The 2025 CQ Ranking Manager Thread

Page 15 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Okay, my only obvious miss was Bagioli, who I didn't notice.. possibly wouldn't have picked him anyway, though.

But I have to ask what the Behrens hype is all about? I never really paid any attention to him, but was his WC win (which I granted didn't watch) really that impressive that it swayed ppl? Remember how Baroncinis first year post-wc was? And that was an impressive win IMO.
 
May 14, 2009
61
4
8,685
I picked Behrens because of how highly they talked about him in the Laterne Rouge podcast. Wouldnt have picked him otherwise as I would think a rider of his stature would be more suited to a few years under the belt to be competitive among the pros.
 
Okay, my only obvious miss was Bagioli, who I didn't notice.. possibly wouldn't have picked him anyway, though.

But I have to ask what the Behrens hype is all about? I never really paid any attention to him, but was his WC win (which I granted didn't watch) really that impressive that it swayed ppl? Remember how Baroncinis first year post-wc was? And that was an impressive win IMO.
Read an article, where his U23 coach says, that he will become certainly one of the best riders in the world.
That was enough for me to pick him..
 
  • Like
Reactions: manafana and abbulf
Sente Sentjens is an exellent young procpect! He could do sprints, TTs, and Classics among the juniors. He maxed out 1500 watts in the sprint at the E3 Saxo Bank Classic, which he won easily. Honestly there is so much potential in that kid!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmZM0xDXPgg


His father (Roy) is former professonal with Rabobank and Lotto and winner of Kuurne-Brussel-Kuurne in 2003. His mother Inn Stevens, won the national Belgian champioships in the junior category back in 1998.

His price tag was 89 points I see. I found that a little too high for a development squad rider, but depending on your narrative for success, I guess it could work out. If your OK with a smaller profit at least- Personally there were other options in that price range I found more reliable at least in 2025.

Noa Isidore is a puncher/fast man type rider who theoretically could vacuum some good points if Decathlon knit together a solid French calendar for him! I am a bit more skeptical about how he matches up against international talent though - by all means, he is a good prospect, I'm just not quite sold on him yet.

Admittedly I do have a weakness for riders who power up the climb to Motuvun. + His rider repertoire is CQ-friendly, so I can see the signs of a potentially solid pick in 2025.
Thx for the insights!
 
  • Like
Reactions: abbulf and Jakob747
Calculator program must have failed her.

It worked just fine. Like I said, I just didn't want to drop one of my other riders in order to squeeze him in.
And if I had decided to squeeze in a more expensive rider, I would have been much more likely to add both Mads P and his lidl brother, and then Just Pedersen for free, in order to reach full Pedersen potential.

I see you don't have Vingegaard either; your hatred for people named 'Hansen' has not waned?
 
It worked just fine. Like I said, I just didn't want to drop one of my other riders in order to squeeze him in.
And if I had decided to squeeze in a more expensive rider, I would have been much more likely to add both Mads P and his lidl brother, and then Just Pedersen for free, in order to reach full Pedersen potential.

I see you don't have Vingegaard either; your hatred for people named 'Hansen' has not waned?
I understand.

I prefer yo-yos instead.

And no handball players who scores against my country :)
 
It worked just fine. Like I said, I just didn't want to drop one of my other riders in order to squeeze him in.
And if I had decided to squeeze in a more expensive rider, I would have been much more likely to add both Mads P and his lidl brother, and then Just Pedersen for free, in order to reach full Pedersen potential.

I see you don't have Vingegaard either; your hatred for people named 'Hansen' has not waned?
GIven Hellemose made a miraculous comeback to WT, I'm waiting for the second coming of the Jesper Hansen-show.
 
I will comment on some other posts later, but first, my own team (this will probably be a loooong post!).

As the record holder for most 2nd places (three times!), can I finally get that elusive win? As I said pre-reveal, I've had my 2025 team more or less ready since October bar the final shuffles, and most of it kinda picked itself.

I'll put my actual team in BOLD, and people I strongly considered in ITALICS. This might be a bit messy and confusing if you're just skimming through, but I guess if you just want to see my team you'll find it in the spreadsheet, and if you want my thoughts you put up with the mess. :D

VINGEGAARD HANSEN Jonas (1760 points, 33 picks) - An absolute no-brainer for me, considering the (lack of) options in the medium price range this year and the abundance of good cheap picks. I'm baffled that he's not more popular. I just need him to clear 2000 points to be a good pick, and likely he'll score quite a bit more with at least one extra one-weeker and another GT. I was always sure the Giro rumours were never going to happen this year, so I was never worried about that either. In any case, there's almost no risk. For almost every race he does, he's more likely to win it than not, which is insane for this game.

