- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,854
- 2
- 0
Polish said:Polish logic
If it makes you feel better substitute hookers and blow for jet fuel.....
Polish said:Polish logic
Polish said:What is it with you and Jet Fuel?
I do admit I find your obsession/schtick amusing
But seriously, why would the US Gov care about Lance's jet fuel?
First, there is the powerful jet fuel / business jet lobby backing Lance up.
And second, it is not like Lance is flying around in Air Force One.
Tell me RR, when you are at the airport waiting in line to take your shoes off and get searched, does it bother you that Lance can stroll up to his private jet, Nikes firmly on foot, and crack open a brewski as he enters the jet?
Bother you just a tiny bit maybe?
And tell me RR, when you travel on business, do YOU pay for your own jet fuel? Or do you have someone ELSE pick up the tab. I sure hope you pay your own way lol.
BotanyBay said:My Polish, you do seem to have a man-love thing for RR.
At $2.57/gal and considering a full load of Jet-A fuel for a Gulfstream G5 costs about $10,000.00 per fueling (plus many other operating costs)... If Lance were really concerned about putting as many dollars as possible towards the fight against cancer, he might consider downgrading to 1st class on a commercial aviation flight.
kurtinsc said:A business class ticket from Texas to Europe is about 3-5 grand. I'd assume first class would be similar.
How many refuelings is that? Is it really much cheaper?
kurtinsc said:A business class ticket from Texas to Europe is about 3-5 grand. I'd assume first class would be similar.
How many refuelings is that? Is it really much cheaper?
Hugh Januss said:Looks like that would free up another 5-7 grand to be but into the vital fight to raise Cancer Awareness.
kurtinsc said:A business class ticket from Texas to Europe is about 3-5 grand. I'd assume first class would be similar.
How many refuelings is that? Is it really much cheaper?
BotanyBay said:Do you have any idea how much it costs to operate a G5? It's about $3,200+ per hour. Do the math on a flight to Europe. A 1st class seat on a Boeing is MUCH cheaper.
BotanyBay said:Do you have any idea how much it costs to operate a G5? It's about $3,200+ per hour. Do the math on a flight to Europe. A 1st class seat on a Boeing is MUCH cheaper.
lean said:you beat me to it![]()
thehog said:Having your own jet in executive circles is known as the "liquid" stage. Its when you have so much money that the thought of taking the jet on a 24 hour flight to Australia rather than first class doesn't enter your mind. I think you'll find it costs around 5k an hour to run. You also pay excessive airport entrance fees.
Armstrong used to timeshare his jet. He didn't own it he just bought a certain amount if hours per year for use.
He now has his own jet. One problem thou. He's still not "liquid" enough to afford a jet. He's only bringing in around 10 million a year which is not enough to run a jet. Thankfully Livestrong picks up the costs on the plane and all is sweet. He can pretend to be liquid. Also means Anna and the family can travel on the Livestrong dime also.
Now lets not debate the untold damage to the environment by taking a jet rather than a passenger plane whereby the fuel damage is shared.
Velocentric said:The standard justification I've heard regarding Lance and his love of the private jet is it's for security. As one of the most recognisable people in the World apparently He's at risk if he flies commercial.
I feel sad for all those Hollywood A listers who are far more recognisable but don't have a Charity of their own to consider their security.
Velocentric said:The standard justification I've heard regarding Lance and his love of the private jet is it's for security. As one of the most recognisable people in the World apparently He's at risk if he flies commercial.
I feel sad for all those Hollywood A listers who are far more recognisable but don't have a Charity of their own to consider their security.
BotanyBay said:Tiger Woods can afford his own Jet. If Lance owns one too, either he's having others pick up the tab, or he's being reckless with the finances. No way is Lance liquid enough to just hop on the jet whenever he wants. That'll burn money not unlike MC Hammer.
]
Race Radio said:Yeah, that is an old Falcon they used for a photo shoot. Here is his actual plane.
G-IVSP
![]()
BotanyBay said:The security angle is BS. Every major airport has a VIP entrance service for celebs for exactly that reason. Any airline would give him a private waiting room.
Anyone know his tail number? There's a service out there that allows you to track the takeoffs and landing of private jets (if he's not requested it be kept private)
Velocentric said:You can track it here, should you be interested:
http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N7LA
Although it appears to have been removed from the system as N7LA owned & operated by Mellow Johnnys Aviation LLC hasn't operated since January 15th 2009
thehog said:You read me wrong. The Flinders licence payment was in addition to the 2 million personal TDU appearance fee.*
The Flinders had been commissioned long ago with the funding in place. The centre exists today but they are moving to the new site when its complete.*
There was political pressure to get Armstrong name into the FMC even thou he's not done anything in terms of raising the funds or assisting with the initiative. So someone probably Rann forced the project owners to spend some of the funding in buying the "Livestrong" name to name part of the centre. (it wouldn't surprise me if Armstrong pressured Rann to arrange this)
So Armstrong was paid again in addition to his appearance fee.
Now it's not unusual that medical centre have corporate sponsorship. In fact most need corporate money to survival. But its highly unusual to see a medical centre paying a corporate in this case Lance Armstrong to "dedicate" his name to the centre.*
So Armstrong turns up to mark the building of the centre. The local press bill his appearance as if he has donated the funds for the centre and Livestrong is supporting the medical unit. As it turns out Livestrong walked away from the deal giving nothing. No programs, no money, no staff, nothing. They took the naming fee and ran!
Now it's not popular to question how money is spent on these types of places. The FMC is a really good thing. The Livestrong part stinks but the opposition government is not going to dig too deep on something that would only make them look bad by questioning.
I bring all this up to show that Livestrong is doing sweet FA in terms of research and treatment. They'll happily take the cash and the accolades of such a centre but not contribute to it.
Dr. Maserati said:Although I am interested in 'Velocentrics' post I am not convinced that Flinders paid extra for the Livestrong naming.
Here is a run down on what I remember:
The first mention of renaming it was byDr. Andrew Southcott speaking during Parliment in February 2009.
BotanyBay said:Funny, that log says it was a Cessna Skylane 182 flight in Wisconsin. Odd.
I have no problem accepting that it was not donated by LA (or the LAF) - in fact I linked this piece 2 months ago on a seperate thread.thehog said:Parliamentary privilege. All subsequent releases have "dedicated" where the privilege does not apply.
I'm not saying I'm right but I've heard there was a fee. What exactly does "giving" the name actually do?
But I am just not sure you are correct to suggest that there was an extra and seperate payment made.A lasting link between cycling legend and cancer survivor Lance Armstrong and South Australia will be created when a new Woodhead designed centre for cancer research at Flinders Medical Centre is dedicated in his name.
