thehog said:These are my two favorite Sky/Walsh books![]()
![]()
![]()
That Walsh one looks like it belongs on a twitter parody account. Nice work, Hog.
thehog said:These are my two favorite Sky/Walsh books![]()
![]()
![]()
JimmyFingers said:The Hitch said:I don't think anyone ever said anything of the sort.JimmyFingers said:No you're wrong, book releases are clear evidence of Sky's racketeering and protection rackets
BTW why are you so obsessed about this thread existing? Its no big deal, its just a thread.
Have you even read any of these books. If you had, and you'd seen some of the absolutely bats*** insane arguments Sky and their authors make in them, you might understand why we would want a seperate thread in which to host a discussion about them.
Particularly funny, from memory, are the claims that Froome trains 4 hours every night with his strava off so that his coaches don't find out and the piece de resistance, the portrayal of Rod Ellingworth as "anti doping"![]()
You equated them releasing books with criminal gangs inserting themselves into the upper echelons of society, so they become institutionalised and difficult to bring to justice. As I said, embarrassing. As for obsession, this is your thread, you posted it, so who is the one obsessed?
That's because Astanas actions are like an open book.jens_attacks said:and some ask why people like astana better...
how many book are out there about vino, shefer and zeits?
Maybe I'm misreading your point about Brian Smith (if we are talking about the Eurosport hack behind JTL) was a close friend of Armstrong and spend his time on Eurosport assuring everyone that Lance was clean and Landis and Hamilton just bitter.bobbins said:When there were no Brits winning the tour the 'journalists' had a lot of time on their hands and could get stuck in to the murky side of cycling. See how Richard Moore and Brian Smith were straight out to condemn Armstrong despite Smith in particular having made a living on being the guy who babysat young Lance and never saw anything dodgy. Now all the english speaking press are milking the Sky machine and need to keep on side to get access etc, no one is going to rock the boat.
UKADA would run a mile even if presented with a smoking gun WRT Sky doping. Sky would bankrupt them in court.
Another Hog specialDear Wiggo said:el oh el at that Milking It novel. Is it on Amazon yet?
Not to rehash some of what was said on a recently locked thread but there are books about Vino in Kazakh. He's a freaking national hero there. Loved this apparent mistranslation in particular "the Olympic champion will be opened in the name of so-called public funds".jens_attacks said:and some ask why people like astana better...
how many book are out there about vino, shefer and zeits?
wendybnt said:JimmyFingers said:The Hitch said:I don't think anyone ever said anything of the sort.JimmyFingers said:No you're wrong, book releases are clear evidence of Sky's racketeering and protection rackets
BTW why are you so obsessed about this thread existing? Its no big deal, its just a thread.
Have you even read any of these books. If you had, and you'd seen some of the absolutely bats*** insane arguments Sky and their authors make in them, you might understand why we would want a seperate thread in which to host a discussion about them.
Particularly funny, from memory, are the claims that Froome trains 4 hours every night with his strava off so that his coaches don't find out and the piece de resistance, the portrayal of Rod Ellingworth as "anti doping"![]()
You equated them releasing books with criminal gangs inserting themselves into the upper echelons of society, so they become institutionalised and difficult to bring to justice. As I said, embarrassing. As for obsession, this is your thread, you posted it, so who is the one obsessed?
Jimmy...Jimmy....Jimmy....![]()
You aren't understanding the rules of the game. One Sky/Brit bashing thread was closed, so another must be opened. Did you not realise this would happen the moment the other thread was locked![]()
Anyway, it is a valid thread topic I think. Wanting to play devil's advocate, I just popped over to the Italian amazon site to try and see if there were books about Astana and Nibali. Not a very fair comparison, because Astana doesn't have the pure association with one nation in terms of team registration and principal riders, in the way that Sky does, but nevertheless there were only two books that I could find about Nibali. This is in stark comparison to Hitch's long list although a couple of his entries are pushing it a bit.
In a sense Sky is a much more homogenous project than any other team since, maybe Mapei, and therefore the literature will coagulate around the one team. But I agree with Hitch in so far as there are a lot of spin offs from this team. I'm not sure it is fair to tie it into doping, as I think all the GT winners (and maybe other race winners too) are doping. I don't believe there is any non-doping GT winning 'control group' against which Sky can be compared. It is up to the teams to make what they can out of their race wins, but I suppose we shouldn't be surprised if a team that is paid for by a media company subsequently makes the most of the media.
By the way, I think you should add team kits to the list of money making ventures. If I see another flabby middle-aged man panting his way along the road on a Pinarello, and stuffed into black and light-blue lycra I'll probably scream.
carton said:Not to rehash some of what was said on a recently locked thread but there are books about Vino in Kazakh. He's a freaking national hero there. Loved this apparent mistranslation in particular "the Olympic champion will be opened in the name of so-called public funds".jens_attacks said:and some ask why people like astana better...
how many book are out there about vino, shefer and zeits?