VAN AERT Wout (1259 points, 60 picks) - The first iteration of my team had Vingegaard and Van Aert, because they are the clear and obvious ones, right? WVA was never quite as obvious to me though. His level has markedly declined since 2022, and despite looking great again in the recent Vuelta, I'm not convinced he can get back to his 2021/2022 level of consistent beastlyness. There there's the crashes and injuries. He says he's still feeling the pain from his Vuelta injury when racing CX. Then there's the eggs/basket distribution. If the classics season goes wrong, that's him pretty much done for as a great pick, especially with two GTs (partly in service of both a sprinter and a climber) and no Worlds on the cards. He can of course still be a great pick, but I'm really surprised that the popularity between him and Vingegaard isn't inverted.

PIDCOCK Thomas (996 points, 1 pick) - When Pidcock was announced for Q36.5, I put him in my team instead of Van Aert. At some point he's gonna do the Alaphilippe 2000 point season, and potential race program is a big factor for me in this game. With his new team, he has all the opportunities to farm points in races that are perfect for him. WT one-dayers, one-week stage races, Italian autumn classics and various other one-dayers. No CX is also a plus. But his actual season plans haven't been released yet and you never know what he comes up with (MTB or no MTB?), and so quite recently I decided to go with a safer pick (see below). I've had Pidcock every year since 2021, and you better believe that when I finally drop him is when he finally delivers on all of his promise!

ALMEIDA Joao Pedro Gonçalves (988 points, 4 picks) - Mou the prophet says he's gonna improve! No, but seriously, I'm extremely pleased Almeida is such a rare pick. Even if he doesn't improve, there's still the fact that his level warranted more points in most of the races he did last year except the Tour. He was a domestique in the first part of the year, then would have won the Tour de Suisse bar team tactics, then left the Vuelta while in a good spot, then crashed at the Worlds. This year he'll be leader almost everywhere, and that really is everywhere! Look at that juicy schedule! Only downside is a bit of proneness to illness, but that's mitigated by the fact that he's good enough to podium basically every stage race he does pre-Tour, then he can top 5 the Tour even as a domestique, then who knows what he can do in the Vuelta, but it should be good. In any case, he's about as safe as they come in terms of expensive picks, and that's really what you want.

VINE Jay (464 points, 11 picks) - I was gonna pick him last year as my most expensive rider, then shortly before deadline I dropped him because he was not defending his TDU win. Turned out to be a good decision in all sorts of ways. But now he's doing the TDU again. In the meantime he has developed into a world-class TT specialist. In 2023 he got almost all of his 586 points in January. In 2024 he got zero points in January, but managed to amass 464 in the rest of the year despite being out for most of it. I think he's very underrated, and very glad he's so rare.

PLAPP Lucas (423 points, 20 picks) - Third year in a row that he's on my team, so I've been following him closely and I've become a bit of a fan. He crashed out of the TDU when likely to get a big haul of points there last year, and then basically didn't score any points after Paris-Nice. I think he's secretly becoming a top tier TT-er, and just like Vine he could be close to breaking even in January already. Then surely he must have better luck for the rest of the year than he's had for the past couple of seasons.

PENHOËT Paul (415 points, 15 picks) - The top sprinter on FDJ usually scores roughly 1000 points a season. Penhoët was out for almost half the season, and still scored 400+, so that kinda checks out. He's incredibly consistent and position-savvy, and will still do a lot of French races even if he gets an all-round tougher schedule with a possible first GT. He wasn't happy with his results/performances last year, so that indicates that he believes he can do better.

MAGNIER Paul (405 points, 37 picks) - Scoring 405 points by being a complete beast in the very few pro races he did last year? I'll have some more of that, thank you very much. Actually thought he would be a bit more rare, but I guess other people have also seen what I've seen. I said before last year's game that Magnier (who I against my better judgement actually didn't pick) was my top candidate for a potential new De Lie. That feeling has just been reinforced over the past year and I'm happy he's still so 'cheap'.

