly following their example as they supposedly are with everything else?
richtea said:This has nothing to do with Sky, I wouldn't expect a cycling team to know how to run a survey. But the company they have hired clearly haven't a clue.
mrthomasmolar said:So what do think about sky???
ebandit said:pretty blue......................completely AWOL at amstel
again for the team with the most sophisticated programme....they sucked
and i don't think comparison with USPS classics performances is relavant
team sky are not just gunning for the tour
Mark L
ebandit said:pretty blue......................completely AWOL at amstel
again for the team with the most sophisticated programme....they sucked
and i don't think comparison with USPS classics performances is relavant
team sky are not just gunning for the tour
Mark L
ChewbaccaD said:You're right, they are gunning for every single GT and week-long stage race...that makes it much more egregious than USPS...
Libertine Seguros said:Biopassport means they pretty much have to. Otherwise they probably would just go Tour and Worlds only, in accordance with what the general public in Britain knew of cycling before the wheel was reinvented. If you're going all out for the Tour, you've got to be posting similar values all year round, doped or clean, otherwise the values stand out like a sore thumb and you get a high score in the suspicion index.
(note to British posters: this is for what the layman is aware of, not what British cycling fans are aware of)
ebandit said:pretty blue......................completely AWOL at amstel
again for the team with the most sophisticated programme....they sucked
and i don't think comparison with USPS classics performances is relevant
team sky are not just gunning for the tour
Mark L
Sky's classic season was seriously bad. I don't understand how marginal gains only applies to five guys from a team of 20 plus.
Why not? Does it matter which teams he has ridden for?Ferminal said:I respect Pinotti for his personal choices but he has no right suggesting that others are doping, given the teams he has ridden for. That said I don't think he has implied as much.
Ferminal said:I respect Pinotti for his personal choices but he has no right suggesting that others are doping, given the teams he has ridden for. That said I don't think he has implied as much.
JRanton said:Marco Pinotti favoured this tweet from Digger_forum (posts on here occasionally I think) on twitter.
Pretty interesting I thought. Evans has made some subtle comments about Sky too.
Pretty clear that BMC think (or at least highly suspect) that Sky's GC Tenerife gang were doping last year.
JRanton said:What do you think he's implying by favouring that tweet?
Netserk said:Why not? Does it matter which teams he has ridden for?
BroDeal said:Several pros and managers have intimated that Sky is doping. I think that is some of the most daming evidence against Sky. Riding next to people for several years will give you a good feel for what their capabilities are. You will know something is up when the those capabilities dramatically change.
