- Jul 6, 2010
- 2,340
- 0
- 0
ianfra said:Actually your post was horribly offensive. There was an era of Armstrong et al where dope was indeed the oil in the engine Of tht there is no doubt.
However, we have moved into a new era and your post was a nasty cynical and unwarranted slur on an honourable person in the shape of Wiggins. Remember the pain he went through when the Cofidis team was dragged away by the police because one idiot doped? Do you really think that Sky and the British Cycling Team could get away with cheating when they are under so much scrutiny? Don't you think that given a scientific approach to training with new thinking and new ideas may just be the game changer here? Do you really think that continually insulting Brailsford and his team's collective intelligence and the hard work of a very talented and gifted rider is the way to proceed here? In fact do half you guys think at all before putting pen to paper or keys to computer?
For once in your life you collective non-achievers should open your eyes and praise the success of others and stop insulting those who have managed to get it together. Indeed if half of the cycling nations in the world took the no-nonsense approach taken by British Cycling and Sky, persuaded their governments to invest pubic money and so on, then you'd have greater success from many countries on the world stage. I can only look at the abysmal organisation of the Thai Cycling Association - a country that should be producing great climbers and rouleurs - to know just how much truth their is in my statement.
So instead of sitting there and writing putrid nonsense why don't you go out there and start organsing in the way that Brailsford and British Cycling has done? Or perhaps its easier just to sit there and write nonsense and showing disrespect to those this nonsense are loners with autism who do not understand the meaning of the words 'work' and 'success'. Wiggins referred to you lot as something beginning with "W:. He was being too kind.
Nothing like fighting against generalities with more generalities.
How's that working for ya?