EnacheV said:
99% those 22k posts are trolling material, based on the mantra "if you say it many times it becomes true" combined with "if more people say it many times it becomes even more true"
You're a math phd yet you come up with this?
Most of the reason that there are 22k posts to begin with is that various incarnations of sky defenders such as yourself are in there with different variations, repeated ad nauseum, of "never tested positive" and "marginal gains" and "brits are clean".
someone like JimmyFingers almost puts your 99% figure to shame with the quantity of his postings alone.
The irony of some troll alone adding 30+ sky-defending posts in the handful of days since he has registered and then turning around and using the sheer number of posts as an attempted indictment of the forum's veracity is delicious.
But, primarily, the bs 99% generalization only demonstrates that you didn't read all of the posts. Which makes your arguments generalizing the content of said posts nothing but trollcraft.
As if the forum needed another example of your lack of substance, when you yourself admitted that you supported Armstrong until the reasoned decision.
This fact alone disqualifies you from being taken seriously.