Murray,Nadal, and Djokovic are obviously doping.
The first two put on 5 kilos of pure muscle in a single off-season (2 months at the most in tennis), without losing any speed.
Djokovic improved his stamina dramatically and no matter how much I'd like to believe (as I'm Serbian) that this is due to his gluten-free diet, I cannot.
I didn't buy it with Vandevelde, and I won't buy it with Djokovic.
Federer's style of play leaves room for doubt whether he's doping or not, as his game is not as physical as those of the other top 4. He might even be 100% clean these days, though I doubt that was the case 5-6 years ago, when he was playing 90 matches in a season.
All that said, I still feel a clean athlete has a much better shot at winning a tennis tournament than a clean cyclist winning a GT.
So much in tennis is about technique and brain, just remember Marcelo Rios and Fabrice Santor, or Dolgopolov these days.
Cycling-you either have it in the legs and lungs or you don't.
The first two put on 5 kilos of pure muscle in a single off-season (2 months at the most in tennis), without losing any speed.
Djokovic improved his stamina dramatically and no matter how much I'd like to believe (as I'm Serbian) that this is due to his gluten-free diet, I cannot.
I didn't buy it with Vandevelde, and I won't buy it with Djokovic.
Federer's style of play leaves room for doubt whether he's doping or not, as his game is not as physical as those of the other top 4. He might even be 100% clean these days, though I doubt that was the case 5-6 years ago, when he was playing 90 matches in a season.
All that said, I still feel a clean athlete has a much better shot at winning a tennis tournament than a clean cyclist winning a GT.
So much in tennis is about technique and brain, just remember Marcelo Rios and Fabrice Santor, or Dolgopolov these days.
Cycling-you either have it in the legs and lungs or you don't.