• We hope all of you have a great holiday season and wonderful Christmas. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community in 2025 and beyond!

The 2026 CQ Ranking Manager Thread

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Dec 12, 2010
1,198
972
12,680
Salvarani 2025: none (Almeida at 988 was really close)
shalgo 2024: Ayuso (1023 -> 1276)
Blues in the Bottle 2023: Roglic (1240 -> 2744)
EvansIsTheBest 2022: Evenepoel (1325 -> 3154)
Object 2021: none (but post Covid season with fewer options in that range and Evenepoel at 918 came close)
bminchow 2020: none (but obviously the season didn't play out as usual)
fauniera 2019: Bernal (1130 -> 2214)
Ruvu75 2018: Alaphilippe (1011 -> 2085)
fauniera 2017: none
skidmark 2016: none
Cykeltyven 2015: Rodriguez (1150 -> 1750)
Pentacycle 2014: Contador (1228 -> 2543)
SteelyDan 2013: Sagan (1963 -> 2673), Gilbert (1086 -> 949)
skidmark 2012: none
ingsve 2011: none

8 winners with at least one 1000+ points rider and 7 without. Both pathways seem equally valid historically.
 
Oct 15, 2017
16,905
18,803
28,180
Salvarani 2025: none (Yates at 988 was really close)
shalgo 2024: Ayuso (1023 -> 1276)
Blues in the Bottle 2023: Roglic (1240 -> 2744)
EvansIsTheBest 2022: Evenepoel (1325 -> 3154)
Object 2021: none (but post Covid season with fewer options in that range and Evenepoel at 918 came close)
bminchow 2020: none (but obviously the season didn't play out as usual)
fauniera 2019: Bernal (1130 -> 2214)
Ruvu75 2018: Alaphilippe (1011 -> 2085)
fauniera 2017: none
skidmark 2016: none
Cykeltyven 2015: Rodriguez (1150 -> 1750)
Pentacycle 2014: Contador (1228 -> 2543)
SteelyDan 2013: Sagan (1963 -> 2673), Gilbert (1086 -> 949)
skidmark 2012: none
ingsve 2011: none

8 winners with at least one 1000+ points rider and 7 without. Both pathways seem equally valid historically.
It was Almeida but I had S. Yates as well ;)
 
Oct 5, 2010
4,286
330
16,180
There is inherent risk in 1000+ point picks too. If they go bust, that's a huge L - but is it more risky to have a 1000+0+0 combo than a 400+300+300 combo? It's also opportunity cost... Either way, I have my doubts on the entire 500+ crop. Still deciding between a fair few riders, even reconsidering some 800+ picks.. Some of the guys who made considerable leaps this year too among young riders, you just know someone is going to go from 300~ -> 1000, but is it worth it? Some of them go into quite stacked teams already... hard to really settle into the WT sometimes.
 
Jul 9, 2012
199
353
9,530
Quickly send in a team with 7470 points. No riders with zero points though, haven't checked (yet?) who they are.
 
Jul 9, 2012
199
353
9,530
The website will be offline in the beginning of the upcoming year. Did not use the domain names anymore so they will expire.

However, I made a dump of all the data and might create a low cost solution. Which should also be faster... Would still require a domain name though. Anyone with a good idea? (needs to be available) Or cheapest one will do?

Then it will become a cheap setup with Supabase, Github Actions and a simple domain name.
 

MFA

Dec 3, 2025
6
0
30
Hi all, and welcome to the 2026 CQ Ranking Manager Game! This is the 16th edition of the game! Please see below for some history, basics, and more specific rules related to dates, dopers, etc.

History

The game was launched on December 8th 2010 by cyclingnews forum poster Hugo Koblet. His idea was to have a game where you build a cycling team from the website cqranking.com and its comprehensive numerical rankings of riders. What was originally meant to be a 25-team max competition that Hugo reserved the right to cancel if there was lack of interest became the most successful game in cyclingnews forum history, and expanded to velorooms forums (RIP) as well.

Hugo successfully ran the game for 3 years, and it bred various offshoots, such as a youth game, seasonal games (classics and GTs), emerging riders and riders in decline games. I took over organizing the main game for 2014 when Hugo got too busy, and have done so since then. See the second post in this thread for a roll of honour of yearly champions.


