Not the exact words but the same sentimentJoachim said:Just to be clear, can you provide a link to where he uses those exact words, seeing as you've put them in quotation marks
http://x2t.com/198638
Not the exact words but the same sentimentJoachim said:Just to be clear, can you provide a link to where he uses those exact words, seeing as you've put them in quotation marks
Libertine Seguros said:Я часто сижу и грущу, я умею плакать без слез.....
zalacain said:Not the exact words but the same sentiment
http://x2t.com/198638
Joachim said:It's nothing like the same sentiment. With the greatest of respect you don't even need to read beyond the title of that piece you linked to:
"Dave Brailsford on why telling the truth is only part of the process"
How some of you can read 'the truth is not that important' or 'Brailsford wants nobody to talk' from this calls into question your ability to comprehend English. The key word is 'process'. He's saying telling the truth is not enough...there needs to be something done with it. That is the polar opposite to trying to stifle truth.
I mean, we are all used to Hoggie's wilful mendacity, we expect that from him, it's what he does to try and get attention, but the rest of you? Come on.
sublimit said:This is it, anybody else making that same statement by Brailsford would be ignored. I suppose Brailsford should be flattered that everything he says is analyzed to a ridiculous extent and then deliberately misinterpreted as per usual to suit the needs of the clinicians.
Grandillusion said:Sorry LS forgot to ask on the abysmal translation, who's the poet then?
Caruut said:Brailsford didn't say "I support T&R but we need to go further", what he effectively said was "Here's a version of T&R that doesn't go far enough. Since this version doesn't go far enough let's not do it.
Joachim said:It's nothing like the same sentiment. With the greatest of respect you don't even need to read beyond the title of that piece you linked to:
"Dave Brailsford on why telling the truth is only part of the process"
How some of you can read 'the truth is not that important' or 'Brailsford wants nobody to talk' from this calls into question your ability to comprehend English. The key word is 'process'. He's saying telling the truth is not enough...there needs to be something done with it. That is the polar opposite to trying to stifle truth.
I mean, we are all used to Hoggie's wilful mendacity, we expect that from him, it's what he does to try and get attention, but the rest of you? Come on.
D-Queued said:Not likely to be Kafka, but the nightmarishly surreal surely has some traction in explaining blood-doped professional sport.
Dave.
Joachim said:Sorry, where does he even intimate that the T&R process should not happen?
Joachim said:Sorry, where does he even intimate that the T&R process should not happen?
Franklin said:But I don't see the obstruction of T&R commision.
Caruut said:I think I perhaps overstated to begin with. Does it not strike you as odd how negative he is about it though?
Given the fact Brailsford was on the hotel room with Millar when he got EPO busted and believed Rob Hayles when he was crying like a baby when dear Rob phoned his wife [after his hematocrit positive] Brailsford should not be a benchmark for whether or not a T&R committee would or should work, in my book.Franklin said:I share his scepticism. Without a clear (rudimentary)plan what to do with the confessions and some stated goals it's likely to go to waste. Clean cycling is simply to big and vague a goal. We all want peace on earth.
Caruut said:I suppose it's just the tone of his comments - all negativity and no solution proposed. If he is who he says he is I think his reaction should be "This is the best thing for clean cycling since we invented the test for EPO. We can go further but this is great anyway". He doesn't say how he wants to go further, personally I think one of the only ways T&R does work is if you minimise consequences to allow the truth to come out. If you don't, then you're right back to square one with no-one saying anything. All he does is cast doubt on things. No positivity. Doesn't that worry you, if you want cleaner cycling?
Grandillusion said:The 'something that would be done with it' is outlined in black and white by the UCIIC's published statement on Friday's hearing. It would enable a detailed and forencic examination of the allegations made in USADA's RD, and this proposed process is supported by all the serious bodies with an interest in cleaning up the sport.
Brailsford is in effect saying he disagrees with going forward with this vitally necessary process. Anybody's guess as to why.
Fearless Greg Lemond said:Given the fact Brailsford was on the hotel room with Millar when he got EPO busted and believed Rob Hayles when he was crying like a baby when dear Rob phoned his wife [after his hematocrit positive] Brailsford should not be a benchmark for whether or not a T&R committee would or should work, in my book.
Caruut said:I suppose it's just the tone of his comments - all negativity and no solution proposed. If he is who he says he is I think his reaction should be "This is the best thing for clean cycling since we invented the test for EPO. We can go further but this is great anyway". He doesn't say how he wants to go further, personally I think one of the only ways T&R does work is if you minimise consequences to allow the truth to come out. If you don't, then you're right back to square one with no-one saying anything. All he does is cast doubt on things. No positivity. Doesn't that worry you, if you want cleaner cycling?
del1962 said:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/9828392/Team-Skys-Dave-Brailsford-angered-by-UCI-plan-to-offer-amnesty-to-doping-whistle-blowers.html#
If you read the article, what annoys Brailsford is that cyclist who doped will get off scott free.
del1962 said:http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/cycling/9828392/Team-Skys-Dave-Brailsford-angered-by-UCI-plan-to-offer-amnesty-to-doping-whistle-blowers.html#
If you read the article, what annoys Brailsford is that cyclist who doped will get off scott free.
Franklin said:I share his scepticism. Without a clear (rudimentary)plan what to do with the confessions and some stated goals it's likely to go to waste. Clean cycling is simply to big and vague a goal. We all want peace on earth.