The four riders above were really the only ones in the 400-950 range that I was attracted to (except having Ciccone in my very first draft and looking a little bit at Gall). Guys like Yates, Nys, Ganna, Gregoire, Hindley, Healy, Tarling and Pithie were never really seriously considered.

DUNBAR Edward (342 points, 7 picks) - Dunbar was part of the puzzle to fill the last few spots on the team. I had an awkward amount of points left, which wasn't enough for some guys I wanted and too much for some other guys I wanted, so I had to chuck in a mid-range guy that I wasn't overly keen on to make it all work. I had Quinn Simmons as that guy for a while, but landed on Dunbar in the end. He has had a lot of bad luck at Jayco, and showed some good things when healthy, so he's at least quite safe to improve a bit on his cost with a rather high ceiling if things go really well.

RICCITELLO Matthew (333 points, 17 picks) - Not the first name on my team sheet, but I've warmed to him after including him quite late in the process. He's a bit similar to my Onley, Poole and Tiberi picks from last year, who were all quite successful for me. I'm also encouraged by Riccitello saying in interviews that he wasn't surprised by his Tour de Suisse level, and he believed he was good enough for a possible top 5 or so in the Vuelta when he started the race.

HAYTER Ethan (263 points, 58 picks) - Hayter last year was one of the more frustrating experiences I've had with this game. Apparently I'm a masochist, so I'm coming back for more. Unfortunately Lefevere is not around anymore to kick the backside of riders not performing, but hopefully Hayter will become a regular Het Nieuwsblad reader. In all seriousness though, Hayter's ceiling is a bit too high to leave out.

JAKOBSEN Fabio (189 points, 31 picks) - He was the likely popular guy I mentioned I was torn about in a post a few days ago. Putting him and Dinham in for Bisiaux and Kajamini would have made my team infinitely more boring, but it would have hit exactly 7500. Jakobsen has done good things for my CQ teams in the past, but pure sprinters are not really all the rage these days. Even if he improves, he's still gonna have the problem of bad positioning and a bad train. I'm just not excited enough about him, so I'm taking my chances without him.

LAFAY Victor (182 points, 36 picks) - Not able to ride until July, Lafay was one of the first ones on my longlist. His final part of the season managed the rare feat of giving me good reason to trust in a good 2025 without making him way too expensive. Also AG2R magic.

SOSA CUERVO Ivan Ramiro (177 points, 3 picks) - Was one of the last cuts from my team. I'm surprised he's only picked three times, but I also realize he's a very typical me pick and maybe not your average popular pick. Having a full season of only those small climby races that he always does well in can see him score quite heavily, but there's also a chance he's kinda done.

UIJTDEBROEKS Cian (176 points, 80 picks) - Ugh... I was unconvinced last year, and thank God for that. I'm also unconvinced now, but he's one of those defensive picks you just gotta put up with. And his popularity has proven me right about that.

NORDHAGEN Jørgen (165 points, 52 picks) - I've probably known for about three years that no matter what, I was gonna pick Nordhagen for the CQ game when he turned pro. It's just a bonus that he's kept himself somewhat cheap by missing some big U23 races, while at the same time looking like a million dollars racing with a lot of energy on flat-ish courses in Belgium and Germany.

WIDAR Jarno (162 points, 37 picks) - Was humming and hawing a bit over Widar, but decided not to pick him. He could be a great pick, but it's very dependent on whether he does well in the early season pro races. From April onwards it's hard to see him do significantly better than last year. With all the U23 races he's down to do, there's not much room for a Sibiu Tour or similar. It'll be slightly annoying if he gets 500 points, but I don't think he is ever likely to get much more than that, and as such he's not a complete must-have.

STAUNE-MITTET Johannes (150 points, 32 picks) - I still believe. I believe a bit less, but I still believe.

GEOGHEGAN HART Tao (137 points, 71 picks) - A bit like Cian in that you just have to have him. And he reminds me of my Bernal pick last year. Even if TGH doesn't reach his old heights, he did have the level for much more points last year.

DE SCHUYTENEER Steffen (125 points, 20 picks) - Would have been nice if he didn't go to China to make himself both more expensive and more well-known, but I'll still take him. Could already be good enough to be second or third sprinter at Lotto, and that should mean quite a lot of points opportunities. He also thinks he's a bit of a classics guy.

