- Aug 12, 2010
- 270
- 48
- 9,080
Re:
Still have a couple of hours
manafana said:so its closed, iv a team ready to enter??
Still have a couple of hours
manafana said:so its closed, iv a team ready to enter??
SafeBet said:I have never played this game but one italian rider looks as an absolute must have to me. Surely the easiest pick I made.
I'd categorize only five-six riders as must have this year and two are Italian and I have another I consider to be one of the better bargain from the rest of the riders available.postmanhat said:SafeBet said:I have never played this game but one italian rider looks as an absolute must have to me. Surely the easiest pick I made.
That's got me worried![]()
I have 7 Italians but wouldn't put any of them in that category. I missed Gerrans and Demare last year so hope I haven't made a similar mistake
escartin said:I am still not too sure who these must have Italians are. I am curious to find out. I have 3 and although 2 of them might be on quite a few lists, I could only justify one of them as kind of must have and even then I am not sure he is indispensable. I doubt many people have my 3rd Italian, justifiably so as he is a bit of a risky pick...
skidmark said:It's 23:59 CET on the 3rd, which means it's publication deadline! No more changes, no more teams, feel free to post and discuss starting now.
I'm working on the popularity tab and am about 60 teams in, will try to get done before I have to go out for dinner but it's more likely it'll be up in about 7 hours or so. Until then, let's just have some discussion. Good luck everyone!
skidmark said:Here's my team:
GAVIRIA RENDON Fernando 833
ARU Fabio 777
DENNIS Rohan 738
EWAN Caleb 552
DEGENKOLB John 550
LANDA MEANA Mikel 479
BONIFAZIO Niccolo 347
OOMEN Sam 336
NAVARDAUSKAS Ramunas 282
VIVIANI Elia 275
COSTA Adrien 274
KÖNIG Leopold 264
KÜNG Stefan 225
DOMBROWSKI Joseph Lloyd 158
MACHADO Tiago Jose Pinto 140
VAN DEN BROECK Jurgen 133
MÜHLBERGER Gregor 125
BRESCHEL Matti 116
VERVAEKE Louis 109
BETANCUR GOMEZ Carlos Alberto 108
DANIEL Gregory 104
SCHACHMANN Maximilian 101
ACEVEDO CALLE Janier Alexis 87
SCHLEGEL Michal 83
INTXAUSTI ELORRIAGA Beñat 79
PONZI Simone 78
KÄMNA Lennard 48
PELUCCHI Matteo 45
VAN STAEYEN Michael 27
ARREDONDO MORENO Julian David 17
DOULL Owain 7
MALORI Adriano 2
MCNULTY Brandon 0
MADRAZO said:Squire said:Martin said:I used completely different tactics. First of all I made a team of "must have riders". This year it was around 15 riders. Then I build a long list of riders (this year around 50 names) who for ever the reason I think might do better next year and try to combine them so that in the final, I wont exceed 7500 points and the will have 33 names.Karaev1 said:This is really hard... I already built 2 teams with completely different riders and I am happy with both of them... Can't decide between some old guys that changed teams and should have better season and some really young guys that have a ton of potential...
This year I spend around 7-8 hours creating a team, more then ever before. The short list of must have riders was done within half hour, but then it became a nightmare. I had to alter a game plan, and had to drop some interesting "must have" riders too so I would fit in game rules.
In the end I am confused too ;-)
To the bolded: In my view, there are only 3-4 absolute must-haves. Maybe just two. Most of the other spots in my team have been changing a lot. There are a few more than the must-haves which have been constant, but that's mostly because I decided early on that they would definitely be in my team, and I don't expect them to be in almost everybody else's team.
My strategy analysis for this year was from a slightly different perspective than last time, so this year my team shouldn't look like skidmark's less talented brother. I'm still going for the "scientific approach", but I'm pretty sure I won't top the popularity rankings again this year, and I might even have a potentially unique pick.