That is it for preamble. Let’s go through the more comprehensive set of rules:

Basics

The game is based on the point system developed by the website www.cqranking.com. Based on this system you will have to select a team of between 25 and 33 riders whose combined value doesn’t exceed 7500 points. 7500 points is normally under the mean for the ProTour teams, although with top heavy teams this is not the case now as the median for 2025 is 6943. 7500 is closest to the amount of points team Uno-X made this season, the top ranked ProTeam and 9th ranked of all teams.

Your aim then is to select a team of riders who will increase their 2025 score the most during the 2026 season. The winner of the game is the one who has selected the team with the highest combined value when the game ends.


1. How the game works

1.1. Start & Finish

The season starts when the first major race (.1 or higher) giving CQ points is held and ends when the last major race is held. The winner will be crowned when the next update after the last major race is out.*

*An extension will be granted to the end of season if it is very close at the top. If any teams are within 100 points of the leader after the last major race, the season will be automatically extended until the final race of the year unless all teams within 100 points explicitly concede. As well, anyone in the top 10 can extend the season by PMing me a request to do so before the last major race starts.

(The reason for this second rule is that although minor races go through December, it is rare to have a rider in the game participate in these races, so it is sensible to end the season when people are still generally watching cycling. But if it's a very close race, it's important to crown the person who picked the best team for the year.)

1.2 Updates
Each week we will publish an update with a top 10 and a list of the high scorers and high jumpers. This will sometimes be by me, and sometimes by others – I will be setting a tentative schedule based on volunteers.

2. On doping

2.1. On ex-dopers

All riders are available to choose, except for riders who are provisionally suspended by the UCI (in the top list of this link).

Riders who have been suspended for doping and had that affect their 2025 score will not be available simply for their 2025 score. Instead, a rider’s value will be equivalent to that of his last full season; or, if he has more recently had a (not full, due to suspension) season in which he has earned more points, that season represents his value. Riders who have been suspended by the UCI (ie. Not merely provisionally suspended) are on the bottom list of the same link as above.

Therefore, you can pick any rider you like, but if you want to take Michel Hessmann, for example, his suspension ended in early 2025 and started in 2024 (even though the sample was from 2023), so his 2025 and 2024 scores of 40 and 0 would not be his cost. Instead, he got 69 points in 2023 prior to his suspension, which would be his cost for this game.

Hopefully the lists I've provided and the rules are clear enough, but if you make an error I will try to let you know if any of your submissions fall into this category.

2.2. Riders getting caught during the season
If you include a rider in your team who gets caught with his hands in the cookie jar, nothing happens right away. Your rider keeps his points unless the cqranking.com deletes his results before the end of the game.

Basically, the value of a rider on cqranking.com always stands.

3. Submitting your team

3.1. How do I?

You pick between 25 and 33 riders whose combined value doesn’t exceed 7500 points and send the list to me.

As I will manually have to copy/enter the teams into the Microsoft Excel file which keeps track of the scores, please be careful that you send your team to me based on the correct formula. I don’t take any responsibility for any error you might make. If I spot an error I will do my best to contact you but I can’t guarantee anything. Of course, if you have any questions feel free to ask either here in this thread or by sending a personal message.

The layout you need to use is this:

POGACAR Tadej
DEL TORO ROMERO Isaac
Etc.

Nothing else. No point scores after the name. Also, be careful that there is no “space” after the name, because I will have to delete it manually, but can't always detect these things in time for the game. If there is an error that isn't discovered until after the game starts, and that error makes your team ineligible (eg. if it puts your team over the limit) the rider will simply be deleted from the team without replacement.

To make things easier for both you and me I will link to a file for you to download in which you can type in your team and it will automatically show you the value of each rider as well as the aggregated value of your team. Then you will just have to copy your team (names only) directly from this file and send it to me.

Hopefully this clears any misunderstandings of a rider’s value as well as reduces the number of errors made in a team sent to me.

3.2. When do I?
The first race of the season will start January 8, so I want to have your team in hand on January 7 at the latest.

