The Chris Squared Thread

[The Hitch]

When Froome comes out with some of the ridiculous statements that Horner made about Armstrong, then I will compare them, until then .............zzzzzzzzz

Wiggins did make those ridiculous statements however. Will you compare them?

 

[JimmyFingers]

Vayer would fit in very well here, perfect combination of snark and play ground name-calling. In fact methinks he probably comes her for source material. Thehog is his role model.

 

[sniper]

Problem is evaluations of history are not always accurate.

true. Empirical data and historical data have to match. If they don't, the historical data are probably inaccurate. In the case of cycling, though, there has been no such conflict between empirical and historical data.
They match perfectly.

Well sniper we will have to agree to disagree then, life is to short for a vortex

couldn't agree more

 

[del1962]

Wiggins did make those ridiculous statements however. Will you compare them?

After USADA report came out?

Did he say the winners was the one who finished first and passed the tests?

 

[Moose McKnuckles]

I found those ardent attackers of Froome like Moose defending Horner the most hilarious, even using the 'poor US boy forced to dope by the dirty Euros' excuse pedaled by Lance.

I wasn't defending Horner. Don't blame me if you struggle with English comprehension.

Oh, and yes, Froome is a complete joke. A joke played on British muppets too eager to believe.

 

[JimmyFingers]

You made excuses for him which mirrored Lance's, 'the Euro's made me do it boo-hoo', in sharp contrast to the vehemence you frequently demonstrate in your attacks on Sky. It's obviously tribalism, a fans myopia, you love Horner and you hate Froome, Horner's doping is excusable, Froome's doping isn't blah blah.

And Froome may have the passport but he isn't British, he's never lived or raced here. The Kenyan flag on his bike should tell you all your need to know about that.

As for the comprehension and muppet insults, classy as ever. Don't ever change.

 

[sniper]

After USADA report came out?
Did he say the winners was the one who finished first and passed the tests?

any other disclaimers?

 

[Major Taylor]

Horner

Once he rips them apart in a tt then I will think he is doped. It might be coming.

 

[Samson777]

clearly Santambrogio was clean because he blew up before the end of the Giro.

Clearly: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/report-santambrogio-could-be-cleared-of-doping

Santambrogio is a victim and it's impossible not to feel bad for him...

 

[goggalor]

Imagine how good the Froome dog will be when he passes fourty. Only the Monkey King can stop him then.

 

[BroDeal]

I wasn't defending Horner. Don't blame me if you struggle with English comprehension.

Oh, and yes, Froome is a complete joke. A joke played on British muppets too eager to believe.

One of the funniest things about this Horner deal is Sky true believers too thick to figure out the comments about Horner are parodying the true believer's own defense of Froome.

 

[JimmyFingers]

Do you mean moi? You calling me thick?

 

[Netserk]

RE: OP

Congrats Bro, you've just hacked the code

 

[jens_attacks]

monster time by panzerwagen

i really doubt that horner can beat that

 

[the sceptic]

One of the funniest things about this Horner deal is Sky true believers too thick to figure out the comments about Horner are parodying the true believer's own defense of Froome.

The best part is that they have to think everyone else is clean too, otherwise they will look like hypocrites for defending Froomezilla. I hope Horner wins the vuelta just so we can get so see what kind of explanation they will make for him being clean.

 

[sniper]

No irony, as I said if Froome comes out with the same bull on Armstrong that Horner has then I will compare them, until then ...

Froome is not a talker. He'll say nothing before he says anything really stupid.
His former trainer speaks a bit more from the heart though. This is David Kinjah on Armstrong, after the USADA report:

“To be honest he inspired many to follow his footsteps. He was and will be my role model.”

 

[del1962]

Froome is not a talker. He'll say nothing before he says anything really stupid.
His former trainer speaks a bit more from the heart though. This is David Kinjah on Armstrong, after the USADA report:

And my teachers from years ago says things I don't agree with, typically irrelvevent info to Froome.

If Froome (not someone else from Froome's past), says similar things about Lance as Horner, then it will raise on Froome the same flag that Horner's comments on Armstrong raise.

 

[sniper]

And my teachers from years ago says things I don't agree with, typically irrelvevent info to Froome.

If Froome (not someone else from Froome's past), says similar things about Lance as Horner, then it will raise on Froome the same flag that Horner's comments on Armstrong raise.

and of course his current trainer was a big opponent of armstrong. probably why he brought in yates

you just gotta love this one from 2011:

But with the addition of Wiggins, Team Sky look as if they can take on the Tour. The pursuiter Geraint Thomas may have even better credentials than Wiggins himself when it comes to taking on the prologue time trial, while one of the directeurs sportifs, Sean Yates, has spent years at Lance Armstrong's side which could prove useful.

 

[Don't be late Pedro]

and of course his current trainer was a big opponent of armstrong. probably why he brought in yates

you just gotta love this one from 2011:

Your six degrees of Froome explanation is a pretty poor attempt at joining the dots. By your logic it is, no doubt, possible to prove Kevin Bacon* is on a doping programme.

(*For those interested Kevin Bacon has a Froome Number of 5)

 

[sniper]

Your six degrees of Froome explanation is a pretty poor attempt at joining the dots. By your logic it is, no doubt, possible to prove Kevin Bacon* is on a doping programme.

(*For those interested Kevin Bacon has a Froome Number of 5)

i'm not proving anything or joining any dots.
just laughing a bit about del1962's motivation why he refuses to compare froome with horner.

 

[mewmewmew13]

WHy isn't this called "The Bald Chris thread"?

Pappy clawing back into 2nd today...

so when does Froome turn 40?

 

[Boeing]

Froome is not a talker. He'll say nothing before he says anything really stupid.

he leaves the stupid talk to his girl

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

i'm not proving anything or joining any dots.
just laughing a bit about del1962's motivation why he refuses to compare froome with horner.

B/c Froome and Horner are night/day difference. There is nothing close comparable...

 

[peloton]

he leaves the stupid talk to his girl

Whom at some point claimed (on twitter) to be his nutritionist, explaining why Froome was so thin, but still powerful. Funny that she has deleted those tweets, they were so worth a laugh.

What Horner does at the Vuelta is not far from what Froome did at the Tour. He is only 14 years older and winning by a minute instead of minutes

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

Whom at some point claimed (on twitter) to be his nutritionist, explaining why Froome was so thin, but still powerful. Funny that she has deleted those tweets, they were so worth a laugh.

What Horner does at the Vuelta is not far from what Froome did at the Tour. He is only 14 years older and winning by a minute instead of minutes

Froome does it now for 3 years in a row in the best sporting age (26-28), while Horner did shine at age 38 out of nowhere (TdF), age 40 (at the no testing ToC-Joke), and age 42 in the Vuelta. What did he do his first 37 years on the planet???

As said, a night/day difference.