iZnoGouD said:you're all retards, everyone who dominates is a doper by your logic
Yea, I'm not sure what I'm going to do when skiing season's over.bobbins said:Here's a checklist for dominating cycling;
Big money sponsor that the UCI will want to look after
Get in bed with a tame national federation, even better if it is one that people think is clean. This should make OOC testing a bit less of a headache
Get the UCI in your pocket, invite its president to your launch, really look after him, I mean really look after him
Buy the press - nice weeks away with the team in majorca and at selected races, loads of freebies should do this.
Get David Walshe on the sponsors payroll
Get a believable reason that the gullible public and your new fans can swallow. Marginal gains, riders lucky duvets, having a chef, choosing your own wheels.
USPS only missed one or two off. They could have had it all.
It's only March and I can't bare to watch the cycling on TV, very sad.
iZnoGouD said:don't you all see that in the past everyone only cared about doping and because of that there is a big edge to be gained since pro cyclists compared to other pros don't know as much about training and what they are doing nor are they monitored as much by their teams as in other sports
Parrulo said:not surprising by some1 that still thinks armstrong is a clean legend. . . .
either way drop the insults or you will get a ban for that, i have warned you before via pm so consider this your last chance to learn some manners
Benotti69 said:So the new boys (sky)have arrived to teach the other, who are amateurs how to race with diet, warm downs and words of motivation on the bike frame?
I dont think so.
Sky are in bed with UCI.
the sceptic said:British people would never dope, theyre just all at the peak human physiology which means that its impossible to beat them unless you dope.
iZnoGouD said:I know how things work in RNT and from what i've seen from from interviews and documentaries from sky they are certainly on another level in the training
aspect.
thehog said:Have you seen interviews and documentaries of other teams to compare?
Why are they on another level?
brodeal said:armstrong takes another hit. He was hoping to hold on to the title for most sophisticated doping program in sport but it looks like there is new title holder that makes him look like a piker.
BroDeal said:Armstrong takes another hit. He was hoping to hold on to the title for most sophisticated doping program in sport but it looks like there is new title holder that makes him look like a piker.
Walkman said:Hold you horses. LA AND USPS was worse, far worse than SKY. Lets see how 2013 develop before making such claims. That is an prestigious title and LA won't let it go easy.![]()
airstream said:I can understand Benotti69, sniper, hrotha and other guys, who apparently are strongly against doping first of all and only then can support some riders (probably, sorry, I don't know for sure). But I see there many forumities who are simply insulted by the fact that Sky boys DARED to beat their favorites. And Sky train is only an explanation to justify this discontent. Grievance is a key word for me here. It is very odd.
But my question is directed on everyone: is it possible to be much stronger than all the rest technically and physically without doping??? I don't consider Sky much stronger than rest of the field, but still... They just have the best domestiques and very likely best captains or best performers, if you like.
What do you think?
ferryman said:I think you are once again surfing the edge of trolling and baiting. And the wave is about to give up on you pretty soon.
But my question is directed on everyone: is it possible to be much stronger than all the rest technically and physically without doping??? I don't consider Sky much stronger than rest of the field, but still... They just have the best domestiques and very likely best captains or best performers, if you like.
What do you think?
