Just thought it was funny to read "Sagan" and "unsuccessful stint at the World Tour" in the same sentence.
Sure, but there's a little something called context.
Just thought it was funny to read "Sagan" and "unsuccessful stint at the World Tour" in the same sentence.
Especially since I was talking about Kump with that reference and not Sagan.Sure, but there's a little something called context.
But will you score as well in PostNord Tour as he did in Itzulia?Though, I suspect/hope that my national-themed team will be slightly more successful than Samu's national-themed team, even though he didn't actually stick to the theme.
**NOTE: I have made a specific rule to deal with the unique case of Dylan Groenewegen, who has faced a long suspension for a non-doping offense. Briefly, he is to be treated the same as dopers, available for his 2019 cost for both the 2021 and 2022 editions of the game.
Do we have an authoritative answer as to whether Nairo Quintana is priced at 665 (2022 points with the Tour de France removed), 992 (2022 including his apparent TdF points before they were removed) or his 2021 score of 758?
(It would be brave to pick him when it is still uncertain whether he has a 2023 team, but...)
@Armchair cyclist and all interested, Nairo will cost his straight-up CQ cost of 665. It's a tricky situation as he wasn't really suspended and did not commit an ADRV. But of course the DQ sort of crosses the spirit of the doping rule. But I've decided on 665 as the cost.
No, that was in last year's thread.I'm confused now as I can't find that quote from @skidmark regarding Quintana. Just to clearify for myself and others: Quintana costs 665 points?
Ah, that makes sense then. Couldn't understand it either, as I was sure I hadn't read anything about that this year. Sorry for any misunderstanding my post might have caused.No, that was in last year's thread.
Click on “skidmark said:”.I'm confused now as I can't find that quote from @skidmark regarding Quintana. Just to clearify for myself and others: Quintana costs 665 points?
I will be consistent with what I said for Quintana last year then, so he'll be 51. I'll have to rethink this for future years in situations like this - there is a strong case to be made that if someone gets their score lowered with a DQ they should not be available for that score the following year, ADRV or not. But for this case, Baudin will be 51.@skidmark Alex Baudin: 51 or 76 cost?
I already have my team sent in, so it doesn't affect my squad, but in the light of the press release today it might be worth a clarification.
No recommendation intended, and if anyone objects to a rider being named here that might be seen as such I will delete.
That spreadsheet is now loaded at the CQ site, so you can check for yourselves if you are concerned about the legitimacy of your team.We've got 21 teams submitted so far everyone! Thanks to those who have sent in so far. A reminder to expect the year-end CQ update on December 31st, and there are sometimes minor tweaks. I will do my best to upload the final update to the 'create your team' spreadsheet as early as possible on the 31st so you can double check.
No riders under 30 points?!Team submitted. Some random statistics: Riders from 19 different countries, Italy and Spain with 4 riders each. Average age 24,6 years based on CQ download from November so probably close to 25 now. No riders over 850 points and no riders below 30 points. So if there is a new Tarling amongst the zero pointers, I have certainly missed him. Good luck to everyone and looking forward to team reveal as always!
Can't wait to see who has selected from Equatorial Guinea...Four riders from Finland? Brave choice.![]()
Only 31 riders? 33 are allowed, so I would advice to add 2 more riders.I just submitted my team, from Liège (Belgium).
I chose cyclists from :
UK 5
F 4
Norw 4
B 4
I 2
Col 2
USA 2
Irl 2
S Afr 1
Germ 1
DK 1
Eq 1
Sw 1
Tchek 1