zigmeister said:
Wiggo had 2 minutes over Froome on ITTs. The final Stage 19 ITT 54KM, Wiggo gained an additional 30 seconds over Froome with only 8KM more distance than the previous ITT, where he gained about 1 minutes over Froome. Now, there are a lot of mountain stages. If Froome was on another team, and he was up against Brad, could he have taken more than two minutes if Wiggo had help like Porte instead of Froome to help climb? We will never know.
But Froome's job was to help Wiggo...we've seen this time and again. Van Garderen/Evans 2013 TDF? Yet, you don't hear/see TJ being a D-bag team mate running around in the media, his girlfriend tweeting stupid nonsense whining that he should be the team leader. BMC management makes the call on that...not a crybaby rider.
This is what has really set Froome apart, and it has gone full tilt with this book. He comes off extremely arrogant, selfish, condescending and the list goes on of adjectives we could use about him...all brought upon himself.
I have managed to read most of the book now. It's neither terribly good, nor as bad as some here make out - that appears to be a mere confirmation bias. But it does make Froome look extraordinarily selfish. not unpleasant; he seems to have some charm; but hidiously selfish.
But Above all, I do find the attitude of Froome to Wiggins in 2012 and after extraordinary.
Set aside any dislike of Wiggins for a moment. Froome seems to ignore the fact that Wiggins has been the 'leader' since 2010, and had to deal with the pressure since then; through the disaster and humiliation of 2010, through the broken collorbone derailing him in 2011 when after the paris-nice and dauphine wiggins was clearly a contender, through the 2011 vuelta comeback which, for all his fading in the real grippy mountains showed wiggins was there or thereabouts still, and through the extraordinary start to 2012.
He seems to think all the planning and work that Sky clearly put into Wiggins winning 2012 over three years should be set aside because Froome, having done little since the Vuelta, suddenly found form on Belles Filles, and that all that work of three years should just be fired out the window at the very point its about to succeed for what would be, lets remember, Sky's first win in a GT. That's practically suicidal from a team perspective.
I simply find that hard to credit. I read that froome felt Wiggins was difficult because he was quiet and moody. Compared to Hinault, do you think? or, God help us, Armstrong?
Of course Wiggins post Tour strop paints him in a terrible light as a general thing - but given after years of work, he was almost sabotaged by Froome's impatience (after all, given the relative ages, Froome must have known his time was going to come anyway) - I'm not sure his strops with Froome in particular are really all that unjustified.