samerics said:
Learning how to climb in the middle of a career to become a Grand Tour champion is plenty of smoke.
Learning how to TT in the middle of a career and destroying fields is plenty of smoke.
2012's results having no historic precedence are plenty of smoke.
Finishing very, very close to a known-doped, protected by the UCI, podium at a grand tour makes smoke.
Lienders makes plenty of smoke.
Froome's zero-to-hero performances make plenty of smoke.
Weight loss and power combined like never seen before, over at least 3 weeks.
It's getting pretty smokey. Should I go on?
samerics said:
the covered up positives,
How would we know? The bio-passport is now under total control of the sports federation. They don't have to process positives if they don't want to.
samerics said:
the rumours from ex team mates etc? You make it sound like they're Armstrong and co! They are patently not.
That's true, they seem to be aware it's possible for a jilted team member to create doping controversy.