TORRES ARIAS Pablo (122 points, 70 picks) - I saw him being a beast of a domestique in Giro d'Abruzzo, and put him on my longlist immediately. Last year I picked Del Toro, Christen and Morgado despite not being convinced that all of them would deliver, but I'm glad I did. There is a world where Torres also doesn't quite deliver yet, but he obviously has to be in my team.

BEHRENS Niklas (115 points, 46 picks) - I didn't actually consider him very strongly at all, I just wanted to mention him here because he's the U23 champ and very popular. My thinking with Behrens is that he's not quite fast enough to get sprint results at pro level and not punchy enough to get hilly results. Winning a tough race like the U23 Worlds because you're hard as nails is impressive, but that 'skill' isn't guaranteed to be immediately transferable to getting results at pro level. Svrcek can attest to that.

KÄMNA Lennard (108 points, 63 picks) - A mixture of a fanboy pick and a defensive pick in case he recovers quickly. Didn't dare to drop him. Also because as a bit of a Kämna fan, that would have diminished my happiness if he returns to form after the crash.

BAGIOLI Andrea (106 points, 56 picks) - I've been a Bagioli fan since he was a junior, but oh boy is he a frustrating rider to like. When I finally dropped him from my CQ teams he actually delivered a high-scoring season (but still mostly due to one week of form). Again I'm not convinced, but it's a bit too risky to leave him out.

LOUVEL Matîs (101 points, 12 picks) - Half a season on the sidelines, and also some issues the year before, but the talent is obvious. Also gets results quite consistently in smaller races when things are as they should. His new team seems a good fit too.

KAJAMINI Florian Samuel (96 points, 11 picks) - Decided quite early on that I was just gonna take a punt on him, a bit like I did with Tiberi last year. Apart from that, he's not really comparable to Tiberi of course, but I like my Italians and Kajamini is among the more exciting of them. He seems to be a results-getter, and I think he will have a lot of opportunities for that at Astana despite a lot of similar rider types. But the Ulissis, Higuitas and Velascos will probably do bigger races, and if my gut feeling is right, Kajamini should be better than some of the other climby/hilly types that will do smaller races for the team.

DEL GROSSO Tibor (95 points, 22 picks) - Seems very highly rated in the Netherlands, is bossing the U23 CX scene and did really well on the road last year too. Was quite a late inclusion, because I didn't properly get my eyes up for him until recently, but I like this pick. He's gonna do a proper road season this year, and Alpecin's calendar should be perfect for him especially now that Laurance is gone.

BAX Sjoerd (86 points, 8 picks) - Surprisingly rare, but again, like I mentioned with Sosa, he might just be a typical me pick. His argument that he has won 100% of the races where he got his chance at UAE (which is one race) shows some confidence, and he won't lack opportunities at Q36.5.

CAVAGNA Remi (80 points, 52 picks) - Was floating about in the final shuffles, but didn't make it in the end. He will probably get some good results like he almost always does, and will probably do well in the Poitou-Charentes tour, but his road to good results is just a bit too unreliable to be an absolute certainty for my team. And he would have been frustrating to have if he continued to only do the occasional good TT.

KRON Andreas Lorentz (68 points, 70 picks) - No-brainer pick, and that shows in his popularity. Even in his extremely disrupted 2024 season he had time to show that he was still good (despite not being rewarded with many points) and should feast on the 1.1 races with Uno-X while also being a bit of a threat in bigger ones.

BISIAUX Léo (63 points, 37 picks) - He got what was basically the final spot on my team. I played with some other combinations instead of him and Kajamini, like Widar + someone cheap or Jakobsen + Dinham. But Bisiaux, who I've been a bit hyped about since he was a 1st year junior, just seemed more exciting even if it could be a bit too early for him. He was also in danger of being cut for Faure Prost or Pollefliet or August, but hopefully his stayer ability translates to the races.

VADER Milan (52 points, 26 picks) - The Pidcock transfer didn't exactly improve the prospects of Vader, and there's also the worry that even though he complains about lack of freedom at Visma, he didn't really perform when he had it either, at least not last year. But the upside is just too big to leave him out.

VERMEERSCH Florian (51 points, 74 picks) - Another clearly obvious pick. It helps that I picked him for my Emerging riders CQ game when his career total was only 16 points (as one of only two managers), so I feel a bit like he's 'my guy'.

