Re: Re:
yaco said:
Jagartrott said:
yaco said:
Jagartrott said:
yaco said:
Today's stage showed the folly of 6 riders teams in a week stage race - Especially one on difficult terrain.
This field is quite weak and heterogeneous - I would not extrapolate too much.
The race has 11 WT teams - It's a mixture of strong teams and some weak WT teams - It's a fair sample.
With 2 WT races (Vuelta and Canadian) going on at the same time, it's not possible to have a strong field.
It *is* quite a weak field, and also quite heterogeneous with riders you never see in many other races. That's no shame, it's the same with other non-WT stage races. But I don't think results should be used to make sweeping conclusions about 6-rider teams in major week-long stage races - where the field (and stakes) will be very different.
You make some good arguments - My post was in the context of whether the 91 riders who missed the time cut in the Vuelta stage 15 - Should have been excluded from the race ? That would have left 71 riders and that is 71 tired riders for the last 6 stages, which would have lead to conservative racing - Look at today's stage at the Tour of Britain - The peleton couldn't reel in a breakaway ( who were a touch disorganised ) who had 1m and 30s with 15kms to go.
My post is also taking into account the hilly terrain in the Tour of Britain - It's different to a one week stage race in Holland. Anyway it makes for a good discussion.
The argument that ToB is a weak hetrogenuous field as a validation for not drawing conculsions about 6 man teams is a mute one...
If the field is weak as you say ...which I don't really agree with btw ...its not an argument as both the chasers and breakaway are equally strong (or equally weak) and have a mixture of riders ...And even when you have top ranked UCI riders in 6 man teams will not make any diffference as they will be chasing top UCI riders.....thus the lessons from ToB are good to point to the drawbacks to 6 man teams ...mostly not enough riders to bring back sprint stages ..so sprinters lose out. Also harder to influence GC if again breakaways are not chased.. there will be far more instances of 'lesser' riders riding themselves on to the podium
In fact sprinters will lose out double as many teams not fully dedicated to sprinting will not bring their indidual sprinter to a race as they wil not have the man powerr to chase breakaways or dedicate resource to a sprinter..so I think rather than add to unpredictability races willl become more uniform and homogenous
Also as for the hetrogenous argumet ....that appliesot both break & peloton so makes no difference In ToB Tony Martin , Ian Stannard and co the best chasers in the world but as I said the ToB demonstrates how 6 man teams produce very few sprints or even worse an inability to effect GC
If you have a 6 man team at the Tour , teams will either come for sprints or GC ..and thrre will be clear delimination....so in fact wil add to the predicitability of the race and even the betting .....