Hoping to break into the podium spots in 2017!
I agree this season has the fewest certain picks ever in the game and I also think only 2-4 are completely must haves. Then on the other hand there is a big group of riders that are obviously good picks, and I have also had maybe 10-15 of those in my team at all time besides the 4 certain ones, but all those might end up being sacrificed if needed to fit the puzzle. With the lack of very obvious picks this year I would also predict that the winningscore might end up a bit lower than previous years.
Jancouver said:skidmark said:Here's my team:
GAVIRIA RENDON Fernando 833
ARU Fabio 777
DENNIS Rohan 738
EWAN Caleb 552
DEGENKOLB John 550
LANDA MEANA Mikel 479
BONIFAZIO Niccolo 347
OOMEN Sam 336
NAVARDAUSKAS Ramunas 282
VIVIANI Elia 275
COSTA Adrien 274
KÖNIG Leopold 264
KÜNG Stefan 225
DOMBROWSKI Joseph Lloyd 158
MACHADO Tiago Jose Pinto 140
VAN DEN BROECK Jurgen 133
MÜHLBERGER Gregor 125
BRESCHEL Matti 116
VERVAEKE Louis 109
BETANCUR GOMEZ Carlos Alberto 108
DANIEL Gregory 104
SCHACHMANN Maximilian 101
ACEVEDO CALLE Janier Alexis 87
SCHLEGEL Michal 83
INTXAUSTI ELORRIAGA Beñat 79
PONZI Simone 78
KÄMNA Lennard 48
PELUCCHI Matteo 45
VAN STAEYEN Michael 27
ARREDONDO MORENO Julian David 17
DOULL Owain 7
MALORI Adriano 2
MCNULTY Brandon 0
Haha, very funny. How many times did you change your team after seeing all the other teams huh? Just curious. I mean, be honest!
Degenkolb, Aru, Viviani, Küng really stand out for me. Malori has a lower ceiling but is proably one of the safest and best picks available.Squire said:MADRAZO said:Squire said:Martin said:I used completely different tactics. First of all I made a team of "must have riders". This year it was around 15 riders. Then I build a long list of riders (this year around 50 names) who for ever the reason I think might do better next year and try to combine them so that in the final, I wont exceed 7500 points and the will have 33 names.Karaev1 said:This is really hard... I already built 2 teams with completely different riders and I am happy with both of them... Can't decide between some old guys that changed teams and should have better season and some really young guys that have a ton of potential...
This year I spend around 7-8 hours creating a team, more then ever before. The short list of must have riders was done within half hour, but then it became a nightmare. I had to alter a game plan, and had to drop some interesting "must have" riders too so I would fit in game rules.
In the end I am confused too ;-)
To the bolded: In my view, there are only 3-4 absolute must-haves. Maybe just two. Most of the other spots in my team have been changing a lot. There are a few more than the must-haves which have been constant, but that's mostly because I decided early on that they would definitely be in my team, and I don't expect them to be in almost everybody else's team.
My strategy analysis for this year was from a slightly different perspective than last time, so this year my team shouldn't look like skidmark's less talented brother. I'm still going for the "scientific approach", but I'm pretty sure I won't top the popularity rankings again this year, and I might even have a potentially unique pick.
Hoping to break into the podium spots in 2017!
I agree this season has the fewest certain picks ever in the game and I also think only 2-4 are completely must haves. Then on the other hand there is a big group of riders that are obviously good picks, and I have also had maybe 10-15 of those in my team at all time besides the 4 certain ones, but all those might end up being sacrificed if needed to fit the puzzle. With the lack of very obvious picks this year I would also predict that the winningscore might end up a bit lower than previous years.
I'm curious to see if we agreed on the must-haves. Degenkolb and Viviani should be absolutely nailed on for every team, and for the other semi-must-haves I was thinking along the lines of König and Power. Considered throwing Spilak in there too, but you can easily win the game without him, I guess.