KAMP Alexander (48 points, 22 picks) - A bit of an enigma, but Intermache are good with these guys, and I like to believe he has enough opportunities and motivation to do well before the atmosphere inevitably turns sour at some point.

GLOAG Thomas (46 points, 62 picks) - Returning from my team last year, and one of the first one the team sheet. Let's not miss more or less the entire season because of crashes this time, shall we?

SENECHAL Florian (37 points, 40 picks) - A somewhat late inclusion, and it's not a guarantee that he'll return to a really high level, but I'd love to see him do well again. And with all sorts of fast guys leaving the team, he shouldn't lack opportunities. He's also not ancient yet.

VAN BAARLE Dylan (35 points, 75 picks) - He has stayed in my team since the very first draft, but he was considered for getting the boot late on. He has always relied on a few big results for his points, and Visma have more and more guys that could be ahead in likelihood of achieving those. But when he wasn't injured last year he still looked strong, and the possibility of a Tratnik 2024 kind of scoring scenario is a bit too big to leave Van Baarle out, I think.

TULETT Ben (27 points, 56 picks) - Another obvious one. Yes, Visma is stacked, but there are always enough opportunities for riders of Tulett's calibre to get 300-400 points in every team, basically.

HELLEMOSE Asbjørn (0 points, 13 picks) - Didn't pick him, but part of me really wanted to. I picked him for an Emerging riders CQ game a few years ago as a unique pick, and although he didn't quite emerge, it would have been nice to have extra reason to cheer for him this year. And although I see a scenario where he turns out to be a decent pick (a few 8th places in races like Slovenia, which Jayco do quite a lot of), I just think the risk is a bit big for a lack of very good upside.

PHILIPSEN Albert Withen (0 points, 70 picks) - He didn't. So I picked him.

SEIXAS Paul (0 points, 66 picks) - As has been mentioned several times in connection to this game, only four first-year U23s have been great/good picks: Evenepoel, Tarling, Uijtdebroeks and Adrien Costa. AWP and Seixas have the possibility of breaking into that list, I think. As for other great first-years, like Finn, it will statistically not happen when they don't turn pro directly. Costa is the only one who did that, and that was a bit of a special case because he got to ride the 2.HC Tour of Utah where he got a lot of cheap points for 2nd place.

Returning to what I said at the top about hoping to finally win this game; when looking at the strategies of other teams and the lack of popularity of some of my picks that I'm really confident in, I think this year is one of my best chances ever to get the big W. Still need a good portion of luck, of course, but that caveat is always a given.

I have a similar feeling as I had at the start of 2016 when I returned to the game with a very analytical approach and was very confident about my team (finished 4th), and similar to 2018 when I was also very confident in my strategy (finished 2nd). My approach to making my teams has actually switched more towards gut feeling and pattern recognition than rigourous analysis over the years, but that seems to work equally well for me.
 
Okay before I call it a night here in North America, I'm itching to talk at least a little bit of game. And the most interesting internal decision I had in this game was whether to Vingegaard or not to Vingegaard. And then secondarily, if not Vinge, who?

I considered a ton of riders on the more expensive end (600+) as plausible choices: Vinge & Van Aert were the first that came to mind, but also Ayuso, Skjelmose (sort of), Kooij, Almeida, Del Toro, Gregoire, Laporte, Nys, Pithie, Lipowitz, Ganna, Healy, and S Yates. When I looked at potential range of 2025 scores, I had WvA at 2200-2800, and I had Vinge at pretty much the same, but 500 points more cost. So WvA was locked in, but I had to take a hard look at Vinge cuz none of the others were slam dunks.

I ended up with Gregoire and Almeida, let's make the cases and then come back to the opportunity cost.

Joao Almeida (988 points, 4 teams) - I had an irrational dislike of Joao Almeida right from 2020. I think it was one of those sports fan kind of things, where you just don't like someone but you don't know why. I think probably part of it was that I considered him but then didn't pick him for my CQ team and he ended up being one of the best picks, to be honest. But on the athletic level, he's won me over as my kind of rider. Grinds it out, never easy, but never can count him out. I think the tipping point was on the teammate level too at the Tour this year where he not only was professional, but enthusiastic, in backing his more talented teammate. Many athletes have trouble with that as you've gotta have an ego to get to the top, but he was impressive in his steadfastness.

