- May 26, 2010
- 28,143
- 5
- 0
Hugh Januss said:It is extremely disrespectful to all the children born out of wedlock.
you mean flicky, polish, stephens, sparty and all at pubic stratalies
Hugh Januss said:It is extremely disrespectful to all the children born out of wedlock.
AussieGoddess said:(I know Schleck might not be clean either, but he hasnt tested posative).
For the good of cycling they need to show that the rules apply to everyone. Inlcuding and especially the winner of the Tour de France.
Polyarmour said:Contador is a goner. He has lost the TdF already.
The only decision to be made is whether it's a 1 year or 2 year ban.
These "good of the sport" appeals are nonsense. The sport is WAY bigger than these cheats. Contador is on his way from rooster to feather duster.
NEXT!!!!
Polyarmour said:Contador is a goner. He has lost the TdF already.
The only decision to be made is whether it's a 1 year or 2 year ban.
These "good of the sport" appeals are nonsense. The sport is WAY bigger than these cheats. Contador is on his way from rooster to feather duster.
NEXT!!!!
Hugh Januss said:It is extremely disrespectful to all the children born out of wedlock.
katkotom said:now, here is a trump card for AC
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/34-arrested-in-spanish-clenbuterol-investigation
According to the Guardia Civil, the product, Spasmobronchal, has a legal use for treatment of horses that have problems with blood supply to their lungs. However, in this case the product has allegedly been supplied to farmers to fatten up cattleand to athletes as a performance-booster.
Race Radio said:Why does every thread have to be about Lance?
JA.Tri said:I don't know the rules associated with "crits".
My limited understanding of doping bans (sports in general) restricts training to only that performed alone (therefore no "competing"). No connection to/interaction with "affiliated sporting teams" is allowed (teams affiliated with the peak body).
I had assumed the same would apply to cyclists...and I had assumed the "crit" in question would be affiliated as above![]()
AND therefore AC would be "banned" from competing.
So I really don't know...nor understand
Hence mild embarrassment and confusion in admitting to ignorance.
hrotha said:Honestly I don't think it changes much. Everybody pretty much assumed some rogue farmers would still use it, but the relevant thing here is clen hasn't shown up in the controls for years, which suggests it's not that common and which makes Contador's explanation not very likely from a statistical point of view, especially in light of its use as a banned substance among athletes.
JA.Tri said:"Spaniard plans to race in Oviedo despite provisional suspension" CN
Please tell me how this is possible; that AC can compete in the face of the suspension?
Is he allowed to participate, as it is farewell ride for RadioShack's Chechu Rubiera, rather than compete? That is not claim a win and finish in the middle of the peleton as a sign of respect???
Ta js
Do you have a link?El Pistolero said:A study done by a Belgian university says otherwise. Study written in 2009.
Just sayin'
Ps: under your logic Lance is a clean rider. Cause he never tested positive you know![]()