- May 27, 2012
- 6,458
- 0
- 0
Now, this back and forth is getting ridiculous. And yes, I do recognize the level or ridiculousness and arrogance in my responses.
I will leave with this: I merely suggested that mutual mistake might be grounds for setting aside the settlement agreement between SCA and Mr. Armstrong, and that mutual mistake might require less legal wrangling than other grounds like fraud. It is almost certain that a court will have to consider the question of whether to set aside the settlement agreement if Mr. Armstrong decides to fight this. He may very well not fight, and in my opinion, he will lose if he does.
Evidently, that is akin committing heresy in this forum to suggest such things. Considering the fact that I could very well be wrong about my assertion, I will offer this (as I offered all of the fanboys on Slowtwitch regarding the subject matter jurisdiction argument I had there): if that issue is never raised, I will come to this thread and admit my error and take any verbal abuse anyone wants to dole out. (and I feel that occurrence is MUCH more likely than me ever having to have done that on Slowtwitch). However, if it is included, all of those here taking pot shots need to have the testicular fortitude to come here and take a little of the medicine I would like to dole out if I am right.
And with that, this thread is dead to me until that day, so until then, keep your feet on the ground, and keep reaching for the stars.
I will leave with this: I merely suggested that mutual mistake might be grounds for setting aside the settlement agreement between SCA and Mr. Armstrong, and that mutual mistake might require less legal wrangling than other grounds like fraud. It is almost certain that a court will have to consider the question of whether to set aside the settlement agreement if Mr. Armstrong decides to fight this. He may very well not fight, and in my opinion, he will lose if he does.
Evidently, that is akin committing heresy in this forum to suggest such things. Considering the fact that I could very well be wrong about my assertion, I will offer this (as I offered all of the fanboys on Slowtwitch regarding the subject matter jurisdiction argument I had there): if that issue is never raised, I will come to this thread and admit my error and take any verbal abuse anyone wants to dole out. (and I feel that occurrence is MUCH more likely than me ever having to have done that on Slowtwitch). However, if it is included, all of those here taking pot shots need to have the testicular fortitude to come here and take a little of the medicine I would like to dole out if I am right.
And with that, this thread is dead to me until that day, so until then, keep your feet on the ground, and keep reaching for the stars.