But anyway, the CQ game. Almeida scores at every stage race he's in basically. His scores are 1114 as a neo, 1650, 940, 1405, and 988. The two scores under 1000 were years where he was 4th on the Giro on stage 18 when he abandoned with covid, and when he was 3rd in the Vuelta on stage 7 and dropping the next day before abandoning after realizing he had covid. So, in a 2-GT year I'd expect 14-1500 to be his baseline. Of course, you want to guard against disaster with expensive picks, so really even if he goes out of 1 GT it's 900ish baseline.

And then they've already posted the majority of his 2024 calendar. Valencia, Algarve, P-N, Itzulia, Romandie, Suisse, TdF, Vuelta. Okay it's a long season and things can change, but that's a lot of points scoring opportunity. He's arguably the best GC rider outside the Big 4, and every other year he's never done more than like 4 of those 1-week races, but this year he's down for 6. Health willing, he could get up to 1800 in my opinion. Sold!

Romain Gregoire (840 points, 3 teams) - his 2 pro seasons came in his age 20 (turned 20 in January so close enough) and age 21 seasons, and he had 784 and 840 points. No injuries or anything, so his progression looks modest. The bull case:

1) He's a threat for points at virtually every race he's in. His base is well covered, so even if he gets injured sometime he can basically Valverde results through the year to make up for it. Many, many single digit placings in his resume. With expensive riders, I always want to make sure the downside isn't catastrophic. He has the potential to be Jalabert 2.0.

2) His neo-pro year at (barely) age 20 was 784 points. The recent gold standard for turning pro young is Remco who got 900+ at 19, but hey he's beyond special. Ayuso at 19-20 got 1007, Cian got 574, Pogi got 1559 at 20-21. So, decent company, and more solid than the Brenners and Simmons' of the world.

3) What really convinced me was when I broke down his points. In 2023, he rode 63 days, which were 39 WT, 24 non-WT. He got 184 WT points, the rest non-WT (including wins in 2.PS Dunkerque and 2.1 Limousin. which accounted for 366 points). In 2024, he rode 68 days, which were 58 WT, 10 non-WT. Out of 840 total, 462 points were WT points, ie much fewer cheap points. He doesn't have another level of races to go up, so if he progresses he'll just get more points.

My upside case is based on the points for higher placings that come with general improvement. For example, if instead of finishing 12th, 7th, and 24th at the Ardennes classics, he finished 5th, 3rd and 10th, that'd gain him 143 points. Or turning 13th at Tirenno and 4th at Pologne into 6th and 2nd, >100 point gain too. Or if he translates his winning nature into getting on the top step? He could more than double his score. So there's a lot to be excited about, even if the range is like 900-2000 wide.

_______________________________________________________________________________

The opportunity cost is Vingegaard. He's an interesting one to forecast. Basically he can dominate any stage race Pog isn't in at this point, so it's hard to imagine him getting less than the 1700 he got in 2024. But the 3100 he got in 2023? Well definitely if Pog crashes out and the Tour is for the taking it is possible. But if the Pog factor makes 2nd at the Tour the new expectation, take away the leader points etc and his 2023 tops out at 25-2700ish. Will he want to do a 2nd GT if it's the Vuelta and he's gonna get his butt kicked again? It's funny because his rise is a really cool story and he's obviously tough as nails as his comeback this year proved, but I get the feeling he wants to be selective (ie. avoid Pog) and is a bit fragile. Not sure how much I trust him, and 2600 expected return on 1700 is good. But not slam dunk.

An exercise I like is one I've seen a few people on here do (but especially thread-but-not-game-participant Netserk) where you break down a team difference to rider1 + rider2 vs rider3 + rider4. Almeida and Gregoire cost 62 points more than Vingegaard. Let's slot in a cheap popular rider I didn't pick in Bagioli (108). Will Vingegaard + Bagioli yield more expected points than my two? Well if I expect 2200-2800 from Vingegaard and 200-500 from Bagioli, median is 2850, high end 3300. Let's give Almeida 1000-1800 and Gregoire 900-1900, that'd be median 2800, high end 3700. So not much in it, but maybe more high end hope. I guess in the end the tiebreaker was to go with guys I was more excited about. This is a yearlong game and I wanna have fun.

