Almost impossible, I found, to spend at the top of the budget: last year's best riders had such phenomenal performances that it is hard to see them improving, and yet difficult to believe that the tier below them can march in on their territory.
Agreed. That's why I picked only expensive rider (jokes about Pogacar asides, I'm fairly certain it's the same one as Kazistuta) and a bunch of mid priced options. Also I have the wackiest age curve I've ever had for one of my teams. I have a single rider between ages 26-30 (included) because picking riders in their prime is overrated. I also had like two good results ever in this game so don't listen to my advice.
Just to finish up on Pogacar, every single year I have this exact inner monologue: "well he's obviously a super talented rider but he's not cheap and he was so good last year, how much better can he actually get ?". Then at the end of the year I look up and he's one of the best picks of the game anyway and I go I knew it, I can't believe I missed out again, how stupid am I. I know that considering a rider at 3600 points, regardless of who it is, is completely ludicrous. However, I've been burned so much by overlooking him because of his price that I'm this close to nuking my team and starting over and building around him. Can somebody please talk me out of doing something stupid, thanks.
(I know that some people get upset about dropping names before team reveals in the thread but I'm assuming that people entering the CQ game are aware of who Pogacar is, and again considering his price I don't expect him to factor in this year, so I hope that I won't ruffle any feathers).
Lurked the forum for a while but decided to join so i could enter a team. Though there really is no chance of my team doing well as I picked most of the riders based on nationality. Either way looking forward to the season!
You never know what's going to happen. That's the beauty of the game. Sometimes your best picks are the ones that make you feel the most stupid because you're like "well I thought he was talented but I still completely whiffed because I never expected anything close to this". For instance, when I picked Almeida in 2020, my thought process was I liked his style and how he battled in the Tour of Utah the previous year plus he's going to a team where he'll have opportunities to fight for a couple top 10-15 in smaller WT stage races. It's cool that he was basically two days away from winning the Giro but I'm not going to stand here and say that's what I envisioned when I picked him.
And that same year, none of my five most expensive riders, which were the guys I was most confident about, broke even. 3 of the 5 scored less than half their cost. Still if Evenepoel didn't crash in Lombardia I would have finished on the podium. So even when you have a successful team you end up feeling like an idiot. I know that might not sound like fun but it absolutely is.
A year is a long time. You don't want to be stuck with a guy you don't like but included because you felt like he was too big a bargain to pass on. Because that guy might still end up disappointing and then when you watch the rider that you liked at the same price but you felt was inferior value just tear it up, that's just the worst (I did that when I picked Froome instead of Cavendish last year, never again).
So yeah at the end of the day pick riders you like and let the chips fall where they may.