There are two deadlines: a submission deadline and a revision/publication deadline, spaced 24 hours apart. This is to address the issue brought up in recent years about whether it is 'fair' to allow changes after teams have seen the teams of other players, and for 'late' submissions. I would like to make this a game that is accessible to as many people as possible, yet preserve that element of fairness. So, the submission deadline will be when I want to have received all the teams. The revision and publication deadline is to allow a 24-hour period for me to look over the teams and allow a chance to people to change their team in case of error, before having access to a list of riders that other teams picked. If you get mixed up with the time zone or unexpectedly don't have internet access around the submission deadline, I will accept teams up to the revision deadline at my discretion, but if allowed those teams will not have the chance to revise in case of error.

The submission deadline is 23:59 (CET) January 6th, so early January 7th for Aussies and sometime earlier on January 6th for North Americans. The revision and publication deadline is 24 hours later; I would ask that people refrain from posting the riders on their team until after that, so midnight CET on the start of January 8th.

Please note that even though the racing season is over, it is always possible that CQ will adjust points for an earlier season race for whatever reason (eg. readjusting points for suspended dopers) Be mindful of these changes.

cqranking.com usually uploads the final update of the season on December 31, and the values in this update are the ones we’re using. However, the changes are usually very small so there’s no reason why you can’t start selecting your team already today!

Disclaimer: ensuring your team is full of eligible riders and is on budget is your responsibility. If I notice you are over budget or have an ineligible rider I will send you a message, but if you don't get back to me in time, or I don't catch it before the deadline, I will simply remove one rider to make your budget work. Obviously it is to your advantage to be able to choose all your riders, so please be diligent.

Create Your Team


Hugo created a very helpful file in 2012, referred to above, that helps avoid any errors in calculation and helps ensure you are formatting your rider names correctly. I would encourage everyone to use this option, especially if you are not confident in your spreadsheet creating skills. Please use the file attached here to create your team, then copy and paste the rider names to send to me by PM once you have it correct. Thank you.

note: the 'create your team' file has not yet been manually updated to include different scores for dopers as per rule 2.1, so it is currently wholly your responsibility to account for this.

I think that about covers everything. If you have any questions or if I forgot to add or explain anything, please let me know.
Thanks for the detailed write-up and for continuing to run this game, much appreciated. The rules and deadlines are very clear, especially around ex-dopers and revisions. One quick clarification: if someone accidentally prices an ex-doper incorrectly, will you try to flag it before the revision deadline, or is that entirely on the participant? Looking forward to another great edition.
 
Jul 9, 2012
199
353
9,530
CQmanager.com or CQmanagergame.com should likely be available?
Merci.

You bought cqmanager.com.

Before I had only checked cqgame and that wasn't available.

Nothing there yet but when I have spare minutes I'll get a simple version there. Which compared to previous should be lightning fast. I will remove all other games for now (e.g. Giro) and history and initially just create it for running years version.
 
Mar 13, 2009
3,857
2,411
16,680
Hey everyone! I just updated the Create Your Team spreadsheet with the December 31st numbers, so check your team against that for the official numbers.

I have about 15-20 messages so far which have been backlogged/unanswered due to holiday busy times. I will start on those in earnest tomorrow (Jan 1st), depending on my New Years recovery. So if you have submitted a team and haven't heard back from me, I plead for patience, I will be caught up by the 2nd for sure. Thanks everyone, happy new year!
 
Mar 13, 2009
3,857
2,411
16,680
Thanks for the detailed write-up and for continuing to run this game, much appreciated. The rules and deadlines are very clear, especially around ex-dopers and revisions. One quick clarification: if someone accidentally prices an ex-doper incorrectly, will you try to flag it before the revision deadline, or is that entirely on the participant? Looking forward to another great edition.
lt's the responsibility of the participant... I try to note potentially obvious picks that are affected by that, but often get tips from forum participants to change scores. If I do discover someone who has been selected but is not eligible at their 2025 price, I will message affected teams and sometimes post on the thread. But ultimately, I don't have complete knowledge of all riders, I just know the ones I have considered for the game plus doping cases I remember off the top of my head. So if a participant selects a rider that isn't discovered as ineligible until after the publication deadline, that rider will just be dropped and the team not have the maximum amount of riders.
 
