
No fear: Roglic backs his team against Ineos in Tour de France mountains
Last year's runner-up points to strong teammates and importance of the two time trials

Confidence in the team.
Ultimately, however, having saved himself on the previous two sprint days, the Jumbo-Visma all-rounder was again disappointed in Châteauroux, taking eighth place as Mark Cavendish (Deceuninck-QuickStep) celebrated his second stage win of the Tour.
The Belgian, who won two stages at last year's race, said a misjudgement in the finishing straight was to blame for him being out of contention in the final.
***
"I think for me the yellow jersey isn't possible anymore. The two guys in front of me both have the goal to stay there and not lose time. I don't really believe in this and would like to focus on stage wins.
"I feel quite good, but it's just a small margin between this result and wins. I'm still looking for it and I'll keep chasing.
"I still believe in it," he added, referring to taking a stage win at this Tour de France. "I'm not too far from it. I'm just good but not super yet."
Clearly I was very wrong (a brilliant stage some consolationWout still looking for stage wins it seems, personally I think he's clearly somewhat off his best and the team should just get behind Roglic 100% as apart from Pog he probably has the beating of the rest despite the road rash
Has been some time since Kruijswijk showed something good. So might indeed be the teams best option for the GC. Ho far can he go? I fear top 10 is the max for now.What are we thinking about Jonas Vingegaard?
What are we thinking about Jonas Vingegaard?
I like the fact that the team is being realistic and reminding everyone - well... I suppose mostly Danish people... - that he can't be expected to be a top-notch GC rider this quick.
Tour starts and all eyes and cameras are on Roglič and Pogačar. Commentators saying what is Roglič doing. Froome saying common mateship. I know, why would Froome say that, he is not Australian. He would likely use the term bloke. Or something like that. Anyway, at some point people start to notice. As it really shows. Where is van Aert? First they check in the grupetto. Nope, not there. A bit of panic is introduced. Finally they send a motorcycle with a camera up the road. After a few minutes of not so casual cruising. Yes there they are, van Aert and Sagan. Sagan yelling at van Aert let them go and all the shouting was to no avail.
I agree with this, and yet . . . that time trial. Guys built for climbing very rarely can do the race of truth that well. It bodes well for Jonas as a future GC guy (if his climbing ability is equally strong).I like the fact that the team is being realistic and reminding everyone - well... I suppose mostly Danish people... - that he can't be expected to be a top-notch GC rider this quick.
I agree with this, and yet . . . that time trial. Guys built for climbing very rarely can do the race of truth that well. It bodes well for Jonas as a future GC guy (if his climbing ability is equally strong).
So in the end they decided to merge WVA's personal ambitions and the GC fight...#samenwinnen became every man for himself in this Tour.
Van Aert had his goals, Vingegaard has his goals, Sepp Kuss wanted the stage etc. no one worked for a collective goal & that has been the case since day one. The only misfortunes they didn't bring upon themselves were the crashes day 1 & the Gesink abandon (after Thomas caused the crash).
The rest (including Roglic's disaster) was all caused by horrible tactics & split objectives between WVA's personal ambitions on one side & the GC fight on the other.
I think they still have a chance to finish this TDF on a positive note, if they don't all crash out. Possible stage win for WvA later on. Possible high GC placing for Vingegaard, if he's not too banged up from the crash.So in the end they decided to merge WVA's personal ambitions and the GC fight...
I think today clarified things. They will back Vingegaard for the podium nowIt seems like JV have 3 different goals and no plan on how to achieve any of them.
Roglic crashed because he was where he shouldn't be. How WVA is relevant requires more imagination than what was visible on the broadcasts. Losing Gesink and having Kuss, etc. scattered in the peloton was as much a product of the chaos and courses on the first stages. WVA was usually where everyone else should have been.#samenwinnen became every man for himself in this Tour.
Van Aert had his goals, Vingegaard has his goals, Sepp Kuss wanted the stage etc. no one worked for a collective goal & that has been the case since day one. The only misfortunes they didn't bring upon themselves were the crashes day 1 & the Gesink abandon (after Thomas caused the crash).
The rest (including Roglic's disaster) was all caused by horrible tactics & split objectives between WVA's personal ambitions on one side & the GC fight on the other.