Anyway, that's my thought exercise for today! Please weigh in with any of your 'I took these guys instead of these guys' musings, love that stuff.
Mentally, I think Vingegaard is in a much better place (for this game) than Van Aert is, so I would gladly bet (for bragging rights or avatar) that he not only scores more, but that he will earn a greater profit in this game than Silver Pozzato will. At this point, I simply think Van Aert has tilted too hard and that he doesn't have the physical edge to make up for it.
 
Very satisfied with my team despite being near the bottom of the popularity ranking (I like picking outsiders so no real surprise)! The only one I had overlooked of the popular picks is Tao G Hart, and he wouldn't have made the cut anyway. So I have five unique picks and 7 others picked by less than 10 teams to root for in 2025. Would probably have replaced Caleb Ewan if I knew that he wasn't listed for Jayco, but apart from that I still think that my team has every chance to do well in 2025. Would be interesting to hear if anyone actually considered any of my five unique picks:
Steff Cras
Kim Heiduk
Pavel Novak
Michele Gazzoli
Iker Mintegi
 
My team:

VAN AERT Wout
GANNA Filippo
YATES Simon
CICCONE Giulio
GALL Felix
MAGNIER Paul
HIGUITA GARCIA Sergio Andres
LUTSENKO Alexey
BUSATTO Francesco
HAYTER Ethan
VERNON Ethan
LAMPAERT Yves
KRAGH ANDERSEN Søren
LAFAY Victor
UIJTDEBROEKS Cian
GEOGHEGAN HART Tao
ENGELHARDT Felix
TORRES ARIAS Pablo
BEHRENS Niklas
KÄMNA Lennard
BAGIOLI Andrea
ARTZ Huub
CAVAGNA Rémi
KRON Andreas Lorentz
VADER Milan
VERMEERSCH Florian
KAMP Alexander
SCHELLING Ide
SENECHAL Florian
VAN BAARLE Dylan
GESBERT Elie
DINHAM Matthew
PHILIPSEN Albert Withen
 
Mentally, I think Vingegaard is in a much better place (for this game) than Van Aert is, so I would gladly bet (for bragging rights or avatar) that he not only scores more, but that he will earn a greater profit in this game than Silver Pozzato will. At this point, I simply think Van Aert has tilted too hard and that he doesn't have the physical edge to make up for it.
Honest question: why don't you play? (have you ever played?)
 
The guy finished 5th in Flanders as a 20 years old and didn't score many points in the 2nd half of the season. I think there's a huge upside in him with the right calendar and right form. Arguably this is a risky pick but he is exactly the type of rider that I can see going from 400 to 1500-ish points, considering his versatility and how UAE was able to develop young riders recently. It's far from guaranteed but if it happens, I don't want to be the one who missed out on picking him.
Still, it wasn't like he wasn't riding in the second part of the season. He was racing, but simply didn't perform. So that is part of the reason I'm wobbling on him. It's not that he isn't talented. I had him last season for a reason. I'm just not wanting to gamble on him taking the next big leap right away.

Another factor is that he's not really a climbing talent like Tiberi, Del Toro or Jan Christen etc. And he's not really a super sprinter from what I've seen so it's hard to really know what his ceiling is in terms of what types of races he can win. He was 5th in De Ronde but he consistently said that he didn't like cobbles and it seemed more that he was sent to the cobbled classics because UAE didn't have anyone else to send there. At least that's what it felt like at the time.
 
Collective Wisdom team

The most popular 32 riders fit comfortably within the budget, to the extent that the most expensive of the riders on 22 teams can be included to round out the team.

Could I ask @skidmark to include that group in the spreadsheet (I usually put them at the bottom of the results page so that they don't interfere with the rankings.

UIJTDEBROEKS Cian
VAN BAARLE Dylan
VERMEERSCH Florian
GEOGHEGAN HART Tao
TORRES ARIAS Pablo
PHILIPSEN Albert Withen
KRON Andreas Lorentz
SEIXAS Paul
KÄMNA Lennard
GLOAG Thomas
VAN AERT Wout
HAYTER Ethan
BAGIOLI Andrea
TULETT Ben
NORDHAGEN Jørgen
CAVAGNA Rémi
BEHRENS Niklas
DINHAM Matthew
SENECHAL Florian
BISIAUX Léo
WIDAR Jarno
MAGNIER Paul
LAFAY Victor
VINGEGAARD HANSEN Jonas
BRENNAN Matthew
GESBERT Elie
STAUNE-MITTET Johannes
JAKOBSEN Fabio
CARTHY Hugh
VADER Milan
GANNA Filippo
AUGUST Andrew
GALL Felix


Those who have most, and least, of those 33 (obviously a high correlation to the popularity rankings:


And those who have spent most (or least) on riders among the Collective Wisdom group:

Interesting, I have 13 of the collective wisdom team, but obviously only the cheaper ones ...
 