Oct 21, 2012
3,864
3,219
19,180
This is exactly my assessment as well. I can't find a single rider under 100 points I'm thrilled about, but there are probably 30 riders in the 200-500 points bracket that are worthy of consideration.
Maybe last year we were spoilt a little? Sexias, Withen, Vermeersch, Del Grosso and Tullet all did spectacularly for their price, and only a couple of my <100 point riders really didn't perform. This year I might end up having a similar amount, though there's a few real punts as I can't find any injury updates/information.

Overall, I'd agree that there seems to far less potential for any of them to really take off. Actually, I'm wondering now whether to bother including them...
 
Last edited:
May 5, 2010
51,907
30,437
28,180
Just out of curiosity regarding suspended riders:

All riders are available to choose, except for riders who are provisionally suspended by the UCI

Is it straight up "you can't pick him"? Or is it more "you can pick him, but it would be rather stupid, coz he won't score any points for you"?
 
Oct 21, 2012
3,864
3,219
19,180
This game is mostly about not missing out on individual picks that several others have identified.
Definitely. Squire would have won quite easily, if he hadn't somehow missed out on Brennan.

And also agree with your assessment of the risk/reward ratio of expensive picks. Your reasoning is much more rationale than mine, but I prefer to avoid them as I like to have a spread of riders to follow as it makes the game/season more interesting for me.

Last year it didn't really matter as there were so few decent picks in the 200-700 range, that you could include WVA and Vingo (poor return as a combination) and still do really well. This season seems to be the complete opposite? Only have 22 penciled in so far, none of whom cost more than 700, and am already at 5,500 points. There's a 1000+ point rider I'd like to include, mainly for the enjoyment factor, but will have to exclude some much more obvious choices at a lower cost. Really difficult selection process this year.
 
Mar 12, 2009
5,267
1,097
20,680
Definitely. Squire would have won quite easily, if he hadn't somehow missed out on Brennan.

And also agree with your assessment of the risk/reward ratio of expensive picks. Your reasoning is much more rationale than mine, but I prefer to avoid them as I like to have a spread of riders to follow as it makes the game/season more interesting for me.

Last year it didn't really matter as there were so few decent picks in the 200-700 range, that you could include WVA and Vingo (poor return as a combination) and still do really well. This season seems to be the complete opposite? Only have 22 penciled in so far, none of whom cost more than 700, and am already at 5,500 points. There's a 1000+ point rider I'd like to include, mainly for the enjoyment factor, but will have to exclude some much more obvious choices at a lower cost. Really difficult selection process this year.
Ya, I made my complete team and there were still enough interesting riders left with potential that I could build a complete second team as well that would not embarrass itself in this competition. So it really comes down to who one thinks will have the absolute best potential returns for their price range. I'm not as worried about missing riders this year since the alternatives are likely to also do fairly well. I've tweaked my team out of my worst tendencies of hoping riders do well to riders that should do well given what we know. Some gambles still remain though but mostly cheap ones.
 
Mar 12, 2009
5,267
1,097
20,680
This is exactly my assessment as well. I can't find a single rider under 100 points I'm thrilled about, but there are probably 30 riders in the 200-500 points bracket that are worthy of consideration.
I still ended up with 8 riders for under 100 points. 3 of them I do have high hopes for but 3 of them is just to cover in case they go big but they are perhaps just as likely to end up giving 100 points profit or something. Then I also did end up with a couple of 0 pointers that I hope can give a few hundred points at least. No Seixas hopes but perhaps normal 0-pointer returns.
 
Oct 5, 2010
4,286
330
16,180
It's so annoying. I'm still tinkering with my team, some 400+ riders going in and out of the team. I feel like I can't trust any of them to reliably 1.5-2x their points.. Some of them have huge upside, being in their sophomore seasons and will likely improve further, but how much? And how much could certain riders rebound going to new teams in their early 30s? I haven't spent this much time on team construction ever, so at least I am not missing the deadline this year.
 
Dec 28, 2010
4,176
3,172
21,180
Definitely. Squire would have won quite easily, if he hadn't somehow missed out on Brennan.
Thanks for giving me a traumatic start to the new year! :D

I posted earlier that I was trying to finalise the last few spots on my team. Ended up redesigning large parts of it, including almost all the most expensive ones. So I guess it wasn't that settled, after all. Will probably go through a few more iterations before the deadline. Too many options this year!