86TDFWinner said:
I have no dog in this fight BUT.........do you possess evidence disputing her opinion? In other words, where is your "evidence" showing that what she said is incorrect?
This thread is about evidence, correct?
Some person is claiming "Indeed, in a few short months he (Armstrong) nearly wrecked the sport (triathlon)."
So in a thread about evidence, some wild and IMO ridiculous claim is made and I ask for evidence as to that claim. Something, anything, to back it up.
And you want me to provide evidence that it is an incorrect claim?
I don't have evidence that the sport of triathlon is not wrecked, but I'd be willing to bet that LA hasn't wrecked it in a few short months. He's not that important to them.
So much so that they had NO problem BANNING him from the sport instantly.
BANNING HIM. Say it with me. He is banninated.
Here is the evidence of his bannination from triathlon:
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/06/14/sport/armstrong-doping-allegations/index.html
... Lance Armstrong won't be allowed to compete in international Ironman triathlon contests while he's under investigation for doping, the World Triathlon Corporation announced Thursday.
...
WTC rules "dictate an athlete is ineligible to compete during an open investigation. Armstrong is therefore suspended from competing in WTC-owned and licensed races pending further review," the organization said in a statement.
You can't wreck what you're banned from.
Here's a hint: I will no longer respond to LL posts, are they are typically OT and seek to muddy / dilute threads. I do not wish to pursue this line of dilution any further.