One can only hope!
You're probably not hoping.
I have nothing against him. I am hoping that Bilbao will score a nice amount of points in Slovenia.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
One can only hope!
You're probably not hoping.
I have nothing against him.
Rank | Team | Points this week |
1 | 548 | |
2 | 536 | |
3 | 370 | |
4 | Nevs | 362 |
5 | 345 |
Rank | Team | Up/Down |
1 | (+6) | |
1 | (+6) | |
1 | (+6) | |
1 | (+6) | |
5 | Nevs | (+5) |
5 | (+5) | |
5 | (+5) | |
5 | (+5) | |
5 | (+5) | |
5 | (+5) |
Rank | Team | Total |
1 | 229 | |
2 | 200 | |
3 | 180 | |
4 | 149 | |
5 | 138 |
Rank | Team | Points |
1 | 10471 | |
2 | 9147 | |
3 | 9121 | |
4 | 9045 | |
5 | 8866 | |
6 | 8836 | |
7 | 8702 | |
8 | 8677 | |
9 | 8634 | |
10 | 8627 |
I feel you...My selections are going from bad to worse. Demare can't even get over the smallest hill in Tour de Suisse, TaoGH keeps falling, Leknessund has become a domestique and Mauro Schmid is now king of the failed attack.
My clever plan was to pick guys who were moving team and who (obviously) were going to get more opportunities to perform. The alternative reality is that the reason they were moving teams is that they weren't all that great, but I chose not to believe that.
But so far my big picks have been a disaster
- Demare was meant to drop down and clean up the French Cup races
- Schmid was to show he was a one day star after being wasted at QS
- Welsford, Ewan and Jakobsen were going to win sprints
- Leknessund was going to be a leader at UnoX
And I decided TaoGH and Hayter were going to have great years along with Matis Louvel and Max Poole.
I don't think I could have wasted my picks more if I had tried!
Fair point. Even if we looked at the hypothetical of which of those two picks, if taken as a 34th rider, would be better there would still be no functional difference.* Say you have a unique pick that costed 200 and scored 800 points when everybody else went for another rider that you don't have and that costed 200 and scored 800 points also. Does it matter that your rider has a different name if it ends up canceling out the obvious pick. Do you get more credit for finding the overlooked gem or do should you get dinged for missing the easy pick ?
Well I have both, so all in all a good day today!Foss losing 14 minutes in a stage won by Bauhaus. Why didn't I just go with Riccitello instead?
i feel the same tooconsciously deciding not to pick Bernal despite having him last year is looking like a more and more ill-advised decision as the season goes on...
A. Yates | 0 |
Almeida | 0 |
Bernal | 14 |
Mas | 3 |
Riccitello | 5 |
Skjelmose | 0 |
Onley | 4 |
Pidcock | 1 |
Uijtdebroeks | 12 |
Higuita | 5 |
While I would be happy if none of those things happened.Not really looking forward to the next update as I only have Uijtdebroeks!
I need Cosnefroy and Narvaez to win, or top three, to keep my spot in the rankings.
Biniam to win the Eritrean NC would be nice as well.
That I can do! Just same list with just selecting top 25.@Shakes:
I really like your work, that you did with the page. I use it a lot.
I have a small suggestion for an adaption request.
In the tab "Random stats", there is a section "most popular riders", which only lists the 25 most popular riders until now.
Is there a possibility, that you can add a list with all riders and the information how many players picked them and additionally (how it is already now), when you click on them you see also which players picked them?
For me this information would be great, because when I follow a race, it´s somtimes good to know, how many other players have them, to know if I should cheer for him or not.
For me it´s right now more or less the only time, when I still use the Excel Spreadsheet.
In the section "most popular riders" there also seems to be a small bug, since we only have 94 teams and the section says, that 105 players picked Quintana..
shalgo has you beat in the Belgium tour too, with Segaert. And in Slovenia, with Zambanini. You outscore him in the Baby Giro though, with Magnier's 10 points!Look at the Belgium Tour GC: finally a week I don't killed for missing Cosnefroy maybe I can make up some ground.
Look at the Tour de Suisse GC: see shalgo's pick are 4th, 5th, 12th and 13th.
Nevermind.
Let's agree to call it a draw and not award any point this week then.shalgo has you beat in the Belgium tour too, with Segaert. And in Slovenia, with Zambanini. You outscore him in the Baby Giro though, with Magnier's 10 points!![]()