Such a disappointing reaction from some riders. To a certain extent, I can understand those who commend LAs charity work, but even this was built on lies. "Look at me, I survived cancer and have gone on to be super-duper, you can too*". Interesting moral argument that one. But those stating "ohhh it was in the past, that was then". ****s sake, get a grip. Incredibly naive point of view and unhealthy for the recovery of the sport. His actions should be condemned. Anyway, what LA did extends a little beyond the casual EPO user. Make Richard Virenque look a saint, and a fanny for only lying for a matter of days! As far as I'm concerned the mans a bloody criminal. Enforcing the use of drugs as a pre-requisite of joining the team!?? .... Jesus wept.
But don't worry, every one was a bad penny back then Alex, hey? Fantastic, display of arrogance, naivety, ineptitude by British cycling on this matter yet again. I beg Wiggo to keep his fat gob shut 'n all. Not a fan of his one iota, but I bet he can't help but have one last slug on Lance's depleted nether regions.
The attitude of British cyclists actually sums up the opinions of the wider, ill-informed British public (not many cycling enthusiasts) quite well. We're a nations of suckers for heroes and facts in equal measure. Therefore a 7 times winner of the worlds toughest sports event (which we now hold, yey!

) who did so after surviving cancer and passed over 500 tests is a legend, no questions asked. Listening to radio shows (particulalrly talk sport - and even more so you Darren Gough) is a right hardship at the moment. Some ***, usually - but not limited to - a former sports star who had never even heard of cycling until the worlds first sprinter Mark Cavendish came along, starts trying to impose their over sized egotistical opinions onto a subject they not sod all about.
* You may require $millions of PEDs