Interesting article in the Daily Telegraph last night:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9605632/Sean-Yates-and-all-Team-Sky-employees-will-be-asked-to-confirm-they-have-not-breached-drug-free-policy.html
The gist seems to be that they had no idea about Barry or Leinders having a drug-related past, and that "anyone confessing to a doping past is likely to lose their job". Basically, Brailsford "is determined to make good on the commitment to not employ anyone with a doping past".
Now... I'm getting on a bit, so my memory isn't what it used to be... but, after the death of Txema Gonzalez, didn't Sky say they were dropping the 'zero tolerance' policy because they needed experienced people in certain roles, and you just couldn't find experienced people that weren't in some way connected to teams that had doped?
Also, leaving that aside, doesn't this article imply that Brailsford has no idea that Sean Yates failed a drug test?
The claim that "Team Sky have always conducted due diligence on their employees to defend their zero-tolerance position" obviously doesn't extend to using google.
(Because, if you type "sean ya" into google, "sean yates doping" is offered as a suggestion of what you might be looking for.)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/lancearmstrong/9605632/Sean-Yates-and-all-Team-Sky-employees-will-be-asked-to-confirm-they-have-not-breached-drug-free-policy.html
The gist seems to be that they had no idea about Barry or Leinders having a drug-related past, and that "anyone confessing to a doping past is likely to lose their job". Basically, Brailsford "is determined to make good on the commitment to not employ anyone with a doping past".
Now... I'm getting on a bit, so my memory isn't what it used to be... but, after the death of Txema Gonzalez, didn't Sky say they were dropping the 'zero tolerance' policy because they needed experienced people in certain roles, and you just couldn't find experienced people that weren't in some way connected to teams that had doped?
Also, leaving that aside, doesn't this article imply that Brailsford has no idea that Sean Yates failed a drug test?
The claim that "Team Sky have always conducted due diligence on their employees to defend their zero-tolerance position" obviously doesn't extend to using google.
(Because, if you type "sean ya" into google, "sean yates doping" is offered as a suggestion of what you might be looking for.)