But yeah, Sky fans do seem to like reading a lot. Who would've thunk it?
roundabout said:carton said:Not to rehash some of what was said on a recently locked thread but there are books about Vino in Kazakh. He's a freaking national hero there. Loved this apparent mistranslation in particular "the Olympic champion will be opened in the name of so-called public funds".jens_attacks said:and some ask why people like astana better...
how many book are out there about vino, shefer and zeits?
But yeah, Sky fans do seem to like reading a lot. Who would've thunk it?
Maybe we should compare Astana to Sky when the leading rider at Sky buys a major race and then has BC cycling reimburse him for the expenses.
gooner said:Benotti69 said:Cricket is hardly a 'clean' sport. Match fixing in cricket is a big problem.
No one is denying that but then it's a stretch to say Pietersen is releasing books to camouflage what you say.
Is it that different that it was the GM that bought the 2012 Tour de France and not the lead rider?roundabout said:carton said:Not to rehash some of what was said on a recently locked thread but there are books about Vino in Kazakh. He's a freaking national hero there. Loved this apparent mistranslation in particular "the Olympic champion will be opened in the name of so-called public funds".jens_attacks said:and some ask why people like astana better...
how many book are out there about vino, shefer and zeits?
But yeah, Sky fans do seem to like reading a lot. Who would've thunk it?
Maybe we should compare Astana to Sky when the leading rider at Sky buys a major race and then has BC cycling reimburse him for the expenses.
JimmyFingers said:Benotti69 said:JimmyFingers said:No you're wrong, book releases are clear evidence of Sky's racketeering and protection rackets
Well if you hire cycling journalists to write your library of cycling books about your team, riders, coaches, managers etc they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them! So yes it is a protection racket.
No no I agree, I'm with this one. Books=doping. It's as clear as day.
More Strides than Rides said:JimmyFingers said:Benotti69 said:JimmyFingers said:No you're wrong, book releases are clear evidence of Sky's racketeering and protection rackets
Well if you hire cycling journalists to write your library of cycling books about your team, riders, coaches, managers etc they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them! So yes it is a protection racket.
No no I agree, I'm with this one. Books=doping. It's as clear as day.
No.
Come on man, you've been part of every sky conversation. The image of Sky is what starts these fires. It is the hypocrisy that lights up the clinic:
The Sky thread is thousands of pages long. Half of those posts are people saying "why do you only accuse sky", and the replies saying "everyone dopes, but only sky fans try to say they don't". The Contador thread isn't endless because there is no narrative being spun to say he is clean, not to the extent of Sky. The Valverde discussion is the same: there aren't a dozen books about him being the greatest since sliced bread.
So why do people care about Sky's narrative? Because we're tired of being lied to. We're tired of being treated like children. We're tired of the arrogance carried by riders and teams as they lead fans by their whimsy into believing a fiction.
That is what this thread is about. It is about a team, who just like any other, is up to no good. But unlike any other, is working so hard, and so successfully, at shoving mistruths, myths and propaganda down our throats. It does so at an oppressive scale
No other team has this kind of propaganda machine, and that machine is worth talking about.
More Strides than Rides said:No other team has this kind of propaganda machine, and that machine is worth talking about.
More Strides than Rides said:JimmyFingers said:Benotti69 said:JimmyFingers said:No you're wrong, book releases are clear evidence of Sky's racketeering and protection rackets
Well if you hire cycling journalists to write your library of cycling books about your team, riders, coaches, managers etc they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them! So yes it is a protection racket.
No no I agree, I'm with this one. Books=doping. It's as clear as day.
No.
Come on man, you've been part of every sky conversation. The image of Sky is what starts these fires. It is the hypocrisy that lights up the clinic:
The Sky thread is thousands of pages long. Half of those posts are people saying "why do you only accuse sky", and the replies saying "everyone dopes, but only sky fans try to say they don't". The Contador thread isn't endless because there is no narrative being spun to say he is clean, not to the extent of Sky. The Valverde discussion is the same: there aren't a dozen books about him being the greatest since sliced bread.
So why do people care about Sky's narrative? Because we're tired of being lied to. We're tired of being treated like children. We're tired of the arrogance carried by riders and teams as they lead fans by their whimsy into believing a fiction.
That is what this thread is about. It is about a team, who just like any other, is up to no good. But unlike any other, is working so hard, and so successfully, at shoving mistruths, myths and propaganda down our throats. It does so at an oppressive scale
No other team has this kind of propaganda machine, and that machine is worth talking about.
wendybnt said:http://stevetilford.com/2015/04/03/astana-is-a-symbol-of-clean-and-honest-sport-vincenzo-nibali/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/16937377
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/riis-says-he-believes-contador-is-clean/
....because the other main GT riders never pretend to be clean![]()