Honest question: why don't you play? (have you ever played?)
I get too annoyed by how poorly I'd do, and I greatly enjoy the discussion in this thread regardless of having a team or not.

I also don't much like the process of creating a team the times I have participated. If I can get in a mood where I'd enjoy that, then it wouldn't matter how my team performed.

I'm greatly thankful for all the participants in this game, as I get to enjoy standing on the sidelines thanks to them.
 
Last edited:
Okay, my only obvious miss was Bagioli, who I didn't notice.. possibly wouldn't have picked him anyway, though.

But I have to ask what the Behrens hype is all about? I never really paid any attention to him, but was his WC win (which I granted didn't watch) really that impressive that it swayed ppl? Remember how Baroncinis first year post-wc was? And that was an impressive win IMO.
Way more impressive for me. It completely changed my perception of him as a rider.
Plus he's joining Visma.
 
Hey, @Shakes.
I see Øxenberg is listed wrongly on the website.
It's HANSEN Peter Øxenberg, while it should be ØXENBERG HANSEN Peter.
Luckily that doesn't matter! Names were taken from CQRanking at some point but all data is just based on unique identifiers. Website just takes those into consideration and names are just for show.

Will change it though regardless, as on results people will look for Oxenberg and not Hansen :)
 
Read an article, where his U23 coach says, that he will become certainly one of the best riders in the world.
That was enough for me to pick him..
One of the best riders of what though? I haven't really been able to put my finger on what type of rider he is. Is he a sprinter, or will he be a cobbled classics guy or just an attacking rider in general? He's not a climber by the looks of it so stage races and many classics are out of the question really.

That said I'm sure he will be a good enough pick. He can probably break 200 points easily. But is he this years Del Toro, breaking 800 points. I doubt it. Which is why I went for other riders instead.
 
Sente Sentjens is an exellent young procpect! He could do sprints, TTs, and Classics among the juniors. He maxed out 1500 watts in the sprint at the E3 Saxo Bank Classic, which he won easily. Honestly there is so much potential in that kid!

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmZM0xDXPgg


His father (Roy) is former professonal with Rabobank and Lotto and winner of Kuurne-Brussel-Kuurne in 2003. His mother Inn Stevens, won the national Belgian champioships in the junior category back in 1998.

His price tag was 89 points I see. I found that a little too high for a development squad rider, but depending on your narrative for success, I guess it could work out. If your OK with a smaller profit at least- Personally there were other options in that price range I found more reliable at least in 2025.

Noa Isidore is a puncher/fast man type rider who theoretically could vacuum some good points if Decathlon knit together a solid French calendar for him! I am a bit more skeptical about how he matches up against international talent though - by all means, he is a good prospect, I'm just not quite sold on him yet.

Admittedly I do have a weakness for riders who power up the climb to Motuvun. + His rider repertoire is CQ-friendly, so I can see the signs of a potentially solid pick in 2025.
First rider on my 2026 shortlist! Thanks!
 
  • Love
Reactions: Jakob747
Okay, my only obvious miss was Bagioli, who I didn't notice.. possibly wouldn't have picked him anyway, though.

But I have to ask what the Behrens hype is all about? I never really paid any attention to him, but was his WC win (which I granted didn't watch) really that impressive that it swayed ppl? Remember how Baroncinis first year post-wc was? And that was an impressive win IMO.
Look at who he beat. Aside from Svrcek who seems to double his watt output whenever the U23 Worlds come along, it's one rider who's already been tearing it up against the pros after the other. And he just demolished them in a way Baroncini didn't. Finally, Baroncini spent about half of his first pro season on the asphalt rather than the bike which didn't help matters.

Oh, and he had done a grand total of three UCI races (including one NC) prior to 2024 because he's a late entrant to the sport, so every reason to believe in his